Literature DB >> 27891554

Teaching Genetic Counseling Skills: Incorporating a Genetic Counseling Adaptation Continuum Model to Address Psychosocial Complexity.

Andrea Shugar1,2.   

Abstract

Genetic counselors are trained health care professionals who effectively integrate both psychosocial counseling and information-giving into their practice. Preparing genetic counseling students for clinical practice is a challenging task, particularly when helping them develop effective and active counseling skills. Resistance to incorporating these skills may stem from decreased confidence, fear of causing harm or a lack of clarity of psycho-social goals. The author reflects on the personal challenges experienced in teaching genetic counselling students to work with psychological and social complexity, and proposes a Genetic Counseling Adaptation Continuum model and methodology to guide students in the use of advanced counseling skills.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptation; Counseling; Education; Genetic counseling; Medical genetics; Psychosocial; Psychotherapy; Reciprocal engagement model; Teaching

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27891554     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-016-0042-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  14 in total

1.  Psychosocial genetic counseling in the post-nondirective era: a point of view.

Authors:  Jon Weil
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  A new definition of Genetic Counseling: National Society of Genetic Counselors' Task Force report.

Authors:  Robert Resta; Barbara Bowles Biesecker; Robin L Bennett; Sandra Blum; Susan Estabrooks Hahn; Michelle N Strecker; Janet L Williams
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 3.  Defining and redefining the scope and goals of genetic counseling.

Authors:  Robert G Resta
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 3.908

4.  Coming full circle: a reciprocal-engagement model of genetic counseling practice.

Authors:  Patricia McCarthy Veach; Dianne M Bartels; Bonnie S Leroy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Genetic counselor perceptions of genetic counseling session goals: a validation study of the reciprocal-engagement model.

Authors:  Julianne E Hartmann; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Ian M MacFarlane; Bonnie S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 6.  Assessment of the content and process of genetic counseling: a critical review of empirical studies.

Authors:  Bettina Meiser; Jennifer Irle; Elizabeth Lobb; Kristine Barlow-Stewart
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-09-13       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Teachers as learners: the effect of bedside teaching on the clinical skills of clinician-teachers.

Authors:  Marjorie D Wenrich; Molly B Jackson; Kamal S Ajam; Ineke H Wolfhagen; Paul G Ramsey; Albert J Scherpbier
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 8.  Analyzing communication in genetic consultations--a systematic review.

Authors:  Jean Paul; Sylvia Metcalfe; Lesley Stirling; Brenda Wilson; Jan Hodgson
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2014-09-30

9.  Conceptualizing genetic counseling as psychotherapy in the era of genomic medicine.

Authors:  Jehannine Austin; Alicia Semaka; George Hadjipavlou
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Primary care for patient complexity, not only disease.

Authors:  C J Peek; Macaran A Baird; Eli Coleman
Journal:  Fam Syst Health       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.950

View more
  3 in total

1.  Special Issue Introduction: Dealing with Psychological and Social Complexity in Genetic Counseling.

Authors:  Luba Djurdjinovic; June A Peters
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  A Person-Centered Approach to Cardiovascular Genetic Testing.

Authors:  Julia Platt
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 5.159

Review 3.  Population genomic screening: Ethical considerations to guide age at implementation.

Authors:  Scott J Spencer; Stephanie M Fullerton
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 4.772

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.