Literature DB >> 17976895

Time course of visual perception: coarse-to-fine processing and beyond.

Jay Hegdé1.   

Abstract

Our perception of a visual scene changes rapidly in time, even when the scene itself does not. It is increasingly clear that understanding how the visual percept changes in time is crucial to understanding how we see. We are still far from fully understanding the temporal changes in the visual percept and the neural mechanisms that underlie it. But recently, many disparate lines of evidence are beginning to converge to produce a complex but fuzzy picture of visual temporal dynamics. It is clear, largely from psychophysical studies in humans, that one can get the 'gist' of complex visual scenes within about 150ms after the stimulus onset, even when the stimulus itself is presented as briefly as 10 ms or so. It generally takes longer processing, if not longer stimulus presentation, to identify individual objects. It may take even longer for a fuller semantic understanding, or awareness, of the scene to emerge and be encoded in short-term memory. Microelectrode recording studies in monkeys, along with neuroimaging studies mostly in humans, have elucidated many important temporal dynamic phenomena at the level of individual neurons and neuronal populations. Many of the temporal changes at the perceptual and the neural levels can be captured by the multifaceted and somewhat ambiguous concept of coarse-to-fine processing, although it is clear that not all temporal changes can be characterized this way. A more comprehensive, albeit unproven, alternative framework for understanding visual temporal dynamics is to view it as a sequential, Bayesian decision-making process. At each step, the visual system infers the likely nature visual scene by jointly evaluating the available processed image information and prior knowledge about the scene, including prior inferences. Whether the processing proceeds in a coarse-to-fine fashion depends largely on whether the underlying computations are hierarchical or not. Characterizing these inferential steps from the computational, perceptual and neural standpoints will be a key part of future work in this emerging field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17976895     DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2007.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Neurobiol        ISSN: 0301-0082            Impact factor:   11.685


  72 in total

1.  Curvature processing dynamics in macaque area V4.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Yau; Anitha Pasupathy; Scott L Brincat; Charles E Connor
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Neural microgenesis of personally familiar face recognition.

Authors:  Meike Ramon; Luca Vizioli; Joan Liu-Shuang; Bruno Rossion
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Reverse hierarchies and sensory learning.

Authors:  Merav Ahissar; Mor Nahum; Israel Nelken; Shaul Hochstein
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Visual discrimination predicts naming and semantic association accuracy in Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  Stacy M Harnish; Jean Neils-Strunjas; James Eliassen; Jamie Reilly; Marcus Meinzer; John Greer Clark; Jane Joseph
Journal:  Cogn Behav Neurol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.600

5.  Influence of time-of-day on joint Navon effect.

Authors:  Marco Fabbri; Matteo Frisoni; Monica Martoni; Lorenzo Tonetti; Vincenzo Natale
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2017-11-28

6.  Temporal processing characteristics of the Ponzo illusion.

Authors:  Filipp Schmidt; Anke Haberkamp
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-03-13

7.  Neural Coding for Shape and Texture in Macaque Area V4.

Authors:  Taekjun Kim; Wyeth Bair; Anitha Pasupathy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Recognition memory for low- and high-frequency-filtered emotional faces: Low spatial frequencies drive emotional memory enhancement, whereas high spatial frequencies drive the emotion-induced recognition bias.

Authors:  Michaela Rohr; Johannes Tröger; Nils Michely; Alarith Uhde; Dirk Wentura
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-07

9.  Consequences of the Oculomotor Cycle for the Dynamics of Perception.

Authors:  Marco Boi; Martina Poletti; Jonathan D Victor; Michele Rucci
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  The timing of emotional discrimination in human amygdala and ventral visual cortex.

Authors:  Dean Sabatinelli; Peter J Lang; Margaret M Bradley; Vincent D Costa; Andreas Keil
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.