The global fold of human cannabinoid type 2 (CB2 ) receptor in the agonist-bound active state in lipid bilayers was investigated by solid-state (13)C- and (15)N magic-angle spinning (MAS) NMR, in combination with chemical-shift prediction from a structural model of the receptor obtained by microsecond-long molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Uniformly (13)C- and (15)N-labeled CB2 receptor was expressed in milligram quantities by bacterial fermentation, purified, and functionally reconstituted into liposomes. (13)C MAS NMR spectra were recorded without sensitivity enhancement for direct comparison of Cα, Cβ, and C=O bands of superimposed resonances with predictions from protein structures generated by MD. The experimental NMR spectra matched the calculated spectra reasonably well indicating agreement of the global fold of the protein between experiment and simulations. In particular, the (13) C chemical shift distribution of Cα resonances was shown to be very sensitive to both the primary amino acid sequence and the secondary structure of CB2. Thus the shape of the Cα band can be used as an indicator of CB2 global fold. The prediction from MD simulations indicated that upon receptor activation a rather limited number of amino acid residues, mainly located in the extracellular Loop 2 and the second half of intracellular Loop 3, change their chemical shifts significantly (≥ 1.5 ppm for carbons and ≥ 5.0 ppm for nitrogens). Simulated two-dimensional (13) Cα(i)-(13)C=O(i) and (13)C=O(i)-(15)NH(i + 1) dipolar-interaction correlation spectra provide guidance for selective amino acid labeling and signal assignment schemes to study the molecular mechanism of activation of CB2 by solid-state MAS NMR.
The global fold of humann class="Gene">cannabinoid type 2 (CB2 ) receptor in the agonist-bound active state in lipid bilayers was investigated by solid-state (13)C- and (15)N magic-angle spinning (MAS) NMR, in combination with chemical-shift prediction from a structural model of the receptor obtained by microsecond-long molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Uniformly (13)C- and (15)N-labeled CB2 receptor was expressed in milligram quantities by bacterial fermentation, purified, and functionally reconstituted into liposomes. (13)C MAS NMR spectra were recorded without sensitivity enhancement for direct comparison of Cα, Cβ, and C=O bands of superimposed resonances with predictions from protein structures generated by MD. The experimental NMR spectra matched the calculated spectra reasonably well indicating agreement of the global fold of the protein between experiment and simulations. In particular, the (13) C chemical shift distribution of Cα resonances was shown to be very sensitive to both the primary amino acid sequence and the secondary structure of CB2. Thus the shape of the Cα band can be used as an indicator of CB2 global fold. The prediction from MD simulations indicated that upon receptor activation a rather limited number of amino acid residues, mainly located in the extracellular Loop 2 and the second half of intracellular Loop 3, change their chemical shifts significantly (≥ 1.5 ppm for carbons and ≥ 5.0 ppm for nitrogens). Simulated two-dimensional (13) Cα(i)-(13)C=O(i) and (13)C=O(i)-(15)NH(i + 1) dipolar-interaction correlation spectra provide guidance for selective amino acid labeling and signal assignment schemes to study the molecular mechanism of activation of CB2 by solid-state MAS NMR.
Authors: Ntsang M Nebane; Dow P Hurst; Carl A Carrasquer; Zhuanhong Qiao; Patricia H Reggio; Zhao-Hui Song Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2008-12-30 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Karsten Seidel; Manuel Etzkorn; Robert Schneider; Christian Ader; Marc Baldus Journal: Solid State Nucl Magn Reson Date: 2009-01-20 Impact factor: 2.293
Authors: Jung Hee Park; Patrick Scheerer; Klaus Peter Hofmann; Hui-Woog Choe; Oliver Peter Ernst Journal: Nature Date: 2008-06-18 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Tony Warne; Maria J Serrano-Vega; Jillian G Baker; Rouslan Moukhametzianov; Patricia C Edwards; Richard Henderson; Andrew G W Leslie; Christopher G Tate; Gebhard F X Schertler Journal: Nature Date: 2008-06-25 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Veli-Pekka Jaakola; Mark T Griffith; Michael A Hanson; Vadim Cherezov; Ellen Y T Chien; J Robert Lane; Adriaan P Ijzerman; Raymond C Stevens Journal: Science Date: 2008-10-02 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Ying Pei; Richard W Mercier; Jenine K Anday; Ganesh A Thakur; Alexander M Zvonok; Dow Hurst; Patricia H Reggio; David R Janero; Alexandros Makriyannis Journal: Chem Biol Date: 2008-11-24
Authors: Shivani Ahuja; Viktor Hornak; Elsa C Y Yan; Natalie Syrett; Joseph A Goncalves; Amiram Hirshfeld; Martine Ziliox; Thomas P Sakmar; Mordechai Sheves; Philip J Reeves; Steven O Smith; Markus Eilers Journal: Nat Struct Mol Biol Date: 2009-02-01 Impact factor: 15.369
Authors: Katrina E Fracchiolla; Leah S Cohen; Boris Arshava; Martin Poms; Oliver Zerbe; Jeffrey M Becker; Fred Naider Journal: J Pept Sci Date: 2015-02-02 Impact factor: 1.905