Lucille Sanzero Eller1, Elise L Lev2, Amy Feurer3. 1. Rutgers University, College of Nursing, 180 University Avenue, Newark, NJ 07102, USA. Electronic address: eller@rutgers.edu. 2. Rutgers University, College of Nursing, 180 University Avenue, Newark, NJ 07102, USA. Electronic address: eliselev@rutgers.edu. 3. Bon Secours Memorial College of Nursing, 8550 Magellan Parkway, Richmond, VA 23227, USA. Electronic address: Amy_Feurer@bshsi.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the recognized importance of mentoring, little is known about specific mentoring behaviors that result in positive outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To identify key components of an effective mentoring relationship identified by protégés-mentor dyads in an academic setting. METHODS: In this qualitative study, purposive sampling resulted in geographic diversity and representation of a range of academic disciplines. Participants were from 12 universities in three regions of the U.S. (South, n=5; Northeast, n=4; Midwest, n=2) and Puerto Rico (n=1). Academic disciplines included natural sciences (51%), nursing/health sciences (31%), engineering (8%), and technology (1%). Twelve workshops using the Technology of Participation method were held with 117 mentor-protégé dyads. Consensus was reached regarding the key components of an effective mentoring relationship. RESULTS: Conventional content analysis, in which coding categories were informed by the literature and derived directly from the data, was employed. Eight themes described key components of an effective mentoring relationship: (1) open communication and accessibility; (2) goals and challenges; (3) passion and inspiration; (4) caring personal relationship; (5) mutual respect and trust; (6) exchange of knowledge; (7) independence and collaboration; and (8) role modeling. Described within each theme are specific mentor-protégé behaviors and interactions, identified needs of both protégé and mentor in the relationship, and desirable personal qualities of mentor and protégé. CONCLUSIONS: Findings can inform a dialog between existing nurse mentor-protégé dyads as well as student nurses and faculty members considering a mentoring relationship. Nurse educators can evaluate and modify their mentoring behaviors as needed, thereby strengthening the mentor-protégé relationship to ensure positive outcomes of the learning process.
BACKGROUND: Despite the recognized importance of mentoring, little is known about specific mentoring behaviors that result in positive outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To identify key components of an effective mentoring relationship identified by protégés-mentor dyads in an academic setting. METHODS: In this qualitative study, purposive sampling resulted in geographic diversity and representation of a range of academic disciplines. Participants were from 12 universities in three regions of the U.S. (South, n=5; Northeast, n=4; Midwest, n=2) and Puerto Rico (n=1). Academic disciplines included natural sciences (51%), nursing/health sciences (31%), engineering (8%), and technology (1%). Twelve workshops using the Technology of Participation method were held with 117 mentor-protégé dyads. Consensus was reached regarding the key components of an effective mentoring relationship. RESULTS: Conventional content analysis, in which coding categories were informed by the literature and derived directly from the data, was employed. Eight themes described key components of an effective mentoring relationship: (1) open communication and accessibility; (2) goals and challenges; (3) passion and inspiration; (4) caring personal relationship; (5) mutual respect and trust; (6) exchange of knowledge; (7) independence and collaboration; and (8) role modeling. Described within each theme are specific mentor-protégé behaviors and interactions, identified needs of both protégé and mentor in the relationship, and desirable personal qualities of mentor and protégé. CONCLUSIONS: Findings can inform a dialog between existing nurse mentor-protégé dyads as well as student nurses and faculty members considering a mentoring relationship. Nurse educators can evaluate and modify their mentoring behaviors as needed, thereby strengthening the mentor-protégé relationship to ensure positive outcomes of the learning process.
Authors: Amanda K Hund; Amber C Churchill; Akasha M Faist; Caroline A Havrilla; Sierra M Love Stowell; Helen F McCreery; Julienne Ng; Cheryl A Pinzone; Elizabeth S C Scordato Journal: Ecol Evol Date: 2018-10-02 Impact factor: 2.912
Authors: Folakemi T Odedina; Linda S Behar-Horenstein; Parisa Fathi; Ernest Kaninjing; Jennifer Nguyen; Nissa Askins; R Renee Reams; Bereket Mochona; Adaora Ezeani; Debra Lyon; Kayanna Jacobs; Michael Maduka Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2022-02 Impact factor: 1.771