Literature DB >> 20822300

Diluting the burden of load: perceptual load effects are simply dilution effects.

Yehoshua Tsal1, Hanna Benoni.   

Abstract

The substantial distractor interference obtained for small displays when the target appears alone is reduced in large displays when the target is embedded among neutral letters. This finding has been interpreted as reflecting low-load and high-load processing, respectively, thereby supporting the theory of perceptual load (Lavie & Tsal, 1994). However, a possible alternative interpretation of this effect is that the distractor is similarly processed in both displays, yet its interference in the large ones is diluted by the presence of the neutral letters. We separated the effects of load and dilution by introducing dilution displays. They contained as many letters as the high-load displays but were clearly distinguished from the target, thus allowing for a low-load processing mode. Distractor interference obtained under both the low-load and high-load conditions disappeared under the dilution condition. Hence, the display size effect traditionally misattributed to perceptual load is fully accounted for by dilution. Furthermore, when dilution is controlled for, it is high load not low load producing greater interference.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20822300     DOI: 10.1037/a0018172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  43 in total

1.  Controlling for dilution while manipulating load: perceptual and sensory limitations are just two aspects of task difficulty.

Authors:  Hanna Benoni; Yehoshua Tsal
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-08

Review 2.  Twenty years of load theory-Where are we now, and where should we go next?

Authors:  Gillian Murphy; John A Groeger; Ciara M Greene
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

3.  Cross-modal perceptual load: the impact of modality and individual differences.

Authors:  Rajwant Sandhu; Benjamin James Dyson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The effect of visual perceptual load on auditory awareness in autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Julian Tillmann; Andrea Olguin; Jyrki Tuomainen; John Swettenham
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2015-10

5.  Attentional selection within and across hemispheres: implications for the perceptual load theory.

Authors:  Ping Wei; Guanlan Kang; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Earliest stages of visual cortical processing are not modified by attentional load.

Authors:  Yulong Ding; Antigona Martinez; Zhe Qu; Steven A Hillyard
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Nonspecific competition underlies transient attention.

Authors:  Anna Wilschut; Jan Theeuwes; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-09-04

8.  Intrinsic fluctuations in sustained attention and distractor processing.

Authors:  Michael Esterman; Monica D Rosenberg; Sarah K Noonan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  The cognitive loci of the display and task-relevant set size effects on distractor interference: Evidence from a dual-task paradigm.

Authors:  Bo Youn Park; Sujin Kim; Yang Seok Cho
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Opposing effects of memory-driven and stimulus-driven attention on distractor perception.

Authors:  Suk Won Han
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2017-09-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.