Literature DB >> 23998845

Risk of uterine cancer in symptomatic women in primary care: case-control study using electronic records.

Sarah Walker1, Chris Hyde, William Hamilton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Uterine cancer is the fourth most common cancer in women in the UK, with approximately 7700 new diagnoses and 1700 deaths annually. AIM: To identify and quantify features of uterine cancer in primary care. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Case-control study using electronic primary care records in primary care in the UK.
METHOD: Putative features of uterine cancer were identified in the year before diagnosis, and odds ratios (ORs) calculated using conditional logistic regression. Positive predictive values (PPVs) were calculated for women who consulted.
RESULTS: A total of 2732 women aged ≥40 years with uterine cancer between 2000 and 2009, and 9537 age-, sex- and practice-matched controls were selected from the General Practice Research Database. The median age at diagnosis was 67 years. Nine features were significantly associated with uterine cancer: postmenopausal bleeding (OR = 160; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 100 to 240), excessive vaginal bleeding (OR = 22; 95% CI = 12 to 42), irregular menstruation (OR = 42; 95% CI = 27 to -63), vaginal discharge (OR = 14; 95% CI = 10 to 21), haematuria (OR = 8.7; 95% CI = 5.0 to 15), abdominal pain (OR = 2.0; 95% CI = 1.4 to 2.8), low haemoglobin (OR = 2.1; 95% CI = 1.5 to 2.9), raised platelets (OR = 1.5; 95% CI = 1.0 to 2.3), and raised glucose (OR = 1.4; 95% CI = 1.1 to 1.8); all P<0.01, other than raised platelets, P = 0.05 and raised glucose, P = 0.02. In the year before diagnosis, 1725 (63%) cases had a record of abnormal vaginal bleeding compared to 135 (1%) controls. The PPV of uterine cancer with postmenopausal bleeding was 4%, and was higher in women with multiple or repeated symptoms.
CONCLUSION: This study confirms the importance of several features, particularly postmenopausal bleeding, for uterine cancer. Haematuria is an important risk marker. The results of this study may inform GPs in the selection of women for investigation and should assist the NICE in their update of GP referral guidance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23998845      PMCID: PMC3750804          DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X671632

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  23 in total

1.  Evaluation of a one-stop clinic for the rapid assessment of post-menopausal bleeding.

Authors:  W U Atiomo; R Shrestha; A D Falconer
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  What are the clinical features of lung cancer before the diagnosis is made? A population based case-control study.

Authors:  W Hamilton; T J Peters; A Round; D Sharp
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2005-10-14       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  Diagnostic delay experienced among gynecological cancer patients: a nationwide survey in Denmark.

Authors:  Kirstine M Robinson; Bent Ottesen; Karl Bang Christensen; Allan Krasnik
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.636

4.  Rectal and postmenopausal bleeding: consultation and referral of patients with and without severe mental health problems.

Authors:  Chris Parker; Julia Hippisley-Cox; Carol Coupland; Yana Vinogradova
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Differential trends in the rising incidence of endometrial cancer by type: data from a UK population-based registry from 1994 to 2006.

Authors:  T Evans; O Sany; P Pearmain; R Ganesan; A Blann; S Sundar
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Using free text information to explore how and when GPs code a diagnosis of ovarian cancer: an observational study using primary care records of patients with ovarian cancer.

Authors:  A Rosemary Tate; Alexander G R Martin; Aishath Ali; Jackie A Cassell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Risk of ovarian cancer in women with symptoms in primary care: population based case-control study.

Authors:  William Hamilton; Tim J Peters; Clare Bankhead; Deborah Sharp
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-08-25

8.  Variation in number of general practitioner consultations before hospital referral for cancer: findings from the 2010 National Cancer Patient Experience Survey in England.

Authors:  Georgios Lyratzopoulos; Richard D Neal; Josephine M Barbiere; Gregory P Rubin; Gary A Abel
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  Validation of the diagnosis of autism in general practitioner records.

Authors:  Eric Fombonne; Lisa Heavey; Liam Smeeth; Laura C Rodrigues; Claire Cook; Peter G Smith; Linyan Meng; Andrew J Hall
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2004-03-03       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  The importance of anaemia in diagnosing colorectal cancer: a case-control study using electronic primary care records.

Authors:  W Hamilton; R Lancashire; D Sharp; T J Peters; K K Cheng; T Marshall
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  20 in total

1.  Cancer diagnostic tools to aid decision-making in primary care: mixed-methods systematic reviews and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Antonieta Medina-Lara; Bogdan Grigore; Ruth Lewis; Jaime Peters; Sarah Price; Paolo Landa; Sophie Robinson; Richard Neal; William Hamilton; Anne E Spencer
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  Quantifying the risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in symptomatic primary care patients aged ≥40 years: a large case-control study using electronic records.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Shephard; Richard D Neal; Peter W Rose; Fiona M Walter; William T Hamilton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Quantifying the risk of multiple myeloma from symptoms reported in primary care patients: a large case-control study using electronic records.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Shephard; Richard D Neal; Peter Rose; Fiona M Walter; Emma J Litt; William T Hamilton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Quadruple synchronous primary cancers in a single patient.

Authors:  Elin Albertsdottir; Jacob Juel
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2020-04-29

5.  Symptom lead times in lung and colorectal cancers: what are the benefits of symptom-based approaches to early diagnosis?

Authors:  M Biswas; A E Ades; W Hamilton
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Cancer detection in primary care: insights from general practitioners.

Authors:  T Green; K Atkin; U Macleod
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  The relative length of the patient and the primary care interval in patients with 28 common and rarer cancers.

Authors:  G Lyratzopoulos; C L Saunders; G A Abel; S McPhail; R D Neal; J Wardle; G P Rubin
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Is omission of free text records a possible source of data loss and bias in Clinical Practice Research Datalink studies? A case-control study.

Authors:  Sarah J Price; Sal A Stapley; Elizabeth Shephard; Kevin Barraclough; William T Hamilton
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Symptoms, signs, and tests: The general practitioner's comprehensive approach towards a cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Benedicte Iversen Scheel; Knut Holtedahl
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 2.581

10.  Quantifying the risk of Hodgkin lymphoma in symptomatic primary care patients aged ≥40 years: a case-control study using electronic records.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Shephard; Richard D Neal; Peter W Rose; Fiona M Walter; William T Hamilton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.