Literature DB >> 17504587

Rectal and postmenopausal bleeding: consultation and referral of patients with and without severe mental health problems.

Chris Parker1, Julia Hippisley-Cox, Carol Coupland, Yana Vinogradova.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: People with severe mental health problems receive less effective care for some physical conditions. There is concern that this could apply to rectal bleeding or postmenopausal bleeding. Published estimates of consultation rates and outcomes for these symptoms vary widely. AIM: To estimate rates of first-ever consultation for rectal bleeding and postmenopausal bleeding in general practice, together with subsequent referrals and outcomes. To identify inequalities for patients with severe mental health problems. DESIGN OF STUDY: Cohort study.
SETTING: Primary care.
METHOD: Patients with first-ever consultations for rectal or postmenopausal bleeding were identified among more than 3 million patients from 328 practices contributing routine data to the QRESEARCH database. Their records were followed for 2 years.
RESULTS: There were 30 175 first consultations for rectal bleeding (2.6 per thousand patients per year at age 25-29 years, rising to 4.8 over age 85 years) and 10 142 for postmenopausal bleeding (highest at 7.4 per thousand per year aged 55-59 years). Overall, 2.2% of those with rectal bleeding and 1.7% of those with postmenopausal bleeding went on to have a relevant cancer diagnosis within 2 years. Cancer risk was strongly related to age, and was higher for males with rectal bleeding than females with rectal bleeding. Recorded referrals were at similar rates among patients with and without severe mental health problems.
CONCLUSION: The rate of first consultations for rectal bleeding or postmenopausal bleeding is relatively low. Less than 2.5% overall have a relevant cancer diagnosis within 2 years. There is no evidence of inequality in referral for patients with severe mental health problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17504587      PMCID: PMC2047011     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  18 in total

1.  A comparison of research general practices and their patients with other practices--a cross-sectional survey in Trent.

Authors:  Vicky Hammersley; Julia Hippisley-Cox; Andrew Wilson; Mike Pringle
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  QRESEARCH: a new general practice database for research.

Authors:  Julia Hippisley-Cox; David Stables; Mike Pringle
Journal:  Inform Prim Care       Date:  2004

3.  Factors identifying higher risk rectal bleeding in general practice.

Authors:  Brian G Ellis; Michael R Thompson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Excess cancer mortality in Western Australian psychiatric patients due to higher case fatality rates.

Authors:  D Lawrence; C D Holman; A V Jablensky; T J Threlfall; S A Fuller
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.392

5.  Probability analysis for diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia and cancer in postmenopausal bleeding: an approach for a rational diagnostic workup.

Authors:  Lucas M Bachmann; Gerben ter Riet; T Justin Clark; Janesh K Gupta; Khalid S Khan
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.636

6.  Diagnosis of colorectal cancer in primary care: the evidence base for guidelines.

Authors:  William Hamilton; Deborah Sharp
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.267

7.  Prevalence, care, and outcomes for patients with diet-controlled diabetes in general practice: cross sectional survey.

Authors:  J Hippisley-Cox; M Pringle
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004 Jul 31-Aug 6       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Frequency of spontaneously occurring postmenopausal bleeding in the general population.

Authors:  Karen Astrup; Niels de Fne Olivarius
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 9.  Occurrence and clinical significance of overt blood loss per rectum in the general population and in medical practice.

Authors:  G H Fijten; G H Blijham; J A Knottnerus
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Comparison of risk factors for colon and rectal cancer.

Authors:  Esther K Wei; Edward Giovannucci; Kana Wu; Bernard Rosner; Charles S Fuchs; Walter C Willett; Graham A Colditz
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2004-01-20       Impact factor: 7.396

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of clinical features of suspected colorectal cancer in primary care.

Authors:  M Elisabeth Del Giudice; Emily T Vella; Amanda Hey; Marko Simunovic; William Harris; Cheryl Levitt
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 2.  Positive predictive values of ≥5% in primary care for cancer: systematic review.

Authors:  Mark Shapley; Gemma Mansell; Joanne L Jordan; Kelvin P Jordan
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Risk of uterine cancer in symptomatic women in primary care: case-control study using electronic records.

Authors:  Sarah Walker; Chris Hyde; William Hamilton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Explaining variation in referral from primary to secondary care: cohort study.

Authors:  Dulcie McBride; Sarah Hardoon; Kate Walters; Stuart Gilmour; Rosalind Raine
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-11-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.