Literature DB >> 14577007

Difference in configuration of ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms determined by biplanar digital subtraction angiography.

J Beck1, S Rohde, M el Beltagy, M Zimmermann, J Berkefeld, V Seifert, A Raabe.   

Abstract

There is an ongoing discussion about the risk of bleeding from unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Management guidelines were developed recently and some of the recommendations for decision making are based on the anatomical configuration of the aneurysm. The common assumption is that the presence of multiple lobes or a daughter sac indicates a higher risk of rupture. We have investigated the anatomical configuration of ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms using biplanar digital subtraction angiography (DSA). The objective was to determine, whether there was a difference between ruptured and unruptured aneurysms regarding lobulation, the presence of a daughter sac or the shape as measured by the height/neck ratio. Biplanar DSA images of 124 patients were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 53 unruptured and 94 ruptured aneurysms were found (=147 aneurysms in total). Aneurysms of less than 10 mm diameter accounted for 82% of all aneurysms. Overall, 10% of unruptured aneurysm showed a multilobular appearance on DSA compared with 20% of ruptured aneurysms (Fisher's exact test, p=0.10). In the 5-9 mm aneurysm group, multiple lobes were found significantly more frequent in ruptured aneurysms (26% vs. 4%, Fisher's exact test, p<0.05). A height/neck ratio of less than 1.5 was not found in unruptured aneurysms (0/26) but in 21% (12/57) of ruptured aneurysms (p<0.05). Our data provide scientific support for using morphological features for the decision making process in the management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. An irregular multilobar appearance was significantly more common in aneurysms of 5-9 mm size that ruptured.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14577007     DOI: 10.1007/s00701-003-0124-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  33 in total

1.  Reduction of radiation dose for cerebral angiography using flat panel detector of direct conversion type: a vascular phantom study.

Authors:  Y Hatakeyama; S Kakeda; N Ohnari; J Moriya; N Oda; K Nishino; W Miyamoto; Y Korogi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Geometric Parameter Analysis of Ruptured and Unruptured Aneurysms in Patients with Symmetric Bilateral Intracranial Aneurysms: A Multicenter CT Angiography Study.

Authors:  Z-Q Huang; Z-H Meng; Z-J Hou; S-Q Huang; J-N Chen; H Yu; L-J Feng; Q-J Wang; P-A Li; Z-B Wen
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Intraobserver and interobserver variability in CT angiography and MR angiography measurements of the size of cerebral aneurysms.

Authors:  Hye Jeong Kim; Dae Young Yoon; Eun Soo Kim; Hyung Jin Lee; Hong Jun Jeon; Jong Young Lee; Byung-Moon Cho
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2017-03-25       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Fusion of subarachnoid hemorrhage data and computed tomography angiography data is helpful to identify the rupture source in patients with multiple intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Anhui Yao; Liyun Jia; Jun Li; Benhan Wang; Jiashu Zhang; Zhe Xue; Kai Zhao; Yue Zhao; Na You; Jun Zhang; Bainan Xu
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Fourier analysis of intracranial aneurysms: towards an objective and quantitative evaluation of the shape of aneurysms.

Authors:  Stefan Rohde; Katharina Lahmann; Jürgen Beck; Reinhold Nafe; Bernard Yan; Andreas Raabe; Joachim Berkefeld
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2005-02-02       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Rupture-associated changes of cerebral aneurysm geometry: high-resolution 3D imaging before and after rupture.

Authors:  J J Schneiders; H A Marquering; R van den Berg; E VanBavel; B Velthuis; G J E Rinkel; C B Majoie
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 7.  Suggested connections between risk factors of intracranial aneurysms: a review.

Authors:  Juan R Cebral; Marcelo Raschi
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Morphology parameters for intracranial aneurysm rupture risk assessment.

Authors:  Sujan Dhar; Markus Tremmel; J Mocco; Minsuok Kim; Junichi Yamamoto; Adnan H Siddiqui; L Nelson Hopkins; Hui Meng
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  Configuration of the circle of Willis, direction of flow, and shape of the aneurysm as risk factors for rupture of intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Nicolien K de Rooij; Birgitta K Velthuis; Ale Algra; Gabriël J E Rinkel
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2009-02-09       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Patient-specific flow analysis of brain aneurysms at a single location: comparison of hemodynamic characteristics in small aneurysms.

Authors:  Aichi Chien; Satoshi Tateshima; Marcelo Castro; James Sayre; Juan Cebral; Fernando Viñuela
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 2.602

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.