Literature DB >> 23983669

Dose and Time Dependence of Targeted and Untargeted Effects after Very Low Doses of α-Particle Irradiation of Human Lung Cancer Cells.

A Belchior1, O Monteiro Gil, P Almeida, P Vaz.   

Abstract

Understanding the effects to human health resulting from exposure to low doses of ionizing radiation is a persisting challenge. No one questions the deleterious consequences for humans following exposure to high radiation doses; however, in the low dose range, the complex and to some extent unknown cellular responses raise important misgivings about the resulting protective or potentially detrimental effects. Bystander effects are involved in low dose exposures, being characterized by the appearance in unirradiated cells of a cellular damage associated with direct radiation exposure. The purpose of our work was to assess, by using clonogenic and micronuclei assays, the dose and time dependence of the bystander response after cells exposure to very low doses of α-particles and to evaluate its importance in the overall induced damage. The study includes an irradiated cells culture, a medium transfer culture with non-irradiated cells and a culture with irradiated cells after centrifugation. We observed a non-negligible contribution of the bystander effects in the overall cellular damage. Low-dose hyper-sensitivity was observed for medium transfer and irradiated cells after centrifugation cultures. Delayed and earlier cellular damage were similar in almost all experiments, suggesting an effectiveness of irradiated medium to induce a bystander response soon after irradiation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MN assay; bystander effects; early and delayed cellular damage; very low doses

Year:  2012        PMID: 23983669      PMCID: PMC3748853          DOI: 10.2203/dose-response.12-036.Belchior

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dose Response        ISSN: 1559-3258            Impact factor:   2.658


  36 in total

1.  Relationship between radiation-induced low-dose hypersensitivity and the bystander effect.

Authors:  Carmel Mothersill; C B Seymour; M C Joiner
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Are chromosomal instabilities induced by exposure of cultured normal human cells to low- or high-LET radiation?

Authors:  Lawrence C Dugan; Joel S Bedford
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 3.  Mechanisms and implications of genomic instability and other delayed effects of ionizing radiation exposure.

Authors:  C Mothersill; C B Seymour
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.000

4.  Relative contribution of bystander and targeted cell killing to the low-dose region of the radiation dose-response curve.

Authors:  C B Seymour; C Mothersill
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Cell-cell contact during gamma irradiation is not required to induce a bystander effect in normal human keratinocytes: evidence for release during irradiation of a signal controlling survival into the medium.

Authors:  C Mothersill; C B Seymour
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  The effect of diesel exhaust particles on cell function and release of inflammatory mediators from human bronchial epithelial cells in vitro.

Authors:  H Bayram; J L Devalia; R J Sapsford; T Ohtoshi; Y Miyabara; M Sagai; R J Davies
Journal:  Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 6.914

7.  Estimating radiation-induced cancer risks at very low doses: rationale for using a linear no-threshold approach.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Rainer K Sachs
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 1.925

8.  The impact of the bystander effect on the low-dose hypersensitivity phenomenon.

Authors:  Otilia Nuta; Firouz Darroudi
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 1.925

9.  Direct evidence for the participation of gap junction-mediated intercellular communication in the transmission of damage signals from alpha -particle irradiated to nonirradiated cells.

Authors:  E I Azzam; S M de Toledo; J B Little
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  The adaptive response in radiobiology: evolving insights and implications.

Authors:  S Wolff
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  4 in total

1.  Does the number of irradiated cells influence the spatial distribution of bystander effects?

Authors:  A Belchior; I Balásházy; O Monteiro Gil; P Vaz; P Almeida
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  Dose Rate Effects on the Selective Radiosensitization of Prostate Cells by GRPR-Targeted Gold Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Ana Marques; Ana Belchior; Francisco Silva; Fernanda Marques; Maria Paula Cabral Campello; Teresa Pinheiro; Pedro Santos; Luis Santos; António P A Matos; António Paulo
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 3.  Internal microdosimetry of alpha-emitting radionuclides.

Authors:  Werner Hofmann; Wei Bo Li; Werner Friedland; Brian W Miller; Balázs Madas; Manuel Bardiès; Imre Balásházy
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Radiobiological Characterization of 64CuCl₂ as a Simple Tool for Prostate Cancer Theranostics.

Authors:  Joana Fernandes Guerreiro; Vítor Alves; Antero José Abrunhosa; António Paulo; Octávia Monteiro Gil; Filipa Mendes
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-11-11       Impact factor: 4.411

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.