AIM: To prospectively assess the changes in parameters of computed tomography (CT) perfusion pre- and post-transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in different treatment response groups, and to correlate the changes with various responses of HCC to TACE. METHODS: Thirty-nine HCC patients underwent CT perfusion examinations pre-(1 d before TACE) and post-treatment (4 wk after TACE). The response evaluation criteria for solid tumors (RECIST) were referred to when treatment responses were distributed. Wilcoxon-signed ranks test was used to compare the differences in CT perfusion parameters pre- and post-TACE for different response groups. RESULTS: Only one case had treatment response to CR and the CT perfusion maps of post-treatment lesion displayed complete absence of signals. In the PR treatment response group, hepatic artery perfusion (HAP), hepatic arterial fracture (HAF) and hepatic blood volume (HBV) of viable tumors post-TACE were reduced compared with pre-TACE (P = 0.001, 0.030 and 0.001, respectively). In the SD group, all CT perfusion parameters were not significantly different pre- and post-TACE. In the PD group, HAP, HAF, portal vein perfusion (PVP) and hepatic blood flow (HBF) of viable tumors post-TACE were significantly increased compared with pre-TACE (P = 0.005, 0.012, 0.035 and 0.005, respectively). CONCLUSION: Changes in CT perfusion parameters of viable tumors are correlated with different responses of HCC to TACE. Therefore, CT perfusion imaging is a feasible technique for monitoring response of HCC to TACE.
AIM: To prospectively assess the changes in parameters of computed tomography (CT) perfusion pre- and post-transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in different treatment response groups, and to correlate the changes with various responses of HCC to TACE. METHODS: Thirty-nine HCC patients underwent CT perfusion examinations pre-(1 d before TACE) and post-treatment (4 wk after TACE). The response evaluation criteria for solid tumors (RECIST) were referred to when treatment responses were distributed. Wilcoxon-signed ranks test was used to compare the differences in CT perfusion parameters pre- and post-TACE for different response groups. RESULTS: Only one case had treatment response to CR and the CT perfusion maps of post-treatment lesion displayed complete absence of signals. In the PR treatment response group, hepatic artery perfusion (HAP), hepatic arterial fracture (HAF) and hepatic blood volume (HBV) of viable tumors post-TACE were reduced compared with pre-TACE (P = 0.001, 0.030 and 0.001, respectively). In the SD group, all CT perfusion parameters were not significantly different pre- and post-TACE. In the PD group, HAP, HAF, portal vein perfusion (PVP) and hepatic blood flow (HBF) of viable tumors post-TACE were significantly increased compared with pre-TACE (P = 0.005, 0.012, 0.035 and 0.005, respectively). CONCLUSION: Changes in CT perfusion parameters of viable tumors are correlated with different responses of HCC to TACE. Therefore, CT perfusion imaging is a feasible technique for monitoring response of HCC to TACE.
Authors: T Okusaka; S Okada; H Ueno; M Ikeda; M Yoshimori; K Shimada; J Yamamoto; T Kosuge; S Yamasaki; R Iwata; H Furukawa; N Moriyama; M Sakamoto; S Hirohashi Journal: Oncology Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 2.935
Authors: E Y Tsui; J H Chan; Y K Cheung; C C Cheung; W C Tsui; M L Szeto; K W Lau; M K Yuen; S H Luk Journal: Clin Imaging Date: 2000 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.605
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Laure S Fournier; Charles Andre Cuenod; Cedric de Bazelaire; Nathalie Siauve; Christophe Rosty; Phuong Lan Tran; Guy Frija; Olivier Clement Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2004-07-29 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: P Rossi; F M Salvatori; M D'Erme; A Maradei; M Rossi; P Santoro; M Mastantuono; G Gualdi Journal: Radiol Med Date: 1989 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: H Yoshioka; K Nakagawa; H Shindou; Y Ono; A Kawakami; N Mabuchi; S Arita; K Fujii; T Hamada; O Ishida Journal: Acta Radiol Date: 1990-01 Impact factor: 1.990
Authors: Michael A Fischer; Bertil Leidner; Nikolaos Kartalis; Anders Svensson; Peter Aspelin; Nils Albiin; Torkel B Brismar Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2013-08-31 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Dingxin Wang; Brian Jin; Robert J Lewandowski; Robert K Ryu; Kent T Sato; Mary F Mulcahy; Laura M Kulik; Frank H Miller; Riad Salem; Debiao Li; Reed A Omary; Andrew C Larson Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Miroslav Jiřík; Zbyněk Tonar; Anna Králíčková; Lada Eberlová; Hynek Mírka; Petra Kochová; Tomáš Gregor; Petr Hošek; Miroslava Svobodová; Eduard Rohan; Milena Králíčková; Václav Liška Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2016-03-23 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Mary K Bryant; David P Dorn; Jessica Zarzour; J Kevin Smith; David T Redden; Souheil Saddekni; Ahmed Kamel Abdel Aal; Stephen H Gray; Devin E Eckhoff; Derek A Dubay Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2013-08-26 Impact factor: 3.647