Literature DB >> 21882676

Asynchronous development of honey bee host and Varroa destructor (Mesostigmata: Varroidae) influences reproductive potential of mites.

Maria J Kirrane1, Lilia I De Guzman, Thomas E Rinderer, Amanda M Frake, Jeremy Wagnitz, Pádraig M Whelan.   

Abstract

A high proportion of nonreproductive (NR) Varroa destructor Anderson & Trueman (Mesostigmata: Varroidae), is commonly observed in honey bee colonies displaying the varroa sensitive hygienic trait (VSH). This study was conducted to determine the influence of brood removal and subsequent host reinvasion of varroa mites on mite reproduction. We collected foundress mites from stages of brood (newly sealed larvae, prepupae, white-eyed pupae, and pink-eyed pupae) and phoretic mites from adult bees. We then inoculated these mites into cells containing newly sealed larvae. Successful reproduction (foundress laid both a mature male and female) was low (13%) but most common in mites coming from sealed larvae. Unsuccessful reproductive attempts (foundress failed to produce both a mature male and female) were most common in mites from sealed larvae (22%) and prepupae (61%). Lack of any progeny was most common for mites from white-eyed (83%) and pink-eyed pupae (92%). We also collected foundress mites from sealed larvae and transferred them to cells containing newly sealed larvae, prepupae, white-eyed pupae, or pink-eyed pupae. Successful reproduction only occurred in the transfers to sealed larvae (26%). Unsuccessful reproductive attempts were most common in transfers to newly sealed larvae (40%) and to prepupae (25%). Unsuccessful attempts involved the production of immature progeny (60%), the production of only mature daughters (26%) or the production of only a mature male (14%). Generally, lack of progeny was not associated with mites having a lack of stored sperm. Our results suggest that mites exposed to the removal of prepupae or older brood due to hygiene are unlikely to produce viable mites if they invade new hosts soon after brood removal. Asynchrony between the reproductive status of reinvading mites and the developmental stage of their reinvasion hosts may be a primary cause of NR mites in hygienic colonies. Even if reinvading mites use hosts having the proper age for infestation, only a minority of them will reproduce.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21882676     DOI: 10.1603/ec11035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Econ Entomol        ISSN: 0022-0493            Impact factor:   2.381


  9 in total

1.  Using an in vitro system for maintaining Varroa destructor mites on Apis mellifera pupae as hosts: studies of mite longevity and feeding behavior.

Authors:  Noble I Egekwu; Francisco Posada; Daniel E Sonenshine; Steven Cook
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 2.132

2.  Observations on the removal of brood inoculated with Tropilaelaps mercedesae (Acari: Laelapidae) and the mite's reproductive success in Apis mellifera colonies.

Authors:  Kitiphong Khongphinitbunjong; Lilia I de Guzman; Ninat Buawangpong; Thomas E Rinderer; Amanda M Frake; Panuwan Chantawannakul
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 2.132

3.  Phenotypic and genetic analyses of the varroa sensitive hygienic trait in Russian honey bee (hymenoptera: apidae) colonies.

Authors:  Maria J Kirrane; Lilia I de Guzman; Beth Holloway; Amanda M Frake; Thomas E Rinderer; Pádraig M Whelan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Lower virus infections in Varroa destructor-infested and uninfested brood and adult honey bees (Apis mellifera) of a low mite population growth colony compared to a high mite population growth colony.

Authors:  Berna Emsen; Mollah Md Hamiduzzaman; Paul H Goodwin; Ernesto Guzman-Novoa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Stock-specific chemical brood signals are induced by Varroa and Deformed Wing Virus, and elicit hygienic response in the honey bee.

Authors:  K Wagoner; M Spivak; A Hefetz; T Reams; O Rueppell
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  High-resolution linkage analyses to identify genes that influence Varroa sensitive hygiene behavior in honey bees.

Authors:  Jennifer M Tsuruda; Jeffrey W Harris; Lanie Bourgeois; Robert G Danka; Greg J Hunt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Impact of the Phoretic Phase on Reproduction and Damage Caused by Varroa destructor (Anderson and Trueman) to Its Host, the European Honey Bee (Apis mellifera L.).

Authors:  Vincent Piou; Jérémy Tabart; Virginie Urrutia; Jean-Louis Hemptinne; Angélique Vétillard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Advances and perspectives in selecting resistance traits against the parasitic mite Varroa destructor in honey bees.

Authors:  Matthieu Guichard; Vincent Dietemann; Markus Neuditschko; Benjamin Dainat
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  Standard Methods for Dissection of Varroa destructor Females.

Authors:  Vincent Piou; Caroline Vilarem; Carolin Rein; Lina Sprau; Angélique Vétillard
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 2.769

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.