Literature DB >> 23974299

Arterial distensibility in patients with ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms: is it a predisposing factor for rupture risk?

Abdurrahim Dusak1, Kaan Kamasak, Cemil Goya, Mehmet E Adin, Mehmet A Elbey, Aslan Bilici.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A risk factor assessment that reliably predicts whether patients are predisposed to intracranial aneurysm (IA) rupture has yet to be formulated. As such, the clinical management of unruptured IA remains unclear. Our aim was to determine whether impaired arterial distensibility and hypertrophic remodeling might be indicators of risk for IA rupture. MATERIAL/
METHODS: The study population (n=49) was selected from consecutive admissions for either unruptured IA (n=23) or ruptured IA (n=26) from January to December 2010. Hemodynamic measures were taken from every patient, including systolic and diastolic blood pressure using a sphygmomanometer. Unruptured IA and ruptured IA characteristics, including aneurysmal shape, size, angle, aspect ratio, and bottleneck factor, were measured and calculated from transverse brain CT angiography images. With ultrasound, the right common carotid artery intima-media thickness was measured, as well as the lumen diameter during systole and diastole. Arterial wall strain, distensibility, stiffness index, and elastic modulus were calculated and compared between patients with unruptured IAs and ruptured IAs. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: General demographic data did not differ between patients with unruptured IAs and ruptured IAs. Greater mean intima-media thickness (p=0.013), mean stiffness index (p=0.044), and mean elastic modulus (p=0.026) were observed for patients with ruptured IAs. Moreover, mean strain (p=0.013) and mean distensibility (p=0.024) were decreased in patients with ruptured IAs.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ruptured IAs demonstrated decreased arterial distensibility and increased intima-media thickness at the level of the carotid arteries. By measuring these parameters via ultrasound, it may be possible to predict whether patients with existing IAs might rupture and hemorrhage into the subarachnoid space.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23974299      PMCID: PMC3762537          DOI: 10.12659/MSM.889032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Monit        ISSN: 1234-1010


Background

Population-based and autopsy studies report that the incidence of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) may be as high as 10% and peaks in the sixth decade of life. Females with a family history of IA are especially at risk [1-3]. Subarachnoid hemorrhages (SAHs) due to ruptured IAs account for 10% and 40% of deaths before hospitalization and after a 1-month hospital stay, respectively [1,4]. More than 35% of patients with SAH develop major neurological deficits preceding hospital discharge, even if they demonstrated favorable Glasgow Coma Scores [5-8]. Although it is easier to detect unruptured IAs with various imaging modalities, it is difficult to predict if or when they will rupture, which poses a dilemma for both patients and physicians [9-11]. Acquired and hereditary risk factors contribute to the multifactorial etiology of unruptured IA, including sex, hypertension, atherosclerosis, alcohol consumption, and smoking [12]. Parameters utilized for rupture assessment include aneurysm size, shape, and location, in addition to angle and flow hemodynamics [13-18]. Cumulative arterial wall deterioration as a result of constant remodeling characterized by degeneration and inflammatory cell infiltration lead to IA rupture and subsequent SAH [19,20]. Altered arterial wall elastic properties and hypertrophic remodeling might predispose IAs to rupture [21-23]. Arterial wall elasticity and intima-media thickness can be estimated non-invasively via ultrasound to indirectly evaluate arterial wall strength [24-26]. We hypothesized that hypertrophic intimal remodeling and impaired elastic properties detected in the right carotid artery might co-occur with IA rupture and thus may predict an impending IA rupture.

Material and Methods

A total of 49 patients consecutively admitted with a diagnosis of IA (n=23) or ruptured IA (n=26) between January and December 2010 were included in this study. Study subjects were screened and removed from the study if they qualified for the following exclusion criteria: history of stroke, heart failure, severe heart valve disease, renal dysfunction, diabetes mellitus (DM), and local or systemic acute infection. The study protocol was designed in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration and was approved by the institutional ethics committee. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Blood pressure measurement

Maximum blood pressure (BPmax) was the systolic BP and minimum blood pressure (BPmin) was the diastolic BP. Blood pressure was measured from the right brachial artery with a sphygmomanometer (Omron HEM 705CP, Colson) after a 10-minute resting period. Heart rate and BP were measured just before ultrasound examination, and within the first 3 days following IA rupture to avoid falsely elevated BPs from SAH-induced vasospasm.

Ultrasound examination

Ultrasound examinations were performed for patients with ruptured IAs within the first 3 days of rupture to avoid SAH induced vasospasm and following DSA. Specifically, the Aplio XG scanner equipped with a 10 MHz linear array transducer (Toshiba Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan) was used. A pulse repetition frequency of 3 kHz with an automatic cutoff filter ranging from 1 to 3 kHz was utilized. M-mode ultrasound was performed at a speed of 50 mm/sec. The right common carotid artery (CCA) was examined while the patient assumed the supine position with slight head elevation. The transducer was positioned parallel to the CCA such that the lumen’s diameter was maximized in the longitudinal plane. Maximum (Dmax) and minimum (Dmin) internal lumen diameters were measured at 1 to 2 cm proximal to the CCA bifurcation in magnified M-mode during systole and diastole. Intima-media thickness measurements were taken at this same location, but were derived in B-mode.

Elastic properties

Arterial elastic properties, including distensibility, strain, stiffness index, and elastic modulus, were measured to determine the stress on the right CCA wall during diastole and systole [27,28]. Strain was defined as the percent change in CCA artery lumen diameter during systole and diastole. The following calculations were performed to determine the aforementioned measures:

Statistics

Statistical Package for the Social Sciences for Windows (SPSS ver. 18, Chicago, IL, USA) software was used to analyze all data. Descriptive parameters were expressed as the mean ± the standard deviation or via percentages. Variations between groups were compared with the Mann-Whitney U test. Correlation analyses were performed with the Spearman test. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant. The right CCA internal diameter was measured by an expert, blinded observer (A.D.). To evaluate inter-observer reliability, minimum and maximum CCA internal diameter and distensibility were also calculated by a second observer (M.I.). An inter-class correlation coefficient (ICC) above 0.72 was considered sufficient.

Results

A comparison between unruptured IA and ruptured IA groups in terms of demographics and aneurysm characteristics is provided in Table 1. There were no differences in age, sex, and heart rate between groups. Patients with unruptured IA had a mean age of 47.1±12.0 years, with ages that ranged from 26 to 68 years. Patients with ruptured IA had a mean age of 48.6±11.5 years, ranging from 31 to 67 years. Unruptured IA and ruptured IA characteristics included shape, size, angle, aspect ratio, and bottleneck factor. For the entire study population, unruptured IA and ruptured IA locations included the internal carotid artery (ICA) in 14% of cases, the anterior communicating artery (ACoA) in 20% of cases, the middle cerebral artery (MCA) in 41% of cases, and the vertebral and basilar arteries (V-B) in 25% of of cases (Figures 1 and 2).
Table 1

Demographic data and aneurysm characteristic comparisons.

ParameterUnruptured IAs (n=23)Ruptured IAs (n=26)p-value
Age (years)47.1±12.048.6±11.50.42

Gender (male/female)9/1410/160.19

BMI (kg/m2)25.1±2.727.5±2.30.35

Heart rate (/min)69±774±80.23

IAs LocationICA n (%)4 (57%)3 (43%)0.21
ACoA n (%)3 (30%)7 (70%)0.01
MCA n (%)9 (45%)11 (55%)0.07
V-B n (%)7 (58%)5 (42%)0.02

ShapeSphere n (%)9 (69%)4 (31%)0.01
Oval n (%)9 (43%)12 (57%)0.07
Lobulated n (%)6 (40%)9 (60%)0.04

Size (mm)Height4.1±2.15.2±2.30.22
Width3.6±2.14.4±1.80.14
Neck2.7±1.22.4±1.10.11

Angle(°)121±1885±210.04

Aspect ratio (height/Neck)1.2±0.21.7±0.30.02

Bottleneck factor (width/Neck)1.1±0.21.4±0.20.03

Mean ±SD; BMI – body mass index; BPmax – systolic blood pressure; BPmin – diastolic blood pressure; ΔP – pulse pressure; Dmax – systolic diameter; Dmin – diastolic diameter; IAs – intracranial aneurysms.

Figure 1

Brain CT of a 79 year-old woman with an unruptured intracranial aneurysm. (A) Transverse CT without contrast, (B) CT-angiography, (C) magnified image of aneurysm where H is size, W is dome width, N is neck width, and θ is angle. Calculations are H/N (aspect ratio) and W/N (bottleneck factor).

Figure 2

Brain CT of a 41 year-old male with a ruptured intracranial aneurysm with associated SAH. (A) Transverse CT image without contrast, (B) CT-angiography, and (C) aneurysm morphology assessment. Where H is size, W is dome width, N is neck width, and è is angle.

The unruptured IA group exhibited a decreased mean CCA intima-media thickness at 0.52±0.12 cm vs. 0.61±0.13 cm for the ruptured IA group (p=0.013). However, the unruptured IA group exhibited increased mean CCA lumen diameter change (ΔD) at 0.7±0.1 cm as compared to 0.5±0.1 cm for the ruptured IA group (p=0.04) (Figures 3 and 4). Mean CCA stiffness index was greater for the ruptured IA group at 6.0±0.5 vs. 6.7±0.5 for the IA group (p=0.044). This was also true for the mean CCA elastic modulus, as this measure was higher for the ruptured IA group at 0.9±0.3 compared to the IA group at 0.7±0.2 (p=0.026). Mean CCA strain was decreased for the ruptured IA group at 6.1±1.7 vs. 8.1±1.9 for the IA group (p=0.013). This same trend was observed for mean CCA distensibility, as the ruptured IA group mean value was lower at 1.8±0.4 than the IA group at 2.3±0.5 (p=0.024). Table 2 illustrates a comparison of all these calculated mean values between groups.
Figure 3

Ultrasound imaging of the right CCA for same patient as in Figure 1. (A) M-mode, (B) Doppler, and (C) ultrasound images of the CCA. The large parallel white lines are the CCA wall, which moves as the heart beats. The black area between the large parallel lines represents the CCA lumen. Lumen diameter is indicated with the double-headed arrow. The dashed lines highlight the intima-media junction, and the small double-headed arrow (see inset) indicates the intima-media thickness.

Figure 4

Ultrasound imaging of the right CCA from the same patient in Figure 3. (A) M-mode, (B) Doppler, and (C) ultrasound images of the CCA. Lumen diameter is indicated with the double-headed arrows. The dashed lines highlight the intima-media junction, and the small double-headed arrow (inset) indicates the intima-media thickness.

Table 2

Right CCA elastic properties comparison.

Unruptured IAs (n=23)Ruptured IAs (n=26)p-value
IMT (mm)0.52±0.120.61±0.130.013
Dmax (mm)6.9±0.47.1±0.30.14
Dmin (mm)6.2±0.36.6±0.20.08
ΔD (mm)0.7±0.10.5±0.10.04
BPmax (mmHg)117±6134±80.08
BPmin (mmHg)72±583±80.09
ΔP (mmHg)45±451±50.07
Strain (%)8.1±1.96.1±1.70.013
Distension (×10−6 cm2/dyne)2.3±0.51.8±0.40.024
Stiffness index6.0±0.56.7±0.40.044
Elastic modulus (×10−6 cm2/dyne)0.7±0.20.9±0.30.026

IAs – Intracranial aneurysms.

Discussion

The risk of rupture per year for patients with asymptomatic IAs has been reported at 0.05% [8]. In population-based studies, the prevalence of IAs ranged widely, from 0.2% to 10% [2,10]. As such, much research has been devoted to studying IAs and the factors that facilitate rupture. Reduced arterial elasticity was observed in patients with ruptured IAs in a recent ex vivo study [11]. The relationship between arterial wall distensibility and stress is still a matter of debate [29,30]. Patients with IA rupture exhibit decreased arterial wall distensibility compared to those with unruptured IAs [11,25]. This phenomenon is widely accepted, even though one ex vivo study asserted the opposite upon measuring arterial wall distensibility in the anterior cerebral, radial, and dorsalis pedis arteries. Moreover, arterial distensibility measurements have been commonly performed on the CCA [29,31]. In agreement with most studies, it is preferred to perform investigations on arterial wall distensibility in vivo. Therefore, we designed an in vivo study using measurements from the right CCA, such that our outcomes might aid in advancing the clinical management of patients with unruptured IA. Numerous studies have been performed that focused on parameters predicting rupture, such as aneurysm location, size, shape, and angle [14-18]. IAs with an irregular shape and multilobular contours are associated with increased focal stress and distensibility [32,33]. Elliptical IAs are more prone to rupture than spherical IAs [34,35]. Decreased bottleneck and aspect ratios are also correlated with increased rupture risk [14,17]. However, once rupture has occurred, spherical aneurysms become more oval-shaped; thus, an aneurysm’s elliptical quality may not be distinctive of increased rupture risk [4]. A recent study based on biomechanical models of rupture reported that rupture risk is associated with increased aneurysm size [11]. The cutoff value for increased rupture risk was determined to be 10 mm; however, the vast majority of IAs reported in other studies range between 5 to 9 mm [8,36]. Because of the high prevalence of IAs less than 10 mm in diameter, it is important to use criteria other than size to determine rupture risk [33]. It has been postulated that rupture occurs in small-sized IAs if they rapidly expand [4]. However, surgical interventions are not indicated for small IAs, since the rupture risk is relatively low [10,37]. Recent studies have emphasized that the pathophysiology of IA rupture could be evaluated biophysically [7,28]. An experimental study focusing on biomechanical alterations between unruptured IAs and ruptured IAs showed that patients with greater arterial wall rigidity were more prone to IA rupture [11]. Rigidity can be determined by the elastic properties of the arterial wall tissue, and a reduction in elasticity significantly contributes to the pathobiology of IA rupture [19,25]. Rupture risk for abdominal aortic aneurysms has also been evaluated in several studies [28,38]. It has been widely reported that arterial distensibility with comorbid vasculopathy predisposes patients to abdominal aortic aneurysm formation, dissection, and rupture [39]. These studies asserted that aneurysmal rupture occurred when wall tension exceeded the strength limit of the artery wall [40]. Another study evaluating the aneurysmal expansion limit demonstrated a correlation between the extent of distensibility and rupture [41,42]. Increased arterial wall stiffness, loss of elasticity, and decreased perivascular support might be associated with vasculopathies resulting from aging, essential hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and vasculitis [23,31,43-45]. Intimal remodeling and arterial stiffness might be associated with defects in elastin, collagen, and extracellular matrix [41,46]. Specifically, defective collagen contributes to arterial wall weakness due to decreased wall distensibility, which facilitates IA rupture [11,40]. Deficiencies in elastin are also correlated to intimal hypertrophy [26,27,47]. Aneurysmal growth and rupture has been associated with TNF-mediated inflammation [19]. In fact, patients with IA rupture exhibit exaggerated intimal hypertrophy [25,46,48]. Hemodynamic studies also highlight parameters that modulate aneurysmal wall rigidity, growth, and rupture [35,36,40]. Diminished arterial wall elasticity has been associated with a large discrepancy between diastolic and systolic BP (ΔP), which contributes to increased arterial resistance [38,40,43,49]. This phenomenon of continuous, increased mechanical loading augments IA wall stress, which facilitates IA fatigue and rupture [5,45]. Our results were in accordance with these data, as a high ΔP was associated with IA rupture. Overall, our results are in parallel with most in vivo studies performed on the extracranial arteries. We found that patients with IA rupture exhibit impaired CCA elasticity, which is associated with hypertrophic remodeling not observed in unruptured IAs. Impaired distensibility might not be completely attributed to IA rupture, as vasculopathy may also contribute to IA rupture [12,20]. Our data suggest that decreased CCA elasticity and increased intima-media measurements might be associated with an increased likelihood of IA rupture, which may be helpful in decision-making for IA clinical management.

Limitations

The study sample size was small, lacked a healthy control group, and no long-term follow-up was performed. However, all study subjects ultimately received surgical or interventional treatment.

Conclusions and Future Perspectives

Our findings demonstrate that patients with ruptured IAs exhibit impaired CCA wall distensibility and increased intima-media thickness, which suggests hypertrophic remodeling. Thus, determining CCA distensibility and intima-media thickness might be useful in determining whether an IA may rupture in the future. To better determine whether CCA elastic properties predispose patients to IA rupture, a larger prospective study design might be more informative, as the development of rupture may be correlated with changes in these factors over time. It is our hope that developing a set of predictive parameters for IA rupture will guide clinical management so to prevent complications such as subarachnoid hemorrhage.
  49 in total

1.  Hypertrophic remodeling and increased arterial stiffness in patients with intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  David Maltete; Jeremy Bellien; Lucie Cabrejo; Michele Iacob; François Proust; Bruno Mihout; Christian Thuillez; Evelyne Guegan-Massardier; Robinson Joannides
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 5.162

2.  A balanced translocation truncates Neurotrimin in a family with intracranial and thoracic aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Tiia M Luukkonen; Minna Pöyhönen; Aarno Palotie; Pekka Ellonen; Sonja Lagström; Joseph H Lee; Joseph D Terwilliger; Riitta Salonen; Teppo Varilo
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for asymptomatic, unruptured intracranial aneurysms. A mathematical model.

Authors:  Y Yoshimoto; S Wakai
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Prevalence and risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review.

Authors:  G J Rinkel; M Djibuti; A Algra; J van Gijn
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Saccular aneurysm formation in curved and bifurcating arteries.

Authors:  G N Foutrakis; H Yonas; R J Sclabassi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Arterial distensibility in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  E R Greene; K R Lanphere; J Sharrar; C A Roldan
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2009

7.  Difference in configuration of ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms determined by biplanar digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  J Beck; S Rohde; M el Beltagy; M Zimmermann; J Berkefeld; V Seifert; A Raabe
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  Arterial stiffness, cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity and postural blood pressure changes in older adults: the Rotterdam Study.

Authors:  Francesco U S Mattace-Raso; Anton H van den Meiracker; Willem Jan Bos; Tischa J M van der Cammen; Berend E Westerhof; Suzette Elias-Smale; Robert S Reneman; Arnold P G Hoeks; Albert Hofman; Jacqueline C M Witteman
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.844

9.  Intracranial aneurysm risk locus 5q23.2 is associated with elevated systolic blood pressure.

Authors:  Emília Ilona Gaál; Perttu Salo; Kati Kristiansson; Karola Rehnström; Johannes Kettunen; Antti-Pekka Sarin; Mika Niemelä; Antti Jula; Olli T Raitakari; Terho Lehtimäki; Johan G Eriksson; Elisabeth Widen; Murat Günel; Mitja Kurki; Mikael von und Zu Fraunberg; Juha E Jääskeläinen; Juha Hernesniemi; Marjo-Riitta Järvelin; Anneli Pouta; Christopher Newton-Cheh; Veikko Salomaa; Aarno Palotie; Markus Perola
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Left atrium volume index is influenced by aortic stiffness and central pulse pressure in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: a hemodynamic and echocardiographic study.

Authors:  Tomasz Zapolski; Andrzej Wysokiński
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2013-03-04
View more
  4 in total

1.  Cerebral hemodynamics and intracranial aneurysms: Reflecting on pipeline embolization devices.

Authors:  Wesley K Lefferts; Kevin S Heffernan
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-07-22       Impact factor: 1.610

2.  Endovascular coil embolization of aneurysm neck for the treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysm with bleb formation.

Authors:  Jun Wan; Weijin Gu; Xiaolong Zhang; Daoying Geng; Gang Lu; Lei Huang; Lei Zhang; Liang Ge; Lihua Ji
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-07-02

3.  Quantitative Aortic Distensibility Measurement Using CT in Patients with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Reproducibility and Clinical Relevance.

Authors:  Yunfei Zha; Gongling Peng; Liang Li; Chunying Yang; Xuesong Lu; Zhoufeng Peng
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  The major cerebral arteries proximal to the Circle of Willis contribute to cerebrovascular resistance in humans.

Authors:  Esther A H Warnert; Emma C Hart; Judith E Hall; Kevin Murphy; Richard G Wise
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 6.200

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.