Leopoldo Raij1, Alba M Gonzalez-Ochoa. 1. Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Miami, Miami, Florida 33125-1624, USA. LRaij@med.miami.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Vascular stiffening is a hallmark of the aging process. Improvements in the methods used to measure central stiffness, particularly applanation tonometry, and their use as therapeutic targets have generated great interest. RECENT FINDINGS: Vascular stiffness is associated with increases in pulse pressure (PP), aortic augmentation index, and pulse wave velocity (PWV). This last has emerged as the gold standard for evaluation of vascular stiffness, as it is an independent predictor of coronary heart disease, stroke, and mortality. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), and calcium-channel blockers with or without diuretics are all commonly used to ameliorate vascular stiffness; however, selective β-1 blockers (β-blockers) may actually worsen aortic PP and aortic augmentation index. SUMMARY: Serial measurements of vascular stiffness, including PWV, augmentation index, and PP, may be especially beneficial in older patients to supplement brachial blood pressure. At present, given the lack of universally accepted normal values for vascular stiffness as measured by applanation tonometry, serial measurements over time may be more helpful than a single isolated value. In patients with suspected vascular stiffening, therapy should include inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system with ACE inhibitors or ARBs, calcium-channel blockers, and diuretics as needed to normalize blood pressure. β-Blockers should be reserved for patients with a history of myocardial infarction or congestive heart disease. It remains to be established whether β-blockers with vasodilator properties could improve the assessment of vascular compliance.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Vascular stiffening is a hallmark of the aging process. Improvements in the methods used to measure central stiffness, particularly applanation tonometry, and their use as therapeutic targets have generated great interest. RECENT FINDINGS: Vascular stiffness is associated with increases in pulse pressure (PP), aortic augmentation index, and pulse wave velocity (PWV). This last has emerged as the gold standard for evaluation of vascular stiffness, as it is an independent predictor of coronary heart disease, stroke, and mortality. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), and calcium-channel blockers with or without diuretics are all commonly used to ameliorate vascular stiffness; however, selective β-1 blockers (β-blockers) may actually worsen aortic PP and aortic augmentation index. SUMMARY: Serial measurements of vascular stiffness, including PWV, augmentation index, and PP, may be especially beneficial in older patients to supplement brachial blood pressure. At present, given the lack of universally accepted normal values for vascular stiffness as measured by applanation tonometry, serial measurements over time may be more helpful than a single isolated value. In patients with suspected vascular stiffening, therapy should include inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system with ACE inhibitors or ARBs, calcium-channel blockers, and diuretics as needed to normalize blood pressure. β-Blockers should be reserved for patients with a history of myocardial infarction or congestive heart disease. It remains to be established whether β-blockers with vasodilator properties could improve the assessment of vascular compliance.
Authors: Nancy L Sehgel; Yi Zhu; Zhe Sun; Jerome P Trzeciakowski; Zhongkui Hong; William C Hunter; Dorothy E Vatner; Gerald A Meininger; Stephen F Vatner Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2013-05-24 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Eric Tuday; Yohei Nomura; Deepa Ruhela; Mitsunori Nakano; Xiuping Fu; Aparna Shah; Barbara Roman; Atsushi Yamaguchi; Steven S An; Charles Steenbergen; Jay M Baraban; Dan E Berkowitz; Samarjit Das Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2019-10-18 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Eric Tuday; Mitsunori Nakano; Kei Akiyoshi; Xiuping Fu; Aparna P Shah; Atsushi Yamaguchi; Charles Steenbergen; Lakshmi Santhanam; Steven S An; Dan Berkowitz; Jay M Baraban; Samarjit Das Journal: Hypertension Date: 2021-07-26 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Michael Trapp; Eva-Maria Trapp; Josef W Egger; Wolfgang Domej; Giuseppe Schillaci; Alexander Avian; Peter M Rohrer; Nina Hörlesberger; Dieter Magometschnigg; Mila Cervar-Zivkovic; Peter Komericki; Rosemarie Velik; Johannes Baulmann Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-05-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Valentina Mercurio; Antonio Lobasso; Letizia Barbieri; Paolo Parrella; Deasy Ciervo; Bianca Liccardo; Domenico Bonaduce; Carlo G Tocchetti; Amato De Paulis; Francesca W Rossi Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2019-04-30 Impact factor: 5.923