Literature DB >> 20666787

Factors influencing resonance frequency analysis assessed by Osstell mentor during implant tissue integration: II. Implant surface modifications and implant diameter.

Jie Han1, Martina Lulic, Niklaus P Lang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To monitor the development of the stability of Straumann tissue-level implants during the early phases of healing by resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and to determine the influence of implant surface modification and diameter.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of twenty-five 10 mm length implants including 12 SLA RN v4.1 mm implants, eight SLActive RN v4.1 mm implants and five SLA WN v4.8 mm implants were placed. Implant stability quotient (ISQ) values were determined with Osstell mentor at baseline, 4 days, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 12 weeks post-surgery. ISQ values were compared between implant types using unpaired t-tests and longitudinally within implant types using paired t-tests.
RESULTS: During healing, ISQ decreased by 3-4 values after installation and reached the lowest values at 3 weeks. Following this, the ISQ values increased steadily for all implants and up to 12 weeks. No significant differences were noted over time. The longitudinal changes in the ISQ values showed the same patterns for SLA implants, SLActive implants and WB implants. At placement, the mean ISQ values were 72.6, 75.7 and 74.4, respectively. The mean lowest ISQ values, recorded at 3 weeks, were 69.9, 71.4 and 69.8, respectively. At 12 weeks, the mean ISQ values were 76.5, 78.8 and 77.8, respectively. The mean ISQ values at all observation periods did not differ significantly among the various types. Single ISQ values ranged from 55 to 84 during the entire healing period. Pocket probing depths of the implants ranged from 1 to 3 mm and bleeding on probing from 0 to 2 sites/implant post-surgically.
CONCLUSIONS: All ISQ values indicated the stability of Straumann implants over a 12-week healing period. All implants showed a slight decrease after installation, with the lowest ISQ values being reached at 3 weeks. ISQ values were restored 8 weeks post-surgically. It is recommended to monitor implant stability by RFA at 3 and 8 weeks post-surgically. However, neither implant surface modifications (SLActive) nor implant diameter were revealed by RFA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20666787     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01909.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  23 in total

1.  Biomechanical effects of the implant material and implant-abutment interface in immediately loaded small-diameter implants.

Authors:  Aaron Yu-Jen Wu; Heng-Li Huang; Jui-Ting Hsu; Winston Chee
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Measurements of Implant Stability Following Sinus Lift: A Pilot Clinical Study.

Authors:  Muhamed Ajanović; Alma Kamber-Ćesir; Adis Hamzić; Selma Tosum
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2015-09

3.  Peri-implant versus periodontal wound healing.

Authors:  Pinar Emecen-Huja; Tim D Eubank; Vladimir Shapiro; Vedat Yildiz; Dimitris N Tatakis; Binnaz Leblebicioglu
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 8.728

4.  In vivo evaluation of quantitative percussion diagnostics for determining implant stability.

Authors:  Lindsey R VanSchoiack; Veronica I Shubayev; Robert R Myers; Cherilyn G Sheets; James C Earthman
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Mini-implant stability at the initial healing period: a clinical pilot study.

Authors:  Manuel Nienkemper; Benedict Wilmes; Alexander Pauls; Dieter Drescher
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  A Radiographic and Clinical Comparison of Immediate vs. Early Loading (4 Weeks) of Implants with a New Thermo-Chemically Treated Surface: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Matteo Albertini; Federico Herrero-Climent; Carmen María Díaz-Castro; Jose Nart; Ana Fernández-Palacín; José Vicente Ríos-Santos; Mariano Herrero-Climent
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Impact of mini-implant length on stability at the initial healing period: a controlled clinical study.

Authors:  Manuel Nienkemper; Benedict Wilmes; Alexander Pauls; Dieter Drescher
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2013-10-20       Impact factor: 2.151

8.  A new wide-diameter bone-anchored hearing implant-prospective 1-year data on complications, implant stability, and survival.

Authors:  Søren Foghsgaard; Per Caye-Thomasen
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Current knowledge about the hydrophilic and nanostructured SLActive surface.

Authors:  Ann Wennerberg; Silvia Galli; Tomas Albrektsson
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2011-09-05

10.  Comparison of Implant Stability Using Resonance Frequency Analysis: Osteotome Versus Conventional Drilling.

Authors:  Rokhsareh Sadeghi; Amir Reza Rokn; Asghar Miremadi
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2015-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.