BACKGROUND: Critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) was recently added to the U.S. Recommended Uniform Screening Panel for newborns. States considering screening requirements may want more information about the potential impact of screening. This study examined potentially avoidable mortality among infants with late detected CCHD and assessed whether late detection was associated with increased hospital resource use during infancy. METHODS: This was a state-wide, population-based, observational study of infants with CCHD (n = 3603) born 1998 to 2007 identified by the Florida Birth Defects Registry. We examined 12 CCHD conditions that are targets of newborn screening. Late detection was defined as CCHD diagnosis after the birth hospitalization. Deaths potentially avoidable through screening were defined as those that occurred outside a hospital following birth hospitalization discharge and those that occurred within 3 days of an emergency readmission. RESULTS: For 23% (n = 825) of infants, CCHD was not detected during the birth hospitalization. Death occurred among 20% (n = 568/2,778) of infants with timely detected CCHD and 8% (n = 66/825) of infants with late detected CCHD, unadjusted for clinical characteristics. Potentially preventable deaths occurred in 1.8% (n = 15/825) of infants with late detected CCHD (0.4% of all infants with CCHD). In multivariable models adjusted for selected characteristics, late CCHD detection was significantly associated with 52% more admissions, 18% more hospitalized days, and 35% higher inpatient costs during infancy. CONCLUSION: Increased CCHD detection at birth hospitals through screening may lead to decreased hospital costs and avoid some deaths during infancy. Additional studies conducted after screening implementation are needed to confirm these findings.
BACKGROUND:Critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) was recently added to the U.S. Recommended Uniform Screening Panel for newborns. States considering screening requirements may want more information about the potential impact of screening. This study examined potentially avoidable mortality among infants with late detected CCHD and assessed whether late detection was associated with increased hospital resource use during infancy. METHODS: This was a state-wide, population-based, observational study of infants with CCHD (n = 3603) born 1998 to 2007 identified by the Florida Birth Defects Registry. We examined 12 CCHD conditions that are targets of newborn screening. Late detection was defined as CCHD diagnosis after the birth hospitalization. Deaths potentially avoidable through screening were defined as those that occurred outside a hospital following birth hospitalization discharge and those that occurred within 3 days of an emergency readmission. RESULTS: For 23% (n = 825) of infants, CCHD was not detected during the birth hospitalization. Death occurred among 20% (n = 568/2,778) of infants with timely detected CCHD and 8% (n = 66/825) of infants with late detected CCHD, unadjusted for clinical characteristics. Potentially preventable deaths occurred in 1.8% (n = 15/825) of infants with late detected CCHD (0.4% of all infants with CCHD). In multivariable models adjusted for selected characteristics, late CCHD detection was significantly associated with 52% more admissions, 18% more hospitalized days, and 35% higher inpatient costs during infancy. CONCLUSION: Increased CCHD detection at birth hospitals through screening may lead to decreased hospital costs and avoid some deaths during infancy. Additional studies conducted after screening implementation are needed to confirm these findings.
Authors: Matthew E Oster; Kyung A Lee; Margaret A Honein; Tiffany Riehle-Colarusso; Mikyong Shin; Adolfo Correa Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2013-04-22 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Mark K Friedberg; Norman H Silverman; Anita J Moon-Grady; Elizabeth Tong; Jennifer Nourse; Beatrice Sorenson; Jaimie Lee; Lisa K Hornberger Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2009-04-24 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Matthew J Strickland; Tiffany J Riehle-Colarusso; Jeffrey P Jacobs; Mark D Reller; William T Mahle; Lorenzo D Botto; Paige E Tolbert; Marshall L Jacobs; Francois G Lacour-Gayet; Christo I Tchervenkov; Constantine Mavroudis; Adolfo Correa Journal: Cardiol Young Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 1.093
Authors: Franklin Pereira; Alejandra Bueno; Andrea Rodriguez; Douglas Perrin; Gerald Marx; Michael Cardinale; Ivan Salgo; Pedro Del Nido Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2017-01-24
Authors: Cora Peterson; Scott D Grosse; Jill Glidewell; Lorraine F Garg; Kim Van Naarden Braun; Mary M Knapp; Leslie M Beres; Cynthia F Hinton; Richard S Olney; Cynthia H Cassell Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2014 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Jason L Salemi; Rachel E Rutkowski; Jean Paul Tanner; Jennifer L Matas; Russell S Kirby Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2018-04-05 Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Monica R McClain; John S Hokanson; Regina Grazel; Kim Van Naarden Braun; Lorraine F Garg; Michelle R Morris; Kathleen Moline; Keri Urquhart; Amy Nance; Harper Randall; Marci K Sontag Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2017-06
Authors: Matthew J Campbell; William O Quarshie; Jennifer Faerber; David J Goldberg; Christopher E Mascio; Joshua J Blinder Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2020-02-27 Impact factor: 1.655