Literature DB >> 16436570

Meeting the challenges facing clinical research: solutions proposed by leaders of medical specialty and clinical research societies.

Horacio Murillo1, E Albert Reece, Ralph Snyderman, Nancy S Sung.   

Abstract

The development of a robust national clinical research enterprise is needed to improve health care, but faces formidable challenges. To define the impediments and formulate solutions, the Institute of Medicine's Clinical Research Roundtable convened leaders from medical specialty and clinical research societies in 2003. Participants considered how to influence clinical research funding priorities, promote mechanisms to train physicians and other health care professionals to conduct clinical research, and how to encourage health care providers to follow evidence-based medical practice. Consensus emerged on multiple issues, including intersociety collaboration, the need for a core clinical research curriculum for training the new cadre of clinical researchers, joint advocacy for increased funding of clinical research and for the education of policymakers and the public on the benefits of clinical research. Specific recommendations were made on mechanisms for recruitment, training, and retention of clinical research trainees and mentors. Steps were outlined (1) to overcome career disincentives and develop appropriate reward systems for mentors and trainees, (2) to encourage use of web-based and continuing-medical-education-based mechanisms to bring practitioners up to date on issues in and results of clinical research, and (3) to create incentives for individuals, clinics, and hospitals to practice evidence-based medicine (EBM). Collectively, the response and proposed strategies can serve as a roadmap to improve clinical research funding and training, evidence-based medical practice, and health care quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16436570     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200602000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  17 in total

Review 1.  Building a pipeline of training for behavioral diabetes researchers and clinicians: a call for national dialogue.

Authors:  Mary de Groot; Lawrence Fisher
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.810

2.  Designing and implementing INTREPID, an intensive program in translational research methodologies for new investigators.

Authors:  Claudia S Plottel; Yindalon Aphinyanaphongs; Yongzhao Shao; Keith J Micoli; Yixin Fang; Judith D Goldberg; Claudia R Galeano; Jessica H Stangel; Deborah Chavis-Keeling; Judith S Hochman; Bruce N Cronstein; Michael H Pillinger
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 4.689

3.  Comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  J A Hirsch; P W Schaefer; J M Romero; J D Rabinov; P C Sanelli; L Manchikanti
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Mentoring the next generation of physician-scientists in Japan: a cross-sectional survey of mentees in six academic medical centers.

Authors:  Ken Sakushima; Hiroki Mishina; Shunichi Fukuhara; Kenei Sada; Junji Koizumi; Takashi Sugioka; Naoto Kobayashi; Masaharu Nishimura; Junichiro Mori; Hirofumi Makino; Mitchell D Feldman
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Organizing a Multidisciplinary Research Team: Strategies, Execution, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Jennifer M Sterbenz; Jacob S Nasser; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Gathering and learning from relevant clinical data: a new framework.

Authors:  Michael Farias; Kevin G Friedman; James E Lock; Rahul H Rathod
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 6.893

7.  Eleven-year outcomes from an integrated residency program to train research psychiatrists.

Authors:  Alexander C Tsai; Anna E Ordóñez; Victor I Reus; Carol A Mathews
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 6.893

8.  Key components of an effective mentoring relationship: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Lucille Sanzero Eller; Elise L Lev; Amy Feurer
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.442

9.  Geffen Faculty Highlight Concerns Linking CAIM and Conventional Researchers at UCLA Symposium.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Logue
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2008-08-02       Impact factor: 2.629

10.  6th year medical students' future specialty preferences: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Soha Nafez Al-Beitawi; Tariq N Al-Shatanawi; Suhair Adel Qudsieh; Ehab Ibrahim Abu Marar; Mazhar Salim Al Zoubi; Mohammad Al-Zubi
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-05-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.