Literature DB >> 31729685

Tissue vs Liquid Biopsies for Cancer Detection: Ethical Issues.

Chiara Mannelli1,2,3.   

Abstract

Cancer is the second leading cause of death in developed countries, making it a global public health problem. In this scenario, early detection is the key to successful treatment. Tissue biopsy, the current gold standard for cancer diagnosis, offers reliable results, but it is feasible only when the mass becomes detectable. On the other hand liquid biopsy, a promising experimental system, not yet implemented within clinical practice, allows early detection as its functioning relies on the analysis of body fluids. Yet, its results are less reliable if compared to those of tissue biopsy as, for instance, false positives and false negatives might occur. Despite technical features, the tradeoff between a reliable diagnosis available at a later time and a potentially less reliable diagnosis available at an early stage poses significant ethical challenges in the clinical scenario which involve, among other aspects, informed consent, communication, and patient-physician encounter.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioethics; Informed consent; Liquid Biopsy; Oncology Research

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31729685     DOI: 10.1007/s11673-019-09944-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bioeth Inq        ISSN: 1176-7529            Impact factor:   1.352


  14 in total

Review 1.  Principles of cancer screening: lessons from history and study design issues.

Authors:  Jennifer M Croswell; David F Ransohoff; Barnett S Kramer
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.929

2.  Knowledge, beliefs and barriers associated with prostate cancer prevention and screening behaviors among African-American men.

Authors:  Deborah E Blocker; LaHoma Smith Romocki; Kamilah B Thomas; Belinda L Jones; Ethel Jean Jackson; LaVerne Reid; Marci K Campbell
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 3.  Liquid biopsies: genotyping circulating tumor DNA.

Authors:  Luis A Diaz; Alberto Bardelli
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Quantifying the benefits and harms of screening mammography.

Authors:  H Gilbert Welch; Honor J Passow
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 5.  Overdiagnosis in mammographic screening for breast cancer in Europe: a literature review.

Authors:  Donella Puliti; Stephen W Duffy; Guido Miccinesi; Harry de Koning; Elsebeth Lynge; Marco Zappa; Eugenio Paci
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.136

Review 6.  Cancer genome landscapes.

Authors:  Bert Vogelstein; Nickolas Papadopoulos; Victor E Velculescu; Shibin Zhou; Luis A Diaz; Kenneth W Kinzler
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The effect of physician recommendation on enrollment in the Breast Cancer Chemoprevention Trial.

Authors:  A Y Kinney; C Richards; S W Vernon; V G Vogel
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 8.  Enhancing informed choice to undergo health screening: a systematic review.

Authors:  Barbara Bowles Biesecker; Marc D Schwartz; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2013-05

9.  Use of research biopsies in clinical trials: are risks and benefits adequately discussed?

Authors:  Michael J Overman; Janhavi Modak; Scott Kopetz; Ravi Murthy; James C Yao; Marshall E Hicks; James L Abbruzzese; Alda L Tam
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing.

Authors:  Marco Gerlinger; Andrew J Rowan; Stuart Horswell; James Larkin; David Endesfelder; Eva Gronroos; Pierre Martinez; Nicholas Matthews; Aengus Stewart; Charles Swanton; M Math; Patrick Tarpey; Ignacio Varela; Benjamin Phillimore; Sharmin Begum; Neil Q McDonald; Adam Butler; David Jones; Keiran Raine; Calli Latimer; Claudio R Santos; Mahrokh Nohadani; Aron C Eklund; Bradley Spencer-Dene; Graham Clark; Lisa Pickering; Gordon Stamp; Martin Gore; Zoltan Szallasi; Julian Downward; P Andrew Futreal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  3 in total

1.  Application of an Ultrasensitive NGS-Based Blood Test for the Diagnosis of Early-Stage Lung Cancer: Sensitivity, a Hurdle Still Difficult to Overcome.

Authors:  Malaïka Van der Linden; Bram Van Gaever; Lennart Raman; Karim Vermaelen; Ingel Demedts; Veerle Surmont; Ulrike Himpe; Yolande Lievens; Liesbeth Ferdinande; Franceska Dedeurwaerdere; Joni Van der Meulen; Kathleen Claes; Björn Menten; Jo Van Dorpe
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 2.  Proteomic approaches for characterizing renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  David J Clark; Hui Zhang
Journal:  Clin Proteomics       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 3.988

3.  Nanoribbon Biosensor in the Detection of miRNAs Associated with Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Yuri D Ivanov; Kristina V Goldaeva; Kristina A Malsagova; Tatyana O Pleshakova; Rafael A Galiullin; Vladimir P Popov; Nikolay E Kushlinskii; Alexander A Alferov; Dmitry V Enikeev; Natalia V Potoldykova; Alexander I Archakov
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-18       Impact factor: 2.891

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.