PURPOSE: T2 mapping techniques use the relaxation constant as an indirect marker of cartilage structure, and the relaxation constant has also been shown to be a sensitive parameter for cartilage evaluation. As a possible additional robust biomarker, T2* relaxation time is a potential, clinically feasible parameter for the biochemical evaluation of articular cartilage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The knees of 15 healthy volunteers and 15 patients after microfracture therapy (MFX) were evaluated with a multi-echo spin-echo T2 mapping technique and a multi-echo gradient-echo T2* mapping sequence at 3.0 Tesla MRI. Inline maps, using a log-linear least squares fitting method, were assessed with respect to the zonal dependency of T2 and T2* relaxation for the deep and superficial regions of healthy articular cartilage and cartilage repair tissue. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant correlation between T2 and T2* values. Both parameters demonstrated similar spatial dependency, with longer values measured toward the articular surface for healthy articular cartilage. No spatial variation was observed for cartilage repair tissue after MFX. CONCLUSIONS: Within this feasibility study, both T2 and T2* relaxation parameters demonstrated a similar response in the assessment of articular cartilage and cartilage repair tissue. The potential advantages of T2*-mapping of cartilage include faster imaging times and the opportunity for 3D acquisitions, thereby providing greater spatial resolution and complete coverage of the articular surface.
PURPOSE: T2 mapping techniques use the relaxation constant as an indirect marker of cartilage structure, and the relaxation constant has also been shown to be a sensitive parameter for cartilage evaluation. As a possible additional robust biomarker, T2* relaxation time is a potential, clinically feasible parameter for the biochemical evaluation of articular cartilage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The knees of 15 healthy volunteers and 15 patients after microfracture therapy (MFX) were evaluated with a multi-echo spin-echo T2 mapping technique and a multi-echo gradient-echo T2* mapping sequence at 3.0 Tesla MRI. Inline maps, using a log-linear least squares fitting method, were assessed with respect to the zonal dependency of T2 and T2* relaxation for the deep and superficial regions of healthy articular cartilage and cartilage repair tissue. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant correlation between T2 and T2* values. Both parameters demonstrated similar spatial dependency, with longer values measured toward the articular surface for healthy articular cartilage. No spatial variation was observed for cartilage repair tissue after MFX. CONCLUSIONS: Within this feasibility study, both T2 and T2* relaxation parameters demonstrated a similar response in the assessment of articular cartilage and cartilage repair tissue. The potential advantages of T2*-mapping of cartilage include faster imaging times and the opportunity for 3D acquisitions, thereby providing greater spatial resolution and complete coverage of the articular surface.
Authors: H E Smith; T J Mosher; B J Dardzinski; B G Collins; C M Collins; Q X Yang; V J Schmithorst; M B Smith Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: M T Nieminen; J Rieppo; J Töyräs; J M Hakumäki; J Silvennoinen; M M Hyttinen; H J Helminen; J S Jurvelin Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: M A Bredella; P F Tirman; C G Peterfy; M Zarlingo; J F Feller; F W Bost; J P Belzer; T K Wischer; H K Genant Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 1999-04 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Lawrence M White; Marshall S Sussman; Mark Hurtig; Linda Probyn; George Tomlinson; Rita Kandel Journal: Radiology Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Gunnar Knutsen; Lars Engebretsen; Tom C Ludvigsen; Jon Olav Drogset; Torbjørn Grøntvedt; Eirik Solheim; Torbjørn Strand; Sally Roberts; Vidar Isaksen; Oddmund Johansen Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Rexford D Newbould; Sam R Miller; Laurence D Toms; Peter Swann; Jeroen A W Tielbeek; Garry E Gold; Robin K Strachan; Peter C Taylor; Paul M Matthews; Andrew P Brown Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2012-02-07 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Vanessa A Lukas; Kenneth W Fishbein; Ping-Chang Lin; Michael Schär; Erika Schneider; Corey P Neu; Richard G Spencer; David A Reiter Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2015-03-05 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Keegan K Hovis; Hamza Alizai; Seng-Choe Tham; Richard B Souza; Michael C Nevitt; Charles E McCulloch; Thomas M Link Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2012-02-25 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Suzanne E L Detiger; Roderick M Holewijn; Roel J W Hoogendoorn; Barend J van Royen; Marco N Helder; Ferco H Berger; Joost P A Kuijer; Theo H Smit Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2014-08-05 Impact factor: 3.134