Literature DB >> 1579648

Psychometric assessment of the Quality of Life Index.

C E Ferrans1, M J Powers.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Quality of Life Index (QLI) (Ferrans & Powers, 1985a). The sample consisted of 349 patients selected randomly from the adult, in-unit hemodialysis patient population of Illinois. Factor analysis was used to examine the underlying factor structure. A four-factors solution best fit the data, indicating that there were four dimensions underlying the QLI: health and functioning, socioeconomic, psychological/spiritual, and family. Factor analysis of the four primary factors revealed one higher order factor, representing quality of life. Construct validity also was supported by the contrasted groups approach. As predicted, it was found that those who had higher incomes had significantly higher quality of life scores on the social and economic subscale. Support for convergent validity was provided by a strong correlation (r = .77) between scores from the QLI and an assessment of life satisfaction. Findings supported the internal consistency reliability of the entire QLI (alpha = .93) and the four subscales (alphas = .87, .82, .90, .77).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1579648     DOI: 10.1002/nur.4770150106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Nurs Health        ISSN: 0160-6891            Impact factor:   2.228


  120 in total

1.  Psychometric assessment of the Life Satisfaction Questionnaire (LSQ) and a comparison of a randomised sample of Swedish women and those suffering from breast cancer.

Authors:  M Carlsson; E Hamrin; R Lindqvist
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Distinguishing between quality of life and health status in quality of life research: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  K W Smith; N E Avis; S F Assmann
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  A review of the health-related quality of life literature in bipolar disorder.

Authors:  M A Namjoshi; D P Buesching
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Can we identify the poorest quality of life? Assessing the importance of quality of life using the WHOQOL-100.

Authors:  Suzanne M Skevington; Kathryn A O'Connell
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Quality of life among Iranian refugees resettled in Sweden.

Authors:  Mehdi Ghazinour; Jörg Richter; Martin Eisemann
Journal:  J Immigr Health       Date:  2004-04

Review 6.  Quality of life in rare genetic conditions: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Julie S Cohen; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.802

7.  Improving patient-centered medical-surgical nursing practice with quality-of-life assessment.

Authors:  Angela Starkweather
Journal:  Medsurg Nurs       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug

8.  Quality of life among Turkish immigrants in Sweden.

Authors:  Nuran Bayram; Daniel Thorburn; Haydar Demirhan; Nazan Bilgel
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 9.  Identifying and classifying quality-of-life tools for assessing pressure ulcers after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Sander L Hitzig; Christina Balioussis; Ethne Nussbaum; Colleen F McGillivray; B Catharine Craven; Luc Noreau
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 1.985

10.  Identifying and classifying quality of life tools for assessing spasticity after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Christina Balioussis; Sander L Hitzig; Heather Flett; Luc Noreau; B Catharine Craven
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2014
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.