OBJECTIVES: To evaluate image quality and diagnostic accuracy of selective monoenergetic reconstructions of late iodine enhancement (LIE) dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) for imaging of chronic myocardial infarction (CMI). METHODS: Twenty patients with a history of coronary bypass surgery underwent cardiac LIE-DECT and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). LIE-DECT images were reconstructed as selective monoenergetic spectral images with photon energies of 40, 60, 80, and 100 keV and the standard linear blending setting (M_0.6). Images were assessed for late enhancement, transmural extent, signal characteristics and subjective image quality. RESULTS: Seventy-nine myocardial segments (23 %) showed LGE. LIE-DECT detected 76 lesions. Images obtained at 80 keV and M_0.6 showed a high signal-to-noise ratio (15.9; 15.1), contrast-to-noise ratio (4.2; 4.0) and sensitivity (94.9 %; 92.4 %) while specificity was identical (99.6 %). Differences between these series were not statistically significant. Transmural extent of LIE was overestimated in both series (80 keV: 40 %; M_0.6: 35 %) in comparison to MRI. However, observers preferred 80 keV in 13/20 cases (65 %, κ = 0.634) over M_0.6 (4/20 cases) regarding subjective image quality. CONCLUSIONS: Post-processing of LIE-DECT data with selective monoenergetic reconstructions at 80 keV significantly improves subjective image quality while objective image quality shows no significant difference compared to standard linear blending. KEY POINTS: Late enhancement dual-energy CT allows for detection of chronic myocardial infarction. Monoenergetic reconstructions at 80 keV significantly improve subjective image quality. 80 keV and standard linear blending reconstructions show no significant differences. Extent of CMI detected with LIE-DECT is overestimated compared with MRI.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate image quality and diagnostic accuracy of selective monoenergetic reconstructions of late iodine enhancement (LIE) dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) for imaging of chronic myocardial infarction (CMI). METHODS: Twenty patients with a history of coronary bypass surgery underwent cardiac LIE-DECT and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). LIE-DECT images were reconstructed as selective monoenergetic spectral images with photon energies of 40, 60, 80, and 100 keV and the standard linear blending setting (M_0.6). Images were assessed for late enhancement, transmural extent, signal characteristics and subjective image quality. RESULTS: Seventy-nine myocardial segments (23 %) showed LGE. LIE-DECT detected 76 lesions. Images obtained at 80 keV and M_0.6 showed a high signal-to-noise ratio (15.9; 15.1), contrast-to-noise ratio (4.2; 4.0) and sensitivity (94.9 %; 92.4 %) while specificity was identical (99.6 %). Differences between these series were not statistically significant. Transmural extent of LIE was overestimated in both series (80 keV: 40 %; M_0.6: 35 %) in comparison to MRI. However, observers preferred 80 keV in 13/20 cases (65 %, κ = 0.634) over M_0.6 (4/20 cases) regarding subjective image quality. CONCLUSIONS: Post-processing of LIE-DECT data with selective monoenergetic reconstructions at 80 keV significantly improves subjective image quality while objective image quality shows no significant difference compared to standard linear blending. KEY POINTS: Late enhancement dual-energy CT allows for detection of chronic myocardial infarction. Monoenergetic reconstructions at 80 keV significantly improve subjective image quality. 80 keV and standard linear blending reconstructions show no significant differences. Extent of CMI detected with LIE-DECT is overestimated compared with MRI.
Authors: Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-01-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Maythem Saeed; Oliver Weber; Randall Lee; Loi Do; Alastair Martin; David Saloner; Philip Ursell; Philippe Robert; Claire Corot; Charles B Higgins Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2006-10-31 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Konstantin Nikolaou; Javier Sanz; Michael Poon; Bernd J Wintersperger; Bernd Ohnesorge; Teresa Rius; Zahi A Fayad; Maximilian F Reiser; Christoph R Becker Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2005-03-18 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Albert C Lardo; Marco A S Cordeiro; Caterina Silva; Luciano C Amado; Richard T George; Anastasios P Saliaris; Karl H Schuleri; Veronica R Fernandes; Menekhem Zviman; Saman Nazarian; Henry R Halperin; Katherine C Wu; Joshua M Hare; Joao A C Lima Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-01-24 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: J Matthias Kerl; Simon Deseive; Christa Tandi; Christina Kaiser; Mattias Kettner; Huedayi Korkusuz; Ralf Lehmann; Christopher Herzog; U Joseph Schoepf; Thomas J Vogl; Ralf W Bauer Journal: Acta Radiol Date: 2011-08-26 Impact factor: 1.990
Authors: B Shivalkar; A Maes; M Borgers; J Ausma; I Scheys; J Nuyts; L Mortelmans; W Flameng Journal: Circulation Date: 1996-08-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Fabian Bamberg; Alexander Dierks; Konstantin Nikolaou; Maximilian F Reiser; Christoph R Becker; Thorsten R C Johnson Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2011-01-20 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Changsheng Zhou; Yan E Zhao; Song Luo; Hongyuan Shi; Lin Li; Ling Zheng; Long Jiang Zhang; Guangming Lu Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Koen Nieman; Michael D Shapiro; Maros Ferencik; Cesar H Nomura; Suhny Abbara; Udo Hoffmann; Herman K Gold; Ik-Kyung Jang; Thomas J Brady; Ricardo C Cury Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: J Matthias Kerl; James G Ravenel; Shaun A Nguyen; Pal Suranyi; Christian Thilo; Philip Costello; Werner Bautz; U Joseph Schoepf Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-03-27 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Stefanie Mangold; Paola M Cannaó; U Joseph Schoepf; Julian L Wichmann; Christian Canstein; Stephen R Fuller; Giuseppe Muscogiuri; Akos Varga-Szemes; Konstantin Nikolaou; Carlo N De Cecco Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-09-15 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Tommaso D'Angelo; Giuseppe Cicero; Silvio Mazziotti; Giorgio Ascenti; Moritz H Albrecht; Simon S Martin; Ahmed E Othman; Thomas J Vogl; Julian L Wichmann Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2019-04-09 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Quynh A Truong; Wai-Ee Thai; Bryan Wai; Kevin Cordaro; Teresa Cheng; Jonathan Beaudoin; Guanglei Xiong; Jim W Cheung; Robert Altman; James K Min; Jagmeet P Singh; Conor D Barrett; Stephan Danik Journal: J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr Date: 2015-03-24
Authors: Stefanie Mangold; Carlo N De Cecco; U Joseph Schoepf; Ricardo T Yamada; Akos Varga-Szemes; Andrew C Stubenrauch; Damiano Caruso; Stephen R Fuller; Thomas J Vogl; Konstantin Nikolaou; Thomas M Todoran; Julian L Wichmann Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-03-09 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Hye-Jeong Lee; Dong Jin Im; Jong-Chan Youn; Suyon Chang; Young Joo Suh; Yoo Jin Hong; Young Jin Kim; Jin Hur; Byoung Wook Choi Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-11-22 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Simon S Martin; Moritz H Albrecht; Julian L Wichmann; Kristina Hüsers; Jan-Erik Scholtz; Christian Booz; Boris Bodelle; Ralf W Bauer; Sarah C Metzger; Thomas J Vogl; Thomas Lehnert Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-05-28 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Heejung Kim; Sung-Jin Lee; Jin Su Kim; Cynthia Davies-Venn; Hong-Jun Cho; Samuel J Won; Eden Dejene; Zhengsheng Yao; Insook Kim; Chang H Paik; David A Bluemke Journal: Nucl Med Commun Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 1.690