Literature DB >> 24003355

Diagnostic accuracy of cardiac computed tomography angiography for myocardial infarction.

Monvadi B Srichai1, Hersh Chandarana, Robert Donnino, Irene Isabel P Lim, Christianne Leidecker, James Babb, Jill E Jacobs.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate diagnostic accuracy of high, low and mixed voltage dual energy computed tomography (DECT) for detection of prior myocardial infarction (MI).
METHODS: Twenty-four consecutive patients (88% male, mean age 65 ± 11 years old) with clinically documented prior MI (> 6 mo) were prospectively recruited to undergo late phase DECT for characterization of their MI. Computed tomography (CT) examinations were performed using a dual source CT system (64-slice Definition or 128-slice Definition FLASH, Siemens Healthcare) with initial first pass and 10 min late phase image acquisitions. Using the 17-segment model, regional systolic function was analyzed using first pass CT as normal or abnormal (hypokinetic, akinetic, dyskinetic). Regions with abnormal systolic function were identified as infarct segments. Late phase DE scans were reconstructed into: 140 kVp, 100 kVp, mixed (120 kVp) images and iodine-only datasets. Using the same 17-segment model, each dataset was evaluated for possible (grade 2) or definite (grade 3) late phase myocardial enhancement abnormalities. Logistic regression for correlated data was used to compare reconstructions in terms of the accuracy for detecting infarct segments using late myocardial hyperenhancement scores.
RESULTS: All patients reported prior history of documented myocardial infarction, with most occurring more than 5 years prior (n = 18; 75% of cohort). Fifty-five of 408 (13%) segments demonstrated abnormal wall motion and were classified as infarct. The remaining 353 segments were classified as non-infarcted segments. A total of 1692 segments were analyzed for late phase enhancement abnormalities, with 91 (5.5%) segments not interpretable due to artifact. Combined grades 2 and 3 compared to grade 3 only enhancement abnormalities demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity and similar specificity for detection of infarct segments for all reconstructions evaluated. Evaluation of different voltage acquisitions demonstrated the highest diagnostic performance for the 100 kVp reconstruction which had higher diagnostic accuracy (87%; 95%CI: 80%-90%), sensitivity (86%-93%; 95%CI: 54%-78%) and specificity (90%; 95%CI: 86%-93%) compared to the other reconstructions. For sensitivity, there were significant differences noted between 100 kVp vs 140 kVp (P < 0.0005), 100 kVp vs mixed (P < 0.0001), and 100 kVp vs iodine only (P < 0.005) using combined grade 2 and grade 3 perfusion abnormalities. For specificity, there were significant differences noted between 100 kVp vs 140 kVp (P < 0.005), and 100 kVp vs mixed (P < 0.01) using combined grades 2 and 3 perfusion abnormalities.
CONCLUSION: Low voltage acquisition CT, 100 kVp in this study, demonstrates superior diagnostic performance when compared to higher and mixed voltage acquisitions for detection of prior MI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac computed tomography angiography; Dual energy computed tomography; Ischemic heart disease; Late enhancement computed tomography; Myocardial infarction

Year:  2013        PMID: 24003355      PMCID: PMC3758497          DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v5.i8.295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Radiol        ISSN: 1949-8470


  34 in total

1.  Assessment of myocardial perfusion and viability from routine contrast-enhanced 16-detector-row computed tomography of the heart: preliminary results.

Authors:  Konstantin Nikolaou; Javier Sanz; Michael Poon; Bernd J Wintersperger; Bernd Ohnesorge; Teresa Rius; Zahi A Fayad; Maximilian F Reiser; Christoph R Becker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-03-18       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Contrast-enhanced coronary artery visualization by dual-source computed tomography--initial experience.

Authors:  Stephan Achenbach; Dieter Ropers; Axel Kuettner; Thomas Flohr; Bernd Ohnesorge; Herbert Bruder; Heike Theessen; Meri Karakaya; Werner G Daniel; Werner Bautz; Willi A Kalender; Katharina Anders
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  Contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography viability imaging after myocardial infarction: characterization of myocyte death, microvascular obstruction, and chronic scar.

Authors:  Albert C Lardo; Marco A S Cordeiro; Caterina Silva; Luciano C Amado; Richard T George; Anastasios P Saliaris; Karl H Schuleri; Veronica R Fernandes; Menekhem Zviman; Saman Nazarian; Henry R Halperin; Katherine C Wu; Joshua M Hare; Joao A C Lima
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  Imaging the heart valves using ECG-gated 64-detector row cardiac CT.

Authors:  N E Manghat; V Rachapalli; R Van Lingen; A M Veitch; C A Roobottom; G J Morgan-Hughes
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Third universal definition of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Kristian Thygesen; Joseph S Alpert; Allan S Jaffe; Maarten L Simoons; Bernard R Chaitman; Harvey D White; Kristian Thygesen; Joseph S Alpert; Harvey D White; Allan S Jaffe; Hugo A Katus; Fred S Apple; Bertil Lindahl; David A Morrow; Bernard R Chaitman; Peter M Clemmensen; Per Johanson; Hanoch Hod; Richard Underwood; Jeroen J Bax; Jeroen J Bonow; Fausto Pinto; Raymond J Gibbons; Keith A Fox; Dan Atar; L Kristin Newby; Marcello Galvani; Christian W Hamm; Barry F Uretsky; Ph Gabriel Steg; William Wijns; Jean-Pierre Bassand; Phillippe Menasche; Jan Ravkilde; E Magnus Ohman; Elliott M Antman; Lars C Wallentin; Paul W Armstrong; Maarten L Simoons; James L Januzzi; Markku S Nieminen; Mihai Gheorghiade; Gerasimos Filippatos; Russell V Luepker; Stephen P Fortmann; Wayne D Rosamond; Dan Levy; David Wood; Sidney C Smith; Dayi Hu; Jose-Luis Lopez-Sendon; Rose Marie Robertson; Douglas Weaver; Michal Tendera; Alfred A Bove; Alexander N Parkhomenko; Elena J Vasilieva; Shanti Mendis; Jeroen J Bax; Helmut Baumgartner; Claudio Ceconi; Veronica Dean; Christi Deaton; Robert Fagard; Christian Funck-Brentano; David Hasdai; Arno Hoes; Paulus Kirchhof; Juhani Knuuti; Philippe Kolh; Theresa McDonagh; Cyril Moulin; Bogdan A Popescu; Zeljko Reiner; Udo Sechtem; Per Anton Sirnes; Michal Tendera; Adam Torbicki; Alec Vahanian; Stephan Windecker; Joao Morais; Carlos Aguiar; Wael Almahmeed; David O Arnar; Fabio Barili; Kenneth D Bloch; Ann F Bolger; Hans Erik Botker; Biykem Bozkurt; Raffaele Bugiardini; Christopher Cannon; James de Lemos; Franz R Eberli; Edgardo Escobar; Mark Hlatky; Stefan James; Karl B Kern; David J Moliterno; Christian Mueller; Aleksandar N Neskovic; Burkert Mathias Pieske; Steven P Schulman; Robert F Storey; Kathryn A Taubert; Pascal Vranckx; Daniel R Wagner
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Selective iodine imaging using K-edge energies in computerized x-ray tomography.

Authors:  S J Riederer; C A Mistretta
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1977 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function.

Authors:  R J Kim; D S Fieno; T B Parrish; K Harris; E L Chen; O Simonetti; J Bundy; J P Finn; F J Klocke; R M Judd
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-11-09       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Sixteen-slice spiral CT versus MR imaging for the assessment of left ventricular function in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Andreas H Mahnken; Ralf Koos; Marcus Katoh; Elmar Spuentrup; Petra Busch; Joachim E Wildberger; Harald P Kühl; Rolf W Günther
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-01-29       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source computed tomography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Thorsten R C Johnson; Konstantin Nikolaou; Stephanie Busch; Alexander W Leber; Alexander Becker; Bernd J Wintersperger; Carsten Rist; Andreas Knez; Maximilian F Reiser; Christoph R Becker
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 6.016

10.  Uptake of contrast materials by experimental acute myocardial infarctions: a preliminary report.

Authors:  C B Higgins; M Sovak; W Schmidt; P T Siemers
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1978 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.016

View more
  5 in total

1.  Automatic high-resolution infarct detection using volumetric multiphase dual-energy CT.

Authors:  Veit Sandfort; Alan C Kwan; Comfort Elumogo; Davis M Vigneault; Rolf Symons; Amir Pourmorteza; Kelly Rice; Cynthia Davies-Venn; Mark A Ahlman; Chia-Ying Liu; Stefan L Zimmerman; David A Bluemke
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2017-04-18

2.  Diagnostic accuracy of late iodine enhancement on cardiac computed tomography with a denoise filter for the evaluation of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Takuya Matsuda; Teruhito Kido; Toshihide Itoh; Hideyuki Saeki; Susumu Shigemi; Kouki Watanabe; Tomoyuki Kido; Shoji Aono; Masaya Yamamoto; Takeshi Matsuda; Teruhito Mochizuki
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Evaluation of monoenergetic late iodine enhancement dual-energy computed tomography for imaging of chronic myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Julian L Wichmann; Ruta Arbaciauskaite; J Matthias Kerl; Claudia Frellesen; Boris Bodelle; Thomas Lehnert; Nadejda Monsefi; Thomas J Vogl; Ralf W Bauer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  A Pilot Study of Third-Generation Dual-Source Computed Tomography for the Assessment of Global Dynamic Changes in Left Ventricular Structure and Function in a Porcine Model of Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Wenjia Li; Liang Lyu; Weixin Yang; Rongshun Zhang; Gang Wang; Dong Fang; Wei Song; Junkun Yin; Jiangmao Yang; Wei Li; Liling Chen; Tianyou Luo
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-10-25

5.  Factors related to the use of reperfusion strategies in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Gui-yan Yi; Xing-guang Zhang; Jian Zhang; Xian Wang
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 1.637

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.