Literature DB >> 11895822

Use of evidence based leaflets to promote informed choice in maternity care: randomised controlled trial in everyday practice.

A O'Cathain1, S J Walters, J P Nicholl, K J Thomas, M Kirkham.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of leaflets on promoting informed choice in women using maternity services.
DESIGN: Cluster trial, with maternity units randomised to use leaflets (intervention units) or offer usual care (control units). Data collected through postal questionnaires.
SETTING: 13 maternity units in Wales. PARTICIPANTS: Four separate samples of women using maternity services. Antenatal samples: women reaching 28 weeks' gestation before (n=1386) and after (n=1778) the intervention. Postnatal samples: women at eight weeks after delivery before (n=1741) and after (n=1547) the intervention. INTERVENTION: Provision of 10 pairs of Informed Choice leaflets for service users and midwives and a training session for staff in their use. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in the proportion of women who reported exercising informed choice. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: changes in women's knowledge; satisfaction with information, choice, and discussion; and possible consequences of informed choice.
RESULTS: There was no change in the proportion of women who reported that they exercised informed choice in the intervention units compared with the control units for either antenatal or postnatal women. There was a small increase in satisfaction with information in the antenatal samples in the intervention units compared with the control units (odds ratio 1.40, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.88). Only three quarters of women in the intervention units reported being given at least one of the leaflets, indicating problems with the implementation of the intervention.
CONCLUSION: In everyday practice, evidence based leaflets were not effective in promoting informed choice in women using maternity services.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11895822      PMCID: PMC84396          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.324.7338.643

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  7 in total

1.  Editorial: special conference issue.

Authors:  Cathy Charles; Amiram Gafni; Tim Whelan
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  The Control Preferences Scale.

Authors:  L F Degner; J A Sloan; P Venkatesh
Journal:  Can J Nurs Res       Date:  1997

3.  Breaking the matches in a paired t-test for community interventions when the number of pairs is small.

Authors:  P Diehr; D C Martin; T Koepsell; A Cheadle
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1995-07-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 4.  Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review.

Authors:  A M O'Connor; A Rostom; V Fiset; J Tetroe; V Entwistle; H Llewellyn-Thomas; M Holmes-Rovner; M Barry; J Jones
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-18

5.  Qualitative study of evidence based leaflets in maternity care.

Authors:  Helen Stapleton; Mavis Kirkham; Gwenan Thomas
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-16

6.  Supporting and resourcing treatment decision-making: some policy considerations.

Authors:  Vikki A. Entwistle
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Implementing shared decision-making in routine practice: barriers and opportunities.

Authors:  Margaret Holmes-Rovner; Diane Valade; Catherine Orlowski; Catherine Draus; Barbara Nabozny-Valerio; Susan Keiser
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.377

  7 in total
  30 in total

1.  Promoting evidence based practice in maternal care.

Authors:  Ana Langer; Jos Villar
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-04-20

2.  Evidence based leaflets in maternity care. Compliance, coercion, and power have huge effect in maternity services.

Authors:  Barbara Vernon; Sally Tracy; Tracy Reibel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-07-06

3.  Philosophy for physicians.

Authors:  C Mark Harper
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 4.  Patients' perceptions of sharing in decisions: a systematic review of interventions to enhance shared decision making in routine clinical practice.

Authors:  France Légaré; Stéphane Turcotte; Dawn Stacey; Stéphane Ratté; Jennifer Kryworuchko; Ian D Graham
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 5.  Patient involvement in patient safety: what factors influence patient participation and engagement?

Authors:  Rachel E Davis; Rosamond Jacklin; Nick Sevdalis; Charles A Vincent
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Informing children and parents about research.

Authors:  A Dawson; S A Spencer
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  Explaining Mendelian inheritance in genetic consultations: an IPR study of counselor and counselee experiences.

Authors:  Theodora Gale; Sara Pasalodos-Sanchez; Lauren Kerzin-Storrar; Georgina Hall; Rhona MacLeod
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Client preferences affect treatment satisfaction, completion, and clinical outcome: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Oliver Lindhiem; Charles B Bennett; Christopher J Trentacosta; Caitlin McLear
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2014-06-16

9.  Assisting informed decision making for labour analgesia: a randomised controlled trial of a decision aid for labour analgesia versus a pamphlet.

Authors:  Camille H Raynes-Greenow; Natasha Nassar; Siranda Torvaldsen; Lyndal Trevena; Christine L Roberts
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Evaluating decision aids--where next?

Authors:  Alicia O'Cathain; Kate J Thomas
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.