Literature DB >> 24002967

Visual short-term memory load strengthens selective attention.

Zachary J J Roper1, Shaun P Vecera.   

Abstract

Perceptual load theory accounts for many attentional phenomena; however, its mechanism remains elusive because it invokes underspecified attentional resources. Recent dual-task evidence has revealed that a concurrent visual short-term memory (VSTM) load slows visual search and reduces contrast sensitivity, but it is unknown whether a VSTM load also constricts attention in a canonical perceptual load task. If attentional selection draws upon VSTM resources, then distraction effects-which measure attentional "spill-over"-will be reduced as competition for resources increases. Observers performed a low perceptual load flanker task during the delay period of a VSTM change detection task. We observed a reduction of the flanker effect in the perceptual load task as a function of increasing concurrent VSTM load. These findings were not due to perceptual-level interactions between the physical displays of the two tasks. Our findings suggest that perceptual representations of distractor stimuli compete with the maintenance of visual representations held in memory. We conclude that access to VSTM determines the degree of attentional selectivity; when VSTM is not completely taxed, it is more likely for task-irrelevant items to be consolidated and, consequently, affect responses. The "resources" hypothesized by load theory are at least partly mnemonic in nature, due to the strong correspondence they share with VSTM capacity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24002967     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0503-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  25 in total

1.  Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control.

Authors:  Nilli Lavie; Aleksandra Hirst; Jan W de Fockert; Essi Viding
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2004-09

2.  A theory of visual attention.

Authors:  C Bundesen
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Diluting the burden of load: perceptual load effects are simply dilution effects.

Authors:  Yehoshua Tsal; Hanna Benoni
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

5.  Visual short-term memory load reduces retinotopic cortex response to contrast.

Authors:  Nikos Konstantinou; Bahador Bahrami; Geraint Rees; Nilli Lavie
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention.

Authors:  N Lavie
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 7.  Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention.

Authors:  N Lavie; Y Tsal
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-08

8.  Understanding the allocation of attention when faced with varying perceptual load in partial report: a computational approach.

Authors:  Søren Kyllingsbæk; Jocelyn L Sy; Barry Giesbrecht
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied.

Authors:  Geoffrey F Woodman; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-04

10.  Competition explains limited attention and perceptual resources: implications for perceptual load and dilution theories.

Authors:  Paige E Scalf; Ana Torralbo; Evelina Tapia; Diane M Beck
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-10
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Twenty years of load theory-Where are we now, and where should we go next?

Authors:  Gillian Murphy; John A Groeger; Ciara M Greene
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

Review 2.  Can automaticity be verified utilizing a perceptual load manipulation?

Authors:  Hanna Benoni
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

3.  Visual working memory load does not eliminate visuomotor repetition effects.

Authors:  Jason Rajsic; Matthew D Hilchey; Geoffrey F Woodman; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Response terminated displays unload selective attention.

Authors:  Zachary J J Roper; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-12-24

5.  Increasing Working Memory Load Reduces Processing of Cross-Modal Task-Irrelevant Stimuli Even after Controlling for Task Difficulty and Executive Capacity.

Authors:  Sharon S Simon; Erich S Tusch; Phillip J Holcomb; Kirk R Daffner
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Working memory load and distraction: dissociable effects of visual maintenance and cognitive control.

Authors:  Nikos Konstantinou; Eleanor Beal; Jean-Remi King; Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Visual Task Demands and the Auditory Mismatch Negativity: An Empirical Study and a Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Stefan Wiens; Malina Szychowska; Mats E Nilsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.