OBJECTIVE: To assess feasibility and image quality (IQ) of a new post-processing algorithm for retrospective extraction of an optimised multi-phase CT (time-resolved CT) of the liver from volumetric perfusion imaging. METHODS: Sixteen patients underwent clinically indicated perfusion CT using 4D spiral mode of dual-source 128-slice CT. Three image sets were reconstructed: motion-corrected and noise-reduced (MCNR) images derived from 4D raw data; maximum and average intensity projections (time MIP/AVG) of the arterial/portal/portal-venous phases and all phases (total MIP/ AVG) derived from retrospective fusion of dedicated MCNR split series. Two readers assessed the IQ, detection rate and evaluation time; one reader assessed image noise and lesion-to-liver contrast. RESULTS: Time-resolved CT was feasible in all patients. Each post-processing step yielded a significant reduction of image noise and evaluation time, maintaining lesion-to-liver contrast. Time MIPs/AVGs showed the highest overall IQ without relevant motion artefacts and best depiction of arterial and portal/portal-venous phases respectively. Time MIPs demonstrated a significantly higher detection rate for arterialised liver lesions than total MIPs/AVGs and the raw data series. CONCLUSION: Time-resolved CT allows data from volumetric perfusion imaging to be condensed into an optimised multi-phase liver CT, yielding a superior IQ and higher detection rate for arterialised liver lesions than the raw data series. KEY POINTS: • Four-dimensional computed tomography is limited by motion artefacts and poor image quality. • Time-resolved-CT facilitates 4D-CT data visualisation, segmentation and analysis by condensing raw data. • Time-resolved CT demonstrates better image quality than raw data images. • Time-resolved CT improves detection of arterialised liver lesions in cirrhotic patients.
OBJECTIVE: To assess feasibility and image quality (IQ) of a new post-processing algorithm for retrospective extraction of an optimised multi-phase CT (time-resolved CT) of the liver from volumetric perfusion imaging. METHODS: Sixteen patients underwent clinically indicated perfusion CT using 4D spiral mode of dual-source 128-slice CT. Three image sets were reconstructed: motion-corrected and noise-reduced (MCNR) images derived from 4D raw data; maximum and average intensity projections (time MIP/AVG) of the arterial/portal/portal-venous phases and all phases (total MIP/ AVG) derived from retrospective fusion of dedicated MCNR split series. Two readers assessed the IQ, detection rate and evaluation time; one reader assessed image noise and lesion-to-liver contrast. RESULTS: Time-resolved CT was feasible in all patients. Each post-processing step yielded a significant reduction of image noise and evaluation time, maintaining lesion-to-liver contrast. Time MIPs/AVGs showed the highest overall IQ without relevant motion artefacts and best depiction of arterial and portal/portal-venous phases respectively. Time MIPs demonstrated a significantly higher detection rate for arterialised liver lesions than total MIPs/AVGs and the raw data series. CONCLUSION: Time-resolved CT allows data from volumetric perfusion imaging to be condensed into an optimised multi-phase liver CT, yielding a superior IQ and higher detection rate for arterialised liver lesions than the raw data series. KEY POINTS: • Four-dimensional computed tomography is limited by motion artefacts and poor image quality. • Time-resolved-CT facilitates 4D-CT data visualisation, segmentation and analysis by condensing raw data. • Time-resolved CT demonstrates better image quality than raw data images. • Time-resolved CT improves detection of arterialised liver lesions in cirrhotic patients.
Authors: Harald Seifarth; Rainer Raupach; Stefan Schaller; Eva Maria Fallenberg; Thomas Flohr; Walter Heindel; Roman Fischbach; David Maintz Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2005-02-12 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: John A Bauhs; Thomas J Vrieze; Andrew N Primak; Michael R Bruesewitz; Cynthia H McCollough Journal: Radiographics Date: 2008 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Vicky Goh; Steve Halligan; Frances Daley; David M Wellsted; Thomas Guenther; Clive I Bartram Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-09-23 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Martijn R Meijerink; Jan Hein T M van Waesberghe; Lineke van der Weide; Petrousjka van den Tol; Sybren Meijer; Cornelis van Kuijk Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2008-05-20 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: He Wang; Sunil Krishnan; Xiaochun Wang; A Sam Beddar; Tina M Briere; Christopher H Crane; Radhe Mohan; Lei Dong Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2008-09-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Peter W A Willems; Patamintita Taeshineetanakul; Barry Schenk; Patrick A Brouwer; Karel G Terbrugge; Timo Krings Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2011-04-05 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Michael A Fischer; Katharina Brehmer; Anders Svensson; Peter Aspelin; Torkel B Brismar Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-02-25 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Michael A Fischer; Herman P Marquez; Sonja Gordic; Bertil Leidner; Ernst Klotz; Peter Aspelin; Hatem Alkadhi; Torkel B Brismar Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-07-01 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Mischa Woisetschläger; Lilian Henriksson; Wolf Bartholomae; Thomas Gasslander; Bergthor Björnsson; Per Sandström Journal: Eur J Radiol Open Date: 2020-07-03