Aaron Yu-Jen Wu1, Heng-Li Huang2, Jui-Ting Hsu2, Winston Chee3,4. 1. Department of Dentistry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. 2. School of Dentistry, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan. 3. Ostrow School of Dentistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. wchee@usc.edu. 4. Center for Prosthetic Dentistry, Glendale, CA, USA. wchee@usc.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Small-diameter implants have been available since the 1990s, but few studies have analyzed their mechanical properties. This study evaluated the effects of the implant material and the implant-abutment connection designs on the primary stability and the marginal bone strain of small-diameter implant subject to immediate loading. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Insertion torque value (ITV), implant stability quotient (ISQ), and Periotest value (PTV) of three implant systems with four parameters (titanium, titanium alloy, internal and external hexagon connections) were measured after placing implants into artificial type 2 jaw-bone models. Specimens were tested under both vertical and oblique static loads at 190 N. Peak values of the principal bone strain were recorded and analyzed statistically by the Kruskal-Wallis test and multiple-comparisons Bonferroni test. RESULTS: PTV and ISQ were higher for the NIOSM311 (internal-hex and Ti alloy) and FOSM311 (external-hex and pure Ti) implants, respectively, than for the NOSM311 (external-hex and Ti alloy) implant. Under vertical loading the peak value of peri-implant bone strains did not differ significantly among these three implant systems. However, the peak bone strains were at least 32 % lower for the NIOSM311 and FOSM311 implants than for the NOSM311 implant under lateral loading. CONCLUSIONS: The implant material and the implant-abutment connection design significantly influence the peri-implant bone strain of immediately loaded small-diameter implants, but barely affect their primary stability. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A commercially pure titanium implant with an internal connection has the potential to reduce the risk of implant failure of small-diameter implant related to biomechanical complications.
OBJECTIVE: Small-diameter implants have been available since the 1990s, but few studies have analyzed their mechanical properties. This study evaluated the effects of the implant material and the implant-abutment connection designs on the primary stability and the marginal bone strain of small-diameter implant subject to immediate loading. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Insertion torque value (ITV), implant stability quotient (ISQ), and Periotest value (PTV) of three implant systems with four parameters (titanium, titanium alloy, internal and external hexagon connections) were measured after placing implants into artificial type 2 jaw-bone models. Specimens were tested under both vertical and oblique static loads at 190 N. Peak values of the principal bone strain were recorded and analyzed statistically by the Kruskal-Wallis test and multiple-comparisons Bonferroni test. RESULTS: PTV and ISQ were higher for the NIOSM311 (internal-hex and Ti alloy) and FOSM311 (external-hex and pure Ti) implants, respectively, than for the NOSM311 (external-hex and Ti alloy) implant. Under vertical loading the peak value of peri-implant bone strains did not differ significantly among these three implant systems. However, the peak bone strains were at least 32 % lower for the NIOSM311 and FOSM311 implants than for the NOSM311 implant under lateral loading. CONCLUSIONS: The implant material and the implant-abutment connection design significantly influence the peri-implant bone strain of immediately loaded small-diameter implants, but barely affect their primary stability. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A commercially pure titanium implant with an internal connection has the potential to reduce the risk of implant failure of small-diameter implant related to biomechanical complications.