Literature DB >> 25624306

Quantifying the risk of multiple myeloma from symptoms reported in primary care patients: a large case-control study using electronic records.

Elizabeth A Shephard1, Richard D Neal2, Peter Rose3, Fiona M Walter4, Emma J Litt5, William T Hamilton1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with myeloma experience the longest diagnostic delays compared with patients with other cancers in the UK; 37% are diagnosed through emergency presentations. AIM: To identify and quantify the risk of myeloma from specific clinical features reported by primary care patients. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Matched case-control study using General Practice Research Database primary care electronic records.
METHOD: Putative clinical features of myeloma were identified and analysed using conditional logistic regression. Positive predictive values (PPVs) were calculated for the consulting population.
RESULTS: A total of 2703 patients aged ≥40 years, diagnosed with myeloma between 2000 and 2009, and 12 157 age, sex, and general practice-matched controls were identified. Sixteen features were independently associated with myeloma: hypercalcaemia, odds ratio 11.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 7.1 to 18), cytopenia 5.4 (95% CI = 4.6 to 6.4), raised inflammatory markers 4.9 (95% CI = 4.2 to 5.8), fracture 3.1 (95% CI = 2.3 to 4.2), raised mean corpuscular volume 3.1 (95% CI = 2.4 to 4.1), weight loss 3.0 (95% CI = 2.0 to 4.5), nosebleeds 3.0 (95% CI = 1.9 to 4.7), rib pain 2.5 (95% CI = 1.5 to 4.4), back pain 2.2 (95% CI = 2.0 to 2.4), other bone pain 2.1 (95% CI = 1.4 to 3.1), raised creatinine 1.8 (95% CI = 1.5 to 2.2), chest pain 1.6 (95% CI = 1.4 to 1.8), joint pain 1.6 (95% CI = 1.2 to 2.2), nausea 1.5 (95% CI = 1.1 to 2.1), chest infection 1.4 (95% CI = 1.2 to 1.6), and shortness of breath 1.3 (95% CI = 1.1 to 1.5). Individual symptom PPVs were generally <1%, although were >10% for some symptoms when combined with leucopenia or hypercalcaemia.
CONCLUSION: Individual symptoms of myeloma in primary care are generally low risk, probably explaining diagnostic delays. Once simple primary care blood tests are taken, risk estimates change. Hypercalcaemia and leucopenia are particularly important abnormalities, and coupled with symptoms, strongly suggest myeloma. © British Journal of General Practice 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood tests; diagnosis; hypercalcaemia; leucopenia; multiple myeloma; primary health care

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25624306      PMCID: PMC4325456          DOI: 10.3399/bjgp15X683545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  24 in total

1.  Raised inflammatory markers.

Authors:  Jessica Watson; Alison Round; William Hamilton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-02-03

2.  Clinical features of kidney cancer in primary care: a case-control study using primary care records.

Authors:  Elizabeth Shephard; Richard Neal; Peter Rose; Fiona Walter; William T Hamilton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Clinical features of primary brain tumours: a case-control study using electronic primary care records.

Authors:  William Hamilton; David Kernick
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) consistently precedes multiple myeloma: a prospective study.

Authors:  Ola Landgren; Robert A Kyle; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Jerry A Katzmann; Neil E Caporaso; Richard B Hayes; Angela Dispenzieri; Shaji Kumar; Raynell J Clark; Dalsu Baris; Robert Hoover; S Vincent Rajkumar
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 5.  Multiple myeloma: from diagnosis to treatment.

Authors:  Renee Eslick; Dipti Talaulikar
Journal:  Aust Fam Physician       Date:  2013-10

6.  Routes to diagnosis for cancer - determining the patient journey using multiple routine data sets.

Authors:  L Elliss-Brookes; S McPhail; A Ives; M Greenslade; J Shelton; S Hiom; M Richards
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Clinical features of bladder cancer in primary care.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Shephard; Sally Stapley; Richard D Neal; Peter Rose; Fiona M Walter; William T Hamilton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  The risk of oesophago-gastric cancer in symptomatic patients in primary care: a large case-control study using electronic records.

Authors:  S Stapley; T J Peters; R D Neal; P W Rose; F M Walter; W Hamilton
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Clinical features of colorectal cancer before diagnosis: a population-based case-control study.

Authors:  W Hamilton; A Round; D Sharp; T J Peters
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  The importance of anaemia in diagnosing colorectal cancer: a case-control study using electronic primary care records.

Authors:  W Hamilton; R Lancashire; D Sharp; T J Peters; K K Cheng; T Marshall
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  31 in total

1.  Comorbid conditions delay diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a cohort study using electronic primary care records.

Authors:  Luke T A Mounce; Sarah Price; Jose M Valderas; William Hamilton
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 7.640

2.  Electronic patient records research to aid diagnostic reasoning for possible cancer in primary care.

Authors:  Georgios Lyratzopoulos
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  Improving early diagnosis of symptomatic cancer.

Authors:  Willie Hamilton; Fiona M Walter; Greg Rubin; Richard D Neal
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  Educational intervention to optimise serum immunoglobulin test use in Irish primary care: an interrupted time series with segmented regression analysis.

Authors:  Sharon L Cadogan; John P Browne; Colin P Bradley; Anthony P Fitzgerald; Mary R Cahill
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Recognising laryngeal cancer in primary care: a large case-control study using electronic records.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Shephard; Molly Al Parkinson; William T Hamilton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Selection of men for investigation of possible testicular cancer in primary care: a large case-control study using electronic patient records.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Shephard; William T Hamilton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Cancer diagnostic tools to aid decision-making in primary care: mixed-methods systematic reviews and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Antonieta Medina-Lara; Bogdan Grigore; Ruth Lewis; Jaime Peters; Sarah Price; Paolo Landa; Sophie Robinson; Richard Neal; William Hamilton; Anne E Spencer
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 4.014

8.  Weight loss as a predictor of cancer in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Brian D Nicholson; William Hamilton; Jack O'Sullivan; Paul Aveyard; Fd Richard Hobbs
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 9.  Using Electronic Health Records for Population Health Research: A Review of Methods and Applications.

Authors:  Joan A Casey; Brian S Schwartz; Walter F Stewart; Nancy E Adler
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 21.981

10.  Excluding myeloma diagnosis using revised thresholds for serum free light chain ratios and M-protein levels.

Authors:  Jennifer L J Heaney; Alex Richter; Stella Bowcock; Guy Pratt; J Anthony Child; Graham Jackson; Gareth Morgan; Ingemar Turesson; Mark T Drayson
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 9.941

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.