PURPOSE: Controlled aliasing techniques for simultaneously acquired echo-planar imaging slices have been shown to significantly increase the temporal efficiency for both diffusion-weighted imaging and functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. The "slice-GRAPPA" (SG) method has been widely used to reconstruct such data. We investigate robust optimization techniques for SG to ensure image reconstruction accuracy through a reduction of leakage artifacts. METHODS: Split SG is proposed as an alternative kernel optimization method. The performance of Split SG is compared to standard SG using data collected on a spherical phantom and in vivo on two subjects at 3 T. Slice-accelerated and nonaccelerated data were collected for a spin-echo diffusion-weighted acquisition. Signal leakage metrics and time-series SNR were used to quantify the performance of the kernel fitting approaches. RESULTS: The Split SG optimization strategy significantly reduces leakage artifacts for both phantom and in vivo acquisitions. In addition, a significant boost in time-series SNR for in vivo diffusion-weighted acquisitions with in-plane 2× and slice 3× accelerations was observed with the Split SG approach. CONCLUSION: By minimizing the influence of leakage artifacts during the training of SG kernels, we have significantly improved reconstruction accuracy. Our robust kernel fitting strategy should enable better reconstruction accuracy and higher slice-acceleration across many applications.
PURPOSE: Controlled aliasing techniques for simultaneously acquired echo-planar imaging slices have been shown to significantly increase the temporal efficiency for both diffusion-weighted imaging and functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. The "slice-GRAPPA" (SG) method has been widely used to reconstruct such data. We investigate robust optimization techniques for SG to ensure image reconstruction accuracy through a reduction of leakage artifacts. METHODS: Split SG is proposed as an alternative kernel optimization method. The performance of Split SG is compared to standard SG using data collected on a spherical phantom and in vivo on two subjects at 3 T. Slice-accelerated and nonaccelerated data were collected for a spin-echo diffusion-weighted acquisition. Signal leakage metrics and time-series SNR were used to quantify the performance of the kernel fitting approaches. RESULTS: The Split SG optimization strategy significantly reduces leakage artifacts for both phantom and in vivo acquisitions. In addition, a significant boost in time-series SNR for in vivo diffusion-weighted acquisitions with in-plane 2× and slice 3× accelerations was observed with the Split SG approach. CONCLUSION: By minimizing the influence of leakage artifacts during the training of SG kernels, we have significantly improved reconstruction accuracy. Our robust kernel fitting strategy should enable better reconstruction accuracy and higher slice-acceleration across many applications.
Authors: Mark A Griswold; Peter M Jakob; Robin M Heidemann; Mathias Nittka; Vladimir Jellus; Jianmin Wang; Berthold Kiefer; Axel Haase Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: T Jaermann; G Crelier; K P Pruessmann; X Golay; T Netsch; A M C van Muiswinkel; S Mori; P C M van Zijl; A Valavanis; S Kollias; P Boesiger Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Felix A Breuer; Martin Blaimer; Robin M Heidemann; Matthias F Mueller; Mark A Griswold; Peter M Jakob Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Martin Blaimer; Felix A Breuer; Nicole Seiberlich; Matthias F Mueller; Robin M Heidemann; Vladimir Jellus; Graham Wiggins; Lawrence L Wald; Mark A Griswold; Peter M Jakob Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Steen Moeller; Essa Yacoub; Cheryl A Olman; Edward Auerbach; John Strupp; Noam Harel; Kâmil Uğurbil Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: David A Feinberg; Steen Moeller; Stephen M Smith; Edward Auerbach; Sudhir Ramanna; Matthias Gunther; Matt F Glasser; Karla L Miller; Kamil Ugurbil; Essa Yacoub Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-12-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kawin Setsompop; Qiuyun Fan; Jason Stockmann; Berkin Bilgic; Susie Huang; Stephen F Cauley; Aapo Nummenmaa; Fuyixue Wang; Yogesh Rathi; Thomas Witzel; Lawrence L Wald Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2017-03-05 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Kangrong Zhu; Robert F Dougherty; Hua Wu; Matthew J Middione; Atsushi M Takahashi; Tao Zhang; John M Pauly; Adam B Kerr Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2016-02-18 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Suhyung Park; Liyong Chen; Jennifer Townsend; Hyunyeol Lee; David A Feinberg Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2019-08-12 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Changyu Sun; Yang Yang; Xiaoying Cai; Michael Salerno; Craig H Meyer; Daniel Weller; Frederick H Epstein Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-09-30 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Cornelius Eichner; Kourosh Jafari-Khouzani; Stephen Cauley; Himanshu Bhat; Pavlina Polaskova; Ovidiu C Andronesi; Otto Rapalino; Robert Turner; Lawrence L Wald; Steven Stufflebeam; Kawin Setsompop Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2013-10-28 Impact factor: 4.668