Literature DB >> 23991278

Full-arch maxillary rehabilitation fixed on 6 implants.

M Gargari1, V Prete, A Pujia, F M Ceruso.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to report a case of full-arch rehabilitation on six endosseous implants loaded following the standard procedure.
METHODS: An implant-prosthetic treatment was proposed to a 53-year-old woman with a total prosthesis in the upper jaw. Six implants on upper maxillary were placed keeping the upper complete denture during the osseointegration period. The implants were left submerged to allow the patient to wear removable prostheses and the prosthesis was rebase with Hydrocast to not compress the sites of healing during the osseointegration period. The impression of implants was made with silicones for addition (VPS) with different viscosities after 8 weeks. The final restoration was carried out taking into account the aesthetic and functional canons.
CONCLUSIONS: Correct diagnosis and accurate implant planning are key for success in implant rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  VDO; full-arch rehabilitation; implant supported prosthesis

Year:  2013        PMID: 23991278      PMCID: PMC3755809     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)        ISSN: 1974-5648


  15 in total

1.  A clinical evaluation of 76 implant-supported superstructures in the composite grafted maxilla.

Authors:  M L Kaptein; C De Putter; G L De Lange; P A Blijdorp
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.837

2.  Vertical dimension of occlusion in implant dentistry: significance and approach.

Authors:  Glenn L Gittelson
Journal:  Implant Dent       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.454

3.  Three-year data from a randomizd, controlled study of early loading of single-stage dental implants supporting maxillary full-arch prostheses.

Authors:  Kerstin Fischer; Torsten Stenberg
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Prosthodontic essentials and an evaluation of the mandibular subperiosteal implant denture.

Authors:  R L BODINE
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1955-12       Impact factor: 3.634

5.  The use of precision attachments in a lower full arch rehabilitation with osseointegrated implants--a clinical report.

Authors:  H el-Charkawi
Journal:  Egypt Dent J       Date:  1994-10

6.  Long-term performance of Osseotite implants: a 6-year clinical follow-up.

Authors:  D Y Sullivan; R L Sherwood; S S Porter
Journal:  Compend Contin Educ Dent       Date:  2001-04

7.  A prospective 15-year follow-up study of mandibular fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants. Clinical results and marginal bone loss.

Authors:  L W Lindquist; G E Carlsson; T Jemt
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.977

8.  A long-term follow-up study of non-submerged ITI implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Part I: Ten-year life table analysis of a prospective multicenter study with 1286 implants.

Authors:  Nicola Ferrigno; Mauro Laureti; Stefano Fanali; Guido Grippaudo
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.977

9.  Zirconia: cementation of prosthetic restorations. Literature review.

Authors:  M Gargari; F Gloria; E Napoli; A M Pujia
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2011-01-23

Review 10.  The accuracy of implant impressions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Heeje Lee; Joseph S So; J L Hochstedler; Carlo Ercoli
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.426

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Bone level changes around platform switching and platform matching implants: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  M DI Girolamo; R Calcaterra; R DI Gianfilippo; C Arcuri; L Baggi
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2016-11-13

2.  Full digital workflow for implant-prosthetic rehabilitations: a case report.

Authors:  L Arcuri; C Lorenzi; F Cecchetti; F Germano; M Spuntarelli; A Barlattani
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2016-07-23

3.  The influence of micro and macro-geometry in term of bone-implant interface in two implant systems: an histomorphometrical study.

Authors:  A Rocci; R Calcaterra; M DI Girolamo; M Rocci; C Rocci; L Baggi
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2016-07-23

4.  A novel workflow for computer guided implant surgery matching digital dental casts and CBCT scan.

Authors:  G DE Vico; F Ferraris; L Arcuri; F Guzzo; D Spinelli
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2016-11-13

5.  In vitro evaluation of prosthodontic impression on natural dentition: a comparison between traditional and digital techniques.

Authors:  G Malaguti; R Rossi; B Marziali; A Esposito; G Bruno; C Dariol; A DI Fiore
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2017-02-14

Review 6.  Metals used in maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  L Pacifici; F DE Angelis; A Orefici; A Cielo
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2017-02-14

7.  Biomechanical behaviour of a jawbone loaded with a prosthetic system supported by monophasic and biphasic implants.

Authors:  F Inchingolo; L Paracchini; F DE Angelis; A Cielo; A Orefici; D Spitaleri; L Santacroce; E Gheno; A Palermo
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2017-02-14

8.  Different performance of platform switching in equicrestal position implant: an histological study.

Authors:  A Rocci; R Calcaterra; M Rocci; C Rocci; M DI Girolamo; L Baggi
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2016-11-13

9.  Preservation of extraction socket in immediate implant placement: a clinical study.

Authors:  M DI Girolamo; C A Arullani; R Calcaterra; J Manzi; C Arcuri; L Baggi
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2016-11-16

10.  Clinical and radiographic evaluation of single tantalum dental implants: a prospective pilot clinical study.

Authors:  M DE Francesco; E A Gobbato; D Noce; F Cavallari; A Fioretti
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2017-02-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.