Literature DB >> 18392942

Comparative reproduction of Varroa destructor in different types of Russian and Italian honey bee combs.

Lilia I de Guzman1, Thomas E Rinderer, Amanda M Frake.   

Abstract

Earlier studies showed that Russian honey bees support slow growth of varroa mite population. We studied whether or not comb type influenced varroa reproduction in both Russian and Italian honey bees, and whether Russian bees produced comb which inhibited varroa reproduction. The major differences found in this study concerned honey bee type. Overall, the Russian honey bees had lower (2.44 +/- 0.18%) levels of varroa infestation than Italian honey bees (7.20 +/- 0.60%). This decreased infestation resulted in part from a reduced number of viable female offspring per foundress in the Russian (0.85 +/- 0.04 female) compared to the Italian (1.23 +/- 0.04 females) honey bee colonies. In addition, there was an effect by the comb built by the Russian honey bee colonies that reduced varroa reproduction. When comparing combs having Russian or Italian colony origins, Russian honey bee colonies had more non-reproducing foundress mites and fewer viable female offspring in Russian honey bee comb. This difference did not occur in Italian colonies. The age of comb in this study had mixed effects. Older comb produced similar responses for six of the seven varroa infestation parameters measured. In colonies of Italian honey bees, the older comb (2001 dark) had fewer (1.13 +/- 0.07 females) viable female offspring per foundress than were found in the 2002 new (1.21 +/- 0.06 females) and 1980s new (1.36 +/- 0.08 females) combs. This difference did not occur with Russian honey bee colonies where the number of viable female offspring was low in all three types of combs. This study suggests that honey bee type largely influences growth of varroa mite population in a colony.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18392942     DOI: 10.1007/s10493-008-9142-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol        ISSN: 0168-8162            Impact factor:   2.132


  2 in total

1.  Determination of acaricides in honey by high-performance liquid chromatography with photodiode array detection.

Authors:  Anne-Claire Martel; Sarah Zeggane
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2002-04-19       Impact factor: 4.759

2.  Solid phase microextraction and gas chromatography with ion trap detector (GC-ITD) analysis of amitraz residues in beeswax after hydrolysis to 2,4-dimethylaniline.

Authors:  Jan Lenícek; Milan Sekyra; Andrea Rychtecká Novotná; Eva Vásová; Dalibor Titera; Vladimír Veselý
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 6.558

  2 in total
  8 in total

1.  Observations on the removal of brood inoculated with Tropilaelaps mercedesae (Acari: Laelapidae) and the mite's reproductive success in Apis mellifera colonies.

Authors:  Kitiphong Khongphinitbunjong; Lilia I de Guzman; Ninat Buawangpong; Thomas E Rinderer; Amanda M Frake; Panuwan Chantawannakul
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 2.132

2.  Genomic survey of the ectoparasitic mite Varroa destructor, a major pest of the honey bee Apis mellifera.

Authors:  Scott R Cornman; Michael C Schatz; Spencer J Johnston; Yan-Ping Chen; Jeff Pettis; Greg Hunt; Lanie Bourgeois; Chris Elsik; Denis Anderson; Christina M Grozinger; Jay D Evans
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 3.969

3.  Phenotypic and genetic analyses of the varroa sensitive hygienic trait in Russian honey bee (hymenoptera: apidae) colonies.

Authors:  Maria J Kirrane; Lilia I de Guzman; Beth Holloway; Amanda M Frake; Thomas E Rinderer; Pádraig M Whelan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Population growth of Varroa destructor (Acari: Varroidae) in honey bee colonies is affected by the number of foragers with mites.

Authors:  Gloria DeGrandi-Hoffman; Fabiana Ahumada; Victor Zazueta; Mona Chambers; Geoffrey Hidalgo; Emily Watkins deJong
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 2.132

Review 5.  Geographical Distribution and Selection of European Honey Bees Resistant to Varroa destructor.

Authors:  Yves Le Conte; Marina D Meixner; Annely Brandt; Norman L Carreck; Cecilia Costa; Fanny Mondet; Ralph Büchler
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 2.769

Review 6.  Natural selection, selective breeding, and the evolution of resistance of honeybees (Apis mellifera) against Varroa.

Authors:  Jacques J M van Alphen; Bart Jan Fernhout
Journal:  Zoological Lett       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 2.836

7.  Reproductive capacity of varroa destructor in four different honey bee subspecies.

Authors:  Richard Odemer
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 8.  Advances and perspectives in selecting resistance traits against the parasitic mite Varroa destructor in honey bees.

Authors:  Matthieu Guichard; Vincent Dietemann; Markus Neuditschko; Benjamin Dainat
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 4.297

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.