Literature DB >> 23985182

Enhancing informed choice to undergo health screening: a systematic review.

Barbara Bowles Biesecker1, Marc D Schwartz, Theresa M Marteau.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of health screening interventions aimed at enhancing informed choice.
METHODS: Studies were selected if (1) they were randomized controlled trials conducted between January 1, 2000, and March 30, 2010, (2) participants in one arm underwent a prescreening intervention aimed at improving informed choice, and (3) informed choice was the primary outcome.
RESULTS: Eight studies that met the inclusion criteria involved screening for prostate, colorectal and breast cancer, and diabetes. Five of the 8 prescreening interventions led to greater informed choice.
CONCLUSIONS: With researchers mindful of the limited number of studies, findings were encouraging, but conclusions regarding the most effective ways of facilitating informed choice for screening are at best tentative.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23985182      PMCID: PMC3761400          DOI: 10.5993/AJHB.37.3.8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Behav        ISSN: 1087-3244


  30 in total

Review 1.  Increasing informed uptake and non-uptake of screening: evidence from a systematic review.

Authors:  R G Jepson; C A Forbes; A J Sowden; R A Lewis
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Educating men about prostate cancer screening. A randomized trial of a mailed pamphlet.

Authors:  T J Wilt; J Paul; M Murdoch; D Nelson; S Nugent; H B Rubins
Journal:  Eff Clin Pract       Date:  2001 May-Jun

3.  Validation of a decisional conflict scale.

Authors:  A M O'Connor
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1995 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Effects of a mammography decision-making intervention at 12 and 24 months.

Authors:  Barbara K Rimer; Susan Halabi; Celette Sugg Skinner; Isaac M Lipkus; Tara S Strigo; Ellen B Kaplan; Gregory P Samsa
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  The effect of a stage-matched and tailored intervention on repeat mammography(1).

Authors:  Melissa A Clark; William Rakowski; Beverly Ehrich; Barbara K Rimer; Wayne F Velicer; Catherine E Dube; Deborah N Pearlman; Kristen K Peterson; Michael Goldstein
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Use of evidence based leaflets to promote informed choice in maternity care: randomised controlled trial in everyday practice.

Authors:  A O'Cathain; S J Walters; J P Nicholl; K J Thomas; M Kirkham
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-16

7.  Randomized trial examining the effect of two prostate cancer screening educational interventions on patient knowledge, preferences, and behaviors.

Authors:  Melissa R Partin; David Nelson; David Radosevich; Sean Nugent; Ann B Flood; Nancy Dillon; Jeremy Holtzman; Michele Haas; Timothy J Wilt
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Pre-counseling education materials for BRCA testing: does tailoring make a difference?

Authors:  Celette Sugg Skinner; Joellen M Schildkraut; Donald Berry; Brian Calingaert; P Kelly Marcom; Jeremy Sugarman; Eric P Winer; J Dirk Iglehart; P Andrew Futreal; Barbara K Rimer
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2002

9.  Does evidence-based information about screening for prostate cancer enhance consumer decision-making? A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M Gattellari; J E Ward
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.136

10.  A randomized controlled trial comparing internet and video to facilitate patient education for men considering the prostate specific antigen test.

Authors:  Dominick L Frosch; Robert M Kaplan; Vincent J Felitti
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  18 in total

1.  "Don't Want No Risk and Don't Want No Problems": Public Understandings of the Risks and Benefits of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing in the United States.

Authors:  Megan Allyse; Lauren Carter Sayres; Taylor Goodspeed; Marsha Michie; Mildred K Cho
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2015

2.  Predictors of risk-reducing surgery intentions following genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Mary Kathleen Ladd; Beth N Peshkin; Leigha Senter; Shari Baldinger; Claudine Isaacs; Hannah Segal; Samantha Philip; Chloe Phillips; Kate Shane; Aimee Martin; Veronique Weinstein; Robert Pilarski; Joanne Jeter; Kevin Sweet; Bonnie Hatten; Elisabeth J Wurtmann; Shanda Phippen; Della Bro; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Tissue vs Liquid Biopsies for Cancer Detection: Ethical Issues.

Authors:  Chiara Mannelli
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 1.352

4.  Beyond the mammography debate: a moderate perspective.

Authors:  C Kaniklidis
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Editorial: Social Inequality in Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Guido Van Hal; Hajo Zeeb; Harry J de Koning
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-04-28

Review 6.  Predispositions to Lymphoma: A Practical Review for Genetic Counselors.

Authors:  Morgan Similuk; V Koneti Rao; Jane Churpek; Michael Lenardo
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Effect of providing risk information on undergoing cervical cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Fujiwara; Akihiro Shimoda; Yoshiki Ishikawa; Akiyo Taneichi; Mai Ohashi; Yoshifumi Takahashi; Takahiro Koyanagi; Hiroyuki Morisawa; Suzuyo Takahashi; Naoto Sato; Shizuo Machida; Yuji Takei; Yasushi Saga; Mitsuaki Suzuki
Journal:  Arch Public Health       Date:  2015-02-23

8.  Health information-seeking behavior of seniors who use the Internet: a survey.

Authors:  Stephanie Medlock; Saeid Eslami; Marjan Askari; Derk L Arts; Danielle Sent; Sophia E de Rooij; Ameen Abu-Hanna
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Response and participation of underserved populations after a three-step invitation strategy for a cardiometabolic health check.

Authors:  Iris Groenenberg; Mathilde R Crone; Sandra van Dijk; Jamila Ben Meftah; Barend J C Middelkoop; Willem J J Assendelft; Anne M Stiggelbout
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Knowledge and Informed Decision-Making about Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Participation in Groups with Low and Adequate Health Literacy.

Authors:  M L Essink-Bot; E Dekker; D R M Timmermans; E Uiters; M P Fransen
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 2.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.