Literature DB >> 10790270

Relative contribution of bystander and targeted cell killing to the low-dose region of the radiation dose-response curve.

C B Seymour1, C Mothersill.   

Abstract

Human keratinocytes show a bystander effect when exposed to low doses of low-LET radiation. In this paper, data are presented showing a method of correcting the overall survival curve to enable analysis of the relative contributions of the bystander effect and the effect attributable to direct interaction of the radiation with the target cell. The technique used is to obtain a standard clonogenic survival curve using the assay of Puck and Marcus and, with a different set of flasks containing cloning densities of unirradiated cells, to assay the cell killing caused by medium harvested from 2 x 10(5) cells irradiated with the same doses. The data show that for this human epithelial cell line, doses of 0.01-0. 5 Gy show clonogenic death by the bystander effect only, if maximum potential bystander killing is assumed. The magnitude of the effect is relatively constant, and it appears to saturate at doses in the range of 0.03-0.05 Gy. After doses greater than 0.5 Gy, the curves for clonogenic death are the result of a dose-dependent non-bystander effect and a dose-independent bystander effect. If these particular dose-response effects occur in epithelial cells in vivo, they may have important consequences for therapy and studies of low-dose risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10790270     DOI: 10.1667/0033-7587(2000)153[0508:rcobat]2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  34 in total

Review 1.  Hormesis, an update of the present position.

Authors:  Lennart Johansson
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-04-26       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Cytogenetic effect of low dose gamma-radiation in Hordeum vulgare seedlings: non-linear dose-effect relationship.

Authors:  Stanislav A Geras'kin; Alla A Oudalova; Jin Kyu Kim; Vladimir G Dikarev; Nina S Dikareva
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  A role for bioelectric effects in the induction of bystander signals by ionizing radiation?

Authors:  C Mothersill; G Moran; F McNeill; M D Gow; J Denbeigh; W Prestwich; C B Seymour
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  Radiation-induced bystander effects: evidence for an adaptive response to low dose exposures?

Authors:  Carmel Mothersill; Colin Seymour
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-08-25       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  Will radiation-induced bystander effects or adaptive responses impact on the shape of the dose response relationships at low doses of ionizing radiation?

Authors:  William F Morgan
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-08-25       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Mechanistic basis for nonlinear dose-response relationships for low-dose radiation-induced stochastic effects.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott; Dale M Walker; Yohannes Tesfaigzi; Helmut Schöllnberger; Vernon Walker
Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med       Date:  2003-01

7.  Nonlinear response for neoplastic transformation following low doses of low let radiation.

Authors:  J Leslie Redpath
Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med       Date:  2005-01

8.  The bystander effect: recent developments and implications for understanding the dose response.

Authors:  R E J Mitchel
Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med       Date:  2004-07

9.  Computational modeling of cellular effects post-irradiation with low- and high-let particles and different absorbed doses.

Authors:  Adriana Alexandre S Tavares; João Manuel R S Tavares
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 2.658

10.  Radiolabeling and in vitro evaluation of (67)Ga-NOTA-modular nanotransporter--a potential Auger electron emitting EGFR-targeted radiotherapeutic.

Authors:  Eftychia Koumarianou; Tatiana A Slastnikova; Marek Pruszynski; Andrey A Rosenkranz; Ganesan Vaidyanathan; Alexander S Sobolev; Michael R Zalutsky
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 2.408

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.