Literature DB >> 23979656

Observations on the removal of brood inoculated with Tropilaelaps mercedesae (Acari: Laelapidae) and the mite's reproductive success in Apis mellifera colonies.

Kitiphong Khongphinitbunjong1, Lilia I de Guzman, Ninat Buawangpong, Thomas E Rinderer, Amanda M Frake, Panuwan Chantawannakul.   

Abstract

This study assessed the response of Apis mellifera to brood deliberately infested with Tropilaelaps mercedesae. The reproductive success of T. mercedesae in mite-inoculated and naturally infested brood was also compared. The presence of T. mercedesae inside brood cells significantly affected brood removal. Thai A. mellifera removed 52.6 ± 8.2 % of the brood inoculated with T. mercedesae as compared to 17.2 ± 1.8 and 5.7 ± 1.1 % removal rates for the groups of brood with their cell cappings opened and closed without mite inoculation and the control brood (undisturbed, no mite inoculation), respectively. Brood removal peaked during the second and third days post inoculation when test brood was at the prepupal stage. Overall, non-reproduction (NR) of foundress T. mercedesae was high. However, when NR was measured based on the criteria used for Varroa, the naturally infested pupae (NIP) supported the highest NR (92.8 %). Newly sealed larvae inoculated with Tropilaelaps collected from newly sealed larvae (NSL) had 78.2 % NR and those inoculated with Tropilaelaps collected from tan-bodied pupae (TBP) had 76.8 % NR. Since Tropilaelaps is known to have a short development period and nearly all progeny reach adulthood by the time of host emergence, we also used two Tropilaelaps-specific criteria to determine NR. Foundresses that did not produce progeny and those that produced only one progeny were considered NR. Using these two criteria, NR decreased tremendously but showed similar trends with means of 65, 40 and 33 % for NIP, NSL and TBP, respectively. High NR in the NIP group may indicate increased hygienic behavior in Thai A. mellifera colonies. The removal of infested prepupae or tan-bodied pupae will likely decrease the reproductive potential of Tropilaelaps. Our study suggests that brood removal may be one of the resistance mechanisms towards T. mercedesae by naturally adapted Thai A. mellifera.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23979656     DOI: 10.1007/s10493-013-9728-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol        ISSN: 0168-8162            Impact factor:   2.132


  7 in total

1.  The reproductive program of female Varroa destructor mites is triggered by its host, Apis mellifera.

Authors:  Claudia Garrido; Peter Rosenkranz
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.132

Review 2.  Defecation behavior and ecology of insects.

Authors:  Martha R Weiss
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 19.686

3.  Asynchronous development of honey bee host and Varroa destructor (Mesostigmata: Varroidae) influences reproductive potential of mites.

Authors:  Maria J Kirrane; Lilia I De Guzman; Thomas E Rinderer; Amanda M Frake; Jeremy Wagnitz; Pádraig M Whelan
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  Genotypic variability and relationships between mite infestation levels, mite damage, grooming intensity, and removal of Varroa destructor mites in selected strains of worker honey bees (Apis mellifera L.).

Authors:  Ernesto Guzman-Novoa; Berna Emsen; Peter Unger; Laura G Espinosa-Montaño; Tatiana Petukhova
Journal:  J Invertebr Pathol       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 5.  Parasitic mites of honey bees: life history, implications, and impact.

Authors:  D Sammataro; U Gerson; G Needham
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 19.686

6.  Comparative reproduction of Varroa destructor in different types of Russian and Italian honey bee combs.

Authors:  Lilia I de Guzman; Thomas E Rinderer; Amanda M Frake
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 2.132

7.  Associations of parameters related to the fall of Varroa destructor (Mesostigmata: Varroidae) in Russian and Italian honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) colonies.

Authors:  Thomas E Rinderer; Lilia I De Guzman; Amanda M Frake
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.381

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Semi-automatic detection of honeybee brood hygiene-an example of artificial learning to facilitate ethological studies on social insects.

Authors:  Philipp Batz; Andreas Ruttor; Sebastian Thiel; Jakob Wegener; Fred Zautke; Christoph Schwekendiek; Kaspar Bienefeld
Journal:  Biol Methods Protoc       Date:  2022-02-16

2.  Tropilaelaps mercedesae parasitism changes behavior and gene expression in honey bee workers.

Authors:  Jing Gao; Shilong Ma; Xinling Wang; Yang Yang; Qihua Luo; Xing Wang; Feng Liu; Qiang Wang; Zhongmin Fu; Qingyun Diao; Pingli Dai
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 6.823

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.