BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The criterion standard to diagnose and classify cranial DAVFs is DSA. Since this is invasive, relatively expensive and time-consuming, a noninvasive alternative is of interest. We aimed to evaluate the capabilities and pitfalls of 4D-CTA in a consecutive series of patients who presented with a newly diagnosed cranial DAVF, as demonstrated by conventional DSA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven patients were included in this study after biplane DSA demonstrated a cranial DAVF. They subsequently underwent 4D-CTA imaging by using a 320-detector CT scanner. DSA and 4D-CTA studies were independently read by 2 blinded observers, by using a standardized scoring sheet. 4D-CTA results were analyzed with DSA as the criterion standard. RESULTS: In 10 cases, there was full agreement between DSA and 4D-CTA regarding the Borden classification. However, in the remaining patient, a slow-filling DAVF with a low shunt volume was missed by both readers on 4D-CTA. In all 10 detected cases, ≥ 1 of the major contributing arteries could be identified with 4D-CTA. Although, by using DSA, the 2 observers identified additional arterial feeders in 7 and 8 cases, respectively, these discrepancies did not influence clinical decision making. CONCLUSIONS: Although novel 4D-CTA imaging may not rule out a small slow-flow DAVF, it appears to be a valuable new adjunct in the noninvasive diagnostic work-up, treatment planning, and follow-up of patients with cranial DAVFs.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The criterion standard to diagnose and classify cranial DAVFs is DSA. Since this is invasive, relatively expensive and time-consuming, a noninvasive alternative is of interest. We aimed to evaluate the capabilities and pitfalls of 4D-CTA in a consecutive series of patients who presented with a newly diagnosed cranial DAVF, as demonstrated by conventional DSA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven patients were included in this study after biplane DSA demonstrated a cranial DAVF. They subsequently underwent 4D-CTA imaging by using a 320-detector CT scanner. DSA and 4D-CTA studies were independently read by 2 blinded observers, by using a standardized scoring sheet. 4D-CTA results were analyzed with DSA as the criterion standard. RESULTS: In 10 cases, there was full agreement between DSA and 4D-CTA regarding the Borden classification. However, in the remaining patient, a slow-filling DAVF with a low shunt volume was missed by both readers on 4D-CTA. In all 10 detected cases, ≥ 1 of the major contributing arteries could be identified with 4D-CTA. Although, by using DSA, the 2 observers identified additional arterial feeders in 7 and 8 cases, respectively, these discrepancies did not influence clinical decision making. CONCLUSIONS: Although novel 4D-CTA imaging may not rule out a small slow-flow DAVF, it appears to be a valuable new adjunct in the noninvasive diagnostic work-up, treatment planning, and follow-up of patients with cranial DAVFs.
Authors: Eric J Salomon; Joe Barfett; Peter W A Willems; Sasikhan Geibprasert; Susanna Bacigaluppi; Timo Krings Journal: Klin Neuroradiol Date: 2009-08-23
Authors: P A Brouwer; T Bosman; M A A van Walderveen; T Krings; A A Leroux; P W A Willems Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2009-10-29 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Timothy J Kaufmann; John Huston; Jay N Mandrekar; Cathy D Schleck; Kent R Thielen; David F Kallmes Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Robert A Willinsky; Steve M Taylor; Karel TerBrugge; Richard I Farb; George Tomlinson; Walter Montanera Journal: Radiology Date: 2003-03-13 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: S Lang; P Gölitz; T Struffert; J Rösch; K Rössler; M Kowarschik; C Strother; A Doerfler Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2017-04-13 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Michael A Fischer; Bertil Leidner; Nikolaos Kartalis; Anders Svensson; Peter Aspelin; Nils Albiin; Torkel B Brismar Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2013-08-31 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Andrea Bink; Joachim Berkefeld; Marlies Wagner; Se-Jong You; Hanns Ackermann; Matthias W Lorenz; Christian Senft; Richard du Mesnil de Rochemont Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2011-09-21 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: T C H Hoogenboom; R M J van Beurden; B van Teylingen; B Schenk; P W A Willems Journal: Interv Neuroradiol Date: 2012-12-03 Impact factor: 1.610