Literature DB >> 15351629

On the role of response conflicts and stimulus position for hemispheric differences in global/local processing: an ERP study.

Gregor Volberg1, Ronald Hübner.   

Abstract

It is widely assumed that the local and global levels of hierarchical stimuli are processed more efficiently in the left and right cerebral hemispheres, respectively. However, corresponding effects were not observed under all circumstances. In ERP studies, they occurred more often with centrally presented stimuli than with laterally presented ones, whereas reaction-time studies revealed that a response conflict between the levels is relevant. The present study examines which of these two factors is more important by presenting conflicting and non-conflicting stimuli to the left or right visual field and recording ERPs as well as collecting behavioral data. If a central stimulus position is crucial, then no effects should show up. Contrary to this prediction, the expected hemispheric differences were observed in the behavioral data as well as in the later occurring (N2 and P3) ERP amplitudes. However, in all variables, the effects were more pronounced for conflicting stimuli. The results suggest that response conflicts are more important for obtaining hemispheric differences in global/local processing than a central stimulus presentation. This is interpreted in the way that hemispheric differences vary with respect to the stimulus representation that is needed to select a proper response. Copyright 2004 Elsevier Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15351629     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.04.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  31 in total

1.  Neural correlates of after-effects caused by adaptation to multiple face displays.

Authors:  Krisztina Nagy; Márta Zimmer; Mark W Greenlee; Gyula Kovács
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Do the hemispheres differ in their preparation for global/local processing?

Authors:  Gregor Volberg; Ronald Hübner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Local and global auditory processing: behavioral and ERP evidence.

Authors:  Lisa D Sanders; David Poeppel
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Spatial asymmetries in viewing and remembering scenes: consequences of an attentional bias?

Authors:  Christopher A Dickinson; Helene Intraub
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  EEG alpha oscillations in the preparation for global and local processing predict behavioral performance.

Authors:  Gregor Volberg; Katrin Kliegl; Simon Hanslmayr; Mark W Greenlee
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  The architecture of cross-hemispheric communication in the aging brain: linking behavior to functional and structural connectivity.

Authors:  Simon W Davis; James E Kragel; David J Madden; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Attentional selection of relative SF mediates global versus local processing: evidence from EEG.

Authors:  Anastasia V Flevaris; Shlomo Bentin; Lynn C Robertson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Hierarchical processing of visual stimuli in nephropathic cystinosis.

Authors:  Aakash Sathappan; Doris Trauner
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 4.982

9.  Cerebral hemodynamics during scene viewing: Hemispheric lateralization predicts temporal gaze behavior associated with distinct modes of visual processing.

Authors:  Mark Mills; Mohammed Alwatban; Benjamin Hage; Erin Barney; Edward J Truemper; Gregory R Bashford; Michael D Dodd
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Callosal degradation in HIV-1 infection predicts hierarchical perception: a DTI study.

Authors:  Eva M Müller-Oehring; Tilman Schulte; Margaret J Rosenbloom; Adolf Pfefferbaum; Edith V Sullivan
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.