Literature DB >> 19548411

Fracture resistance of the implant-abutment connection in implants with internal hex and internal conical connections under oblique compressive loading: an in vitro study.

Abílio Ricciardi Coppedê1, Edmilson Bersani, Maria da Gloria Chiarello de Mattos, Renata Cristina Silveira Rodrigues, Ivete Aparecida de Mattias Sartori, Ricardo Faria Ribeiro.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to verify if differences in the design of internal hex (IH) and internal conical (IC) connection implant systems influence fracture resistance under oblique compressive forces. Twenty implant-abutment assemblies were utilized: 10 with IH connections and 10 with IC connections. Maximum deformation force for IC implants (90.58 +/- 6.72 kgf) was statistically higher than that for IH implants (83.73 +/- 4.94 kgf) (P = .0182). Fracture force for the IH implants was 79.86 +/- 4.77 kgf. None of the IC implants fractured. The friction-locking mechanics and the solid design of the IC abutments provided greater resistance to deformation and fracture under oblique compressive loading when compared to the IH abutments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19548411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Prosthodont        ISSN: 0893-2174            Impact factor:   1.681


  15 in total

1.  Biomechanical effects of the implant material and implant-abutment interface in immediately loaded small-diameter implants.

Authors:  Aaron Yu-Jen Wu; Heng-Li Huang; Jui-Ting Hsu; Winston Chee
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Mechanical analysis of conventional and small diameter conical implant abutments.

Authors:  Izabela Cristina Maurício Moris; Adriana Cláudia Lapria Faria; Maria da Gloria Chiarello de Mattos; Ricardo Faria Ribeiro; Renata Cristina Silveira Rodrigues
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 1.904

Review 3.  Implant-abutment connections on single crowns: a systematic review.

Authors:  F M Ceruso; P Barnaba; S Mazzoleni; L Ottria; M Gargari; A Zuccon; G Bruno; A DI Fiore
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2017-01-21

4.  A Finite Element Stress Analysis of a Concical Triangular Connection in Implants: A New Proposal.

Authors:  Romy Angeles Maslucan; John Alexis Dominguez
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 3.748

5.  Stress analysis and factor of safety in three dental implant systems by finite element analysis.

Authors:  E Menacho-Mendoza; R Cedamanos-Cuenca; A Díaz-Suyo
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2022-08-27

Review 6.  Is the internal connection more efficient than external connection in mechanical, biological, and esthetical point of views? A systematic review.

Authors:  Marcelo Coelho Goiato; Eduardo Piza Pellizzer; Emily Vivianne Freitas da Silva; Liliane da Rocha Bonatto; Daniela Micheline dos Santos
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-04-25

7.  A three-dimensional finite element analysis of a passive and friction fit implant abutment interface and the influence of occlusal table dimension on the stress distribution pattern on the implant and surrounding bone.

Authors:  Hasan Sarfaraz; Anoopa Paulose; K Kamalakanth Shenoy; Akhter Hussain
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

8.  The fracture strength by a torsion test at the implant-abutment interface.

Authors:  Fumihiko Watanabe; Kazuhiko Hiroyasu; Kazuhiko Ueda
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2015-10-10

9.  Morse taper performance: A finite element analysis study.

Authors:  Gustavo Passarelli Petris; João Paulo De Carli; Luiz Renato Paranhos; Pâmela Letícia Santos; Paula Benetti; Marcio Walber; Eduardo Sandini Linden; Maria Salete Sandini Linden
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 2.365

10.  The compressive strength of implant-abutment complex with different connection designs.

Authors:  Hsien-Ching Hung; Chiung-Shing Huang; Yu-Hwa Pan
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 2.080

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.