OBJECTIVE: We introduce The Psychological Adaptation Scale (PAS) for assessing adaptation to a chronic condition or risk and present validity data from six studies of genetic conditions. METHODS: Informed by theory, we identified four domains of adaptation: effective coping, self-esteem, social integration, and spiritual/existential meaning. Items were selected from the PROMIS "positive illness impact" item bank and adapted from the Rosenberg self-esteem scale to create a 20-item scale. Each domain included five items, with four sub-scale scores. Data from studies of six populations: adults affected with or at risk for genetic conditions (N=3) and caregivers of children with genetic conditions (N=3) were analyzed using confirmatory factor analyses (CFA). RESULTS: CFA suggested that all but five posited items converge on the domains as designed. Invariance of the PAS amongst the studies further suggested it is a valid and reliable tool to facilitate comparisons of adaptation across conditions. CONCLUSION: Use of the PAS will standardize assessments of adaptation and foster understanding of the relationships among related health outcomes, such as quality of life and psychological well-being. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Clinical interventions can be designed based on PAS data to enhance dimensions of psychological adaptation to a chronic health condition or risk. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
OBJECTIVE: We introduce The Psychological Adaptation Scale (PAS) for assessing adaptation to a chronic condition or risk and present validity data from six studies of genetic conditions. METHODS: Informed by theory, we identified four domains of adaptation: effective coping, self-esteem, social integration, and spiritual/existential meaning. Items were selected from the PROMIS "positive illness impact" item bank and adapted from the Rosenberg self-esteem scale to create a 20-item scale. Each domain included five items, with four sub-scale scores. Data from studies of six populations: adults affected with or at risk for genetic conditions (N=3) and caregivers of children with genetic conditions (N=3) were analyzed using confirmatory factor analyses (CFA). RESULTS:CFA suggested that all but five posited items converge on the domains as designed. Invariance of the PAS amongst the studies further suggested it is a valid and reliable tool to facilitate comparisons of adaptation across conditions. CONCLUSION: Use of the PAS will standardize assessments of adaptation and foster understanding of the relationships among related health outcomes, such as quality of life and psychological well-being. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Clinical interventions can be designed based on PAS data to enhance dimensions of psychological adaptation to a chronic health condition or risk. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
Entities:
Keywords:
Adaptation; Health threat of chronic condition or risk; Outcomes of coping; The Psychological Adaptation Scale
Authors: C R Snyder; C Harris; J R Anderson; S A Holleran; L M Irving; S T Sigmon; L Yoshinobu; J Gibb; C Langelle; P Harney Journal: J Pers Soc Psychol Date: 1991-04
Authors: Robert Resta; Barbara Bowles Biesecker; Robin L Bennett; Sandra Blum; Susan Estabrooks Hahn; Michelle N Strecker; Janet L Williams Journal: J Genet Couns Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 2.537
Authors: Katherine Payne; Stuart Nicholls; Marion McAllister; Rhona Macleod; Dian Donnai; Linda M Davies Journal: Value Health Date: 2008 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.725
Authors: Margaret A Chesney; Donald B Chambers; Jonelle M Taylor; Lisa M Johnson; Susan Folkman Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2003 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Rachel Shapira; Erin Turbitt; Lori H Erby; Barbara B Biesecker; William M P Klein; Gillian W Hooker Journal: Fam Cancer Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Justin M Yopp; Allison M Deal; Zev M Nakamura; Eliza M Park; Teresa Edwards; Doug R Wilson; Barbara Biesecker; Donald L Rosenstein Journal: J Fam Psychol Date: 2019-04-25
Authors: Eliza M Park; Allison M Deal; Justin M Yopp; Teresa P Edwards; Douglas J Wilson; Laura C Hanson; Donald L Rosenstein Journal: BMJ Support Palliat Care Date: 2015-12-18 Impact factor: 3.568