Literature DB >> 24000793

π- vs σ-radical states of one-electron-oxidized DNA/RNA bases: a density functional theory study.

Anil Kumar1, Michael D Sevilla.   

Abstract

As a result of their inherent planarity, DNA base radicals generated by one-electron oxidation/reduction or bond cleavage form π- or σ-radicals. While most DNA base systems form π-radicals, there are a number of nucleobase analogues such as one-electron-oxidized 6-azauraci1, 6-azacytosine, and 2-thiothymine or one-electron reduced 5-bromouracil that form more reactive σ-radicals. Elucidating the availability of these states within DNA, base radical electronic structure is important to the understanding of the reactivity of DNA base radicals in different environments. In this work, we address this question by the calculation of the relative energies of π- and σ-radical states in DNA/RNA bases and their analogues. We used density functional theory B3LYP/6-31++G** method to optimize the geometries of π- and σ-radicals in Cs symmetry (i.e., planar) in the gas phase and in solution using the polarized continuum model (PCM). The calculations predict that σ- and π-radical states in one-electron-oxidized bases of thymine, T(N3-H)(•), and uracil, U(N3-H)(•), are very close in energy; i.e., the π-radical is only ca. 4 kcal/mol more stable than the σ-radical. For the one-electron-oxidized radicals of cytosine, C(•+), C(N4-H)(•), adenine, A(•+), A(N6-H)(•), and guanine, G(•+), G(N2-H)(•), G(N1-H)(•), the π-radicals are ca. 16-41 kcal/mol more stable than their corresponding σ-radicals. Inclusion of solvent (PCM) is found to stabilize the π- over σ-radical of each of the systems. U(N3-H)(•) with three discrete water molecules in the gas phase is found to form a three-electron σ bond between the N3 atom of uracil and the O atom of a water molecule, but on inclusion of full solvation and discrete hydration, the π-radical remains most stable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24000793      PMCID: PMC3946539          DOI: 10.1021/jp407897n

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  25 in total

1.  Electron-transfer-induced acidity/basicity and reactivity changes of purine and pyrimidine bases. Consequences of redox processes for DNA base pairs.

Authors:  S Steenken
Journal:  Free Radic Res Commun       Date:  1992

2.  Challenges for density functional theory.

Authors:  Aron J Cohen; Paula Mori-Sánchez; Weitao Yang
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Prototropic equilibria in DNA containing one-electron oxidized GC: intra-duplex vs. duplex to solvent deprotonation.

Authors:  Amitava Adhikary; Anil Kumar; Shawn A Munafo; Deepti Khanduri; Michael D Sevilla
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.676

4.  Evidence of formation of adenine dimer cation radical in DNA: the importance of adenine base stacking.

Authors:  Kazuo Kobayashi
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 2.991

5.  Excited state proton-coupled electron transfer in 8-oxoG-C and 8-oxoG-A base pairs: a time dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) study.

Authors:  Anil Kumar; Michael D Sevilla
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Oligonucleotides containing 2-aminoadenine and 2-thiothymine act as selectively binding complementary agents.

Authors:  I V Kutyavin; R L Rhinehart; E A Lukhtanov; V V Gorn; R B Meyer; H B Gamper
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1996-08-27       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Effect of base stacking on the acid-base properties of the adenine cation radical [A*+] in solution: ESR and DFT studies.

Authors:  Amitava Adhikary; Anil Kumar; Deepti Khanduri; Michael D Sevilla
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Influence of hydration on proton transfer in the guanine-cytosine radical cation (G*+-C) base pair: a density functional theory study.

Authors:  Anil Kumar; Michael D Sevilla
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  ESR and ENDOR study of single crystals of deoxyadenosine monohydrate X-irradiated at 10 K.

Authors:  D M Close; W H Nelson; E Sagstuen; E O Hole
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.841

10.  Photoexcitation of adenine cation radical [A*+] in the near UV-vis region produces sugar radicals in adenosine and in its nucleotides.

Authors:  Amitava Adhikary; Deepti Khanduri; Anil Kumar; Michael D Sevilla
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 2.991

View more
  7 in total

1.  Traceless Tandem Lesion Formation in DNA from a Nitrogen-Centered Purine Radical.

Authors:  Liwei Zheng; Marc M Greenberg
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  Gamma and Ion-Beam Irradiation of DNA: Free Radical Mechanisms, Electron Effects, and Radiation Chemical Track Structure.

Authors:  Michael D Sevilla; David Becker; Anil Kumar; Amitava Adhikary
Journal:  Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 2.858

3.  Comment on "Proton Transfer of Guanine Radical Cations Studied by Time-Resolved Resonance Raman Spectroscopy Combined with Pulse Radiolysis".

Authors:  Michael D Sevilla; Anil Kumar; Amitava Adhikary
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  π-Radical to σ-Radical Tautomerization in One-Electron-Oxidized 1-Methylcytosine and Its Analogs.

Authors:  Amitava Adhikary; Anil Kumar; Casandra T Bishop; Tyler J Wiegand; Ragda M Hindi; Ananya Adhikary; Michael D Sevilla
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 2.991

5.  Radiation Induced One-Electron Oxidation of 2-Thiouracil in Aqueous Solutions.

Authors:  Konrad Skotnicki; Katarzyna Taras-Goslinska; Ireneusz Janik; Krzysztof Bobrowski
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 4.411

6.  Electron-Induced Repair of 2'-Deoxyribose Sugar Radicals in DNA: A Density Functional Theory (DFT) Study.

Authors:  Michael Bell; Anil Kumar; Michael D Sevilla
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  SOMO-HOMO Level Inversion in Biologically Important Radicals.

Authors:  Anil Kumar; Michael D Sevilla
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 2.991

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.