Literature DB >> 22465569

Genotypic variability and relationships between mite infestation levels, mite damage, grooming intensity, and removal of Varroa destructor mites in selected strains of worker honey bees (Apis mellifera L.).

Ernesto Guzman-Novoa1, Berna Emsen, Peter Unger, Laura G Espinosa-Montaño, Tatiana Petukhova.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to demonstrate genotypic variability and analyze the relationships between the infestation levels of the parasitic mite Varroa destructor in honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies, the rate of damage of fallen mites, and the intensity with which bees of different genotypes groom themselves to remove mites from their bodies. Sets of paired genotypes that are presumably susceptible and resistant to the varroa mite were compared at the colony level for number of mites falling on sticky papers and for proportion of damaged mites. They were also compared at the individual level for intensity of grooming and mite removal success. Bees from the "resistant" colonies had lower mite population rates (up to 15 fold) and higher percentages of damaged mites (up to 9 fold) than bees from the "susceptible" genotypes. At the individual level, bees from the "resistant" genotypes performed significantly more instances of intense grooming (up to 4 fold), and a significantly higher number of mites were dislodged from the bees' bodies by intense grooming than by light grooming (up to 7 fold) in all genotypes. The odds of mite removal were high and significant for all "resistant" genotypes when compared with the "susceptible" genotypes. The results of this study strongly suggest that grooming behavior and the intensity with which bees perform it, is an important component in the resistance of some honey bee genotypes to the growth of varroa mite populations. The implications of these results are discussed.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22465569     DOI: 10.1016/j.jip.2012.03.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Invertebr Pathol        ISSN: 0022-2011            Impact factor:   2.841


  23 in total

1.  The effect of queen pheromone status on Varroa mite removal from honey bee colonies with different grooming ability.

Authors:  Rassol Bahreini; Robert W Currie
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 2.132

2.  Honey Bee Genetic Stock Determines Deformed Wing Virus Symptom Severity but not Viral Load or Dissemination Following Pupal Exposure.

Authors:  Hannah J Penn; Michael D Simone-Finstrom; Yanping Chen; Kristen B Healy
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Differences in Varroa destructor infestation rates of two indigenous subspecies of Apis mellifera in the Republic of South Africa.

Authors:  Ashley N Mortensen; Daniel R Schmehl; Mike Allsopp; Tomas A Bustamante; Chase B Kimmel; Mark E Dykes; James D Ellis
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 2.132

4.  Observations on the removal of brood inoculated with Tropilaelaps mercedesae (Acari: Laelapidae) and the mite's reproductive success in Apis mellifera colonies.

Authors:  Kitiphong Khongphinitbunjong; Lilia I de Guzman; Ninat Buawangpong; Thomas E Rinderer; Amanda M Frake; Panuwan Chantawannakul
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 2.132

5.  Lower virus infections in Varroa destructor-infested and uninfested brood and adult honey bees (Apis mellifera) of a low mite population growth colony compared to a high mite population growth colony.

Authors:  Berna Emsen; Mollah Md Hamiduzzaman; Paul H Goodwin; Ernesto Guzman-Novoa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Ecological and evolutionary approaches to managing honeybee disease.

Authors:  Berry J Brosi; Keith S Delaplane; Michael Boots; Jacobus C de Roode
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 15.460

7.  Norwegian honey bees surviving Varroa destructor mite infestations by means of natural selection.

Authors:  Melissa A Y Oddie; Bjørn Dahle; Peter Neumann
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Hygienic and grooming behaviors in African and European honeybees-New damage categories in Varroa destructor.

Authors:  Beatrice T Nganso; Ayuka T Fombong; Abdullahi A Yusuf; Christian W W Pirk; Charles Stuhl; Baldwyn Torto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Fine-scale linkage mapping reveals a small set of candidate genes influencing honey bee grooming behavior in response to Varroa mites.

Authors:  Miguel E Arechavaleta-Velasco; Karla Alcala-Escamilla; Carlos Robles-Rios; Jennifer M Tsuruda; Greg J Hunt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Varroa destructor (Mesostigmata: Varroidae) Parasitism and Climate Differentially Influence the Prevalence, Levels, and Overt Infections of Deformed Wing Virus in Honey Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae).

Authors:  Ricardo Anguiano-Baez; Ernesto Guzman-Novoa; Mollah Md Hamiduzzaman; Laura G Espinosa-Montaño; Adriana Correa-Benítez
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 1.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.