Literature DB >> 19455442

Diagnostic delay experienced among gynecological cancer patients: a nationwide survey in Denmark.

Kirstine M Robinson1, Bent Ottesen, Karl Bang Christensen, Allan Krasnik.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine diagnostic delay among gynecological cancer patients.
DESIGN: Nationwide study.
SETTING: The cohort comprised all women receiving their first treatment for cervical, endometrial, or ovarian cancer between 1 October 2006 and 1 December 2007 in four of the five centers for gynecological cancer surgery in Denmark. SAMPLE: Of the 911 women alive, 648 participated, resulting in a response rate of 71.1%; of these, 30.1% were diagnosed with cervical cancer, 31.0% with endometrial cancer, and 38.9% with ovarian cancer.
METHODS: Questionnaire survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Diagnostic delay calculated as total delay, patient delay, general practitioner referral delay, gynecologist appointment delay, and secondary care delay.
RESULTS: Diagnostic delays were found in all parts of the diagnostic pathway. Total diagnostic delay has remained long with a median delay of 12 weeks from the time patients experience symptoms until the time they receive treatment; the 10% experiencing the longest delay wait for >41 weeks. For all types of delay, distributions were non-normal. This indicates that the greatest potential for optimizing clinical outcomes may be among the minority of patients experiencing very long delays. Ovarian cancer patients experienced significantly shorter delays compared with other gynecological cancer patients in all parts of the health care system.
CONCLUSIONS: Delays occur in all parts of the diagnostic process, suggesting that a multifaceted approach should be adopted with special focus on reducing the very long delays experienced by some patients. By reducing the total diagnostic delays, outcomes such as three-year survival rates can potentially be improved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19455442     DOI: 10.1080/00016340902971482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  5 in total

1.  Diagnostic delay, quality of life and patient satisfaction among women diagnosed with endometrial or ovarian cancer: a nationwide Danish study.

Authors:  Kirstine M Robinson; Karl Bang Christensen; Bent Ottesen; Allan Krasnik
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-12-04       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Risk of uterine cancer in symptomatic women in primary care: case-control study using electronic records.

Authors:  Sarah Walker; Chris Hyde; William Hamilton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Delays in treating endometrial cancer in the South West of England.

Authors:  N Johnson; T Miles; D Bailey; K Tylko-Hill; N Das; G Ahson; K Waring; N Acheson; M Voss; J Gordon; S Keates-Porter; G Hughes; S Golby; E Fort; L Newton; V Nallaswamy; J Murdoch; R Anderson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  Health education interventions to promote early presentation and referral for women with symptoms of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Chalong Cheewakriangkrai; Chumnan Kietpeerakool; Kittipat Charoenkwan; Porjai Pattanittum; Denny John; Apiwat Aue-Aungkul; Pisake Lumbiganon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-03-13

5.  Patient and primary care delays in the diagnostic pathway of gynaecological cancers: a systematic review of influencing factors.

Authors:  Pauline Williams; Peter Murchie; Christine Bond
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 5.386

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.