Literature DB >> 23963741

EFSA's scientific activities and achievements on the risk assessment of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) during its first decade of existence: looking back and ahead.

Yann Devos1, Jaime Aguilera, Zoltán Diveki, Ana Gomes, Yi Liu, Claudia Paoletti, Patrick du Jardin, Lieve Herman, Joe N Perry, Elisabeth Waigmann.   

Abstract

Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and derived food and feed products are subject to a risk analysis and regulatory approval before they can enter the market in the European Union (EU). In this risk analysis process, the role of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), which was created in 2002 in response to multiple food crises, is to independently assess and provide scientific advice to risk managers on any possible risks that the use of GMOs may pose to human and animal health and the environment. EFSA's scientific advice is elaborated by its GMO Panel with the scientific support of several working groups and EFSA's GMO Unit. This review presents EFSA's scientific activities and highlights its achievements on the risk assessment of GMOs for the first 10 years of its existence. Since 2002, EFSA has issued 69 scientific opinions on genetically modified (GM) plant market registration applications, of which 62 for import and processing for food and feed uses, six for cultivation and one for the use of pollen (as or in food), and 19 scientific opinions on applications for marketing products made with GM microorganisms. Several guidelines for the risk assessment of GM plants, GM microorganisms and GM animals, as well as on specific issues such as post-market environmental monitoring (PMEM) were elaborated. EFSA also provided scientific advice upon request of the European Commission on safeguard clause and emergency measures invoked by EU Member States, annual PMEM reports, the potential risks of new biotechnology-based plant breeding techniques, evaluations of previously assessed GMOs in the light of new scientific publications, and the use of antibiotic resistance marker genes in GM plants. Future challenges relevant to the risk assessment of GMOs are discussed. EFSA's risk assessments of GMO applications ensure that data are analysed and presented in a way that facilitates scientifically sound decisions that protect human and animal health and the environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23963741     DOI: 10.1007/s11248-013-9741-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transgenic Res        ISSN: 0962-8819            Impact factor:   2.788


  58 in total

1.  A conceptual framework for the design of environmental post-market monitoring of genetically modified plants.

Authors:  Olivier Sanvido; Franco Widmer; Michael Winzeler; Franz Bigler
Journal:  Environ Biosafety Res       Date:  2005 Jan-Mar

2.  Endogenous allergens and compositional analysis in the allergenicity assessment of genetically modified plants.

Authors:  A Fernandez; E N C Mills; M Lovik; A Spoek; A Germini; A Mikalsen; J M Wal
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 6.023

3.  Statistical aspects of environmental risk assessment of GM plants for effects on non-target organisms.

Authors:  Joe N Perry; Cajo J F Ter Braak; Philip M Dixon; Jian J Duan; Rosie S Hails; Alexandra Huesken; Marc Lavielle; Michelle Marvier; Michele Scardi; Kerstin Schmidt; Bela Tothmeresz; Frank Schaarschmidt; Hilko van der Voet
Journal:  Environ Biosafety Res       Date:  2009-10-16

Review 4.  Horizontal gene transfer from transgenic plants to terrestrial bacteria--a rare event?

Authors:  K M Nielsen; A M Bones; K Smalla; J D van Elsas
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 16.408

5.  Transgenic or not? No simple answer! New biotechnology-based plant breeding techniques and the regulatory landscape.

Authors:  Nancy Podevin; Yann Devos; Howard Vivian Davies; Kaare Magne Nielsen
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 8.807

6.  Validation of RNA interference in western corn rootworm Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) adults.

Authors:  Murugesan Rangasamy; Blair D Siegfried
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.845

Review 7.  ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering.

Authors:  Thomas Gaj; Charles A Gersbach; Carlos F Barbas
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 19.536

Review 8.  Biosafety and risk assessment framework for selectable marker genes in transgenic crop plants: a case of the science not supporting the politics.

Authors:  Koreen Ramessar; Ariadna Peremarti; Sonia Gómez-Galera; Shaista Naqvi; Marian Moralejo; Pilar Muñoz; Teresa Capell; Paul Christou
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2007-04-14       Impact factor: 3.145

9.  A mathematical model of exposure of non-target Lepidoptera to Bt-maize pollen expressing Cry1Ab within Europe.

Authors:  J N Perry; Y Devos; S Arpaia; D Bartsch; A Gathmann; R S Hails; J Kiss; K Lheureux; B Manachini; S Mestdagh; G Neemann; F Ortego; J Schiemann; J B Sweet
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 10.  Microalgal biofactories: a promising approach towards sustainable omega-3 fatty acid production.

Authors:  T Catalina Adarme-Vega; David K Y Lim; Matthew Timmins; Felicitas Vernen; Yan Li; Peer M Schenk
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 5.328

View more
  18 in total

1.  A 90-day subchronic feeding study of genetically modified rice expressing Cry1Ab protein in Sprague-Dawley rats.

Authors:  Huan Song; Xiaoyun He; Shiying Zou; Teng Zhang; Yunbo Luo; Kunlun Huang; Zhen Zhu; Wentao Xu
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  Towards a more open debate about values in decision-making on agricultural biotechnology.

Authors:  Yann Devos; Olivier Sanvido; Joyce Tait; Alan Raybould
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 3.  New GMO regulations for old: Determining a new future for EU crop biotechnology.

Authors:  John Davison; Klaus Ammann
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 3.074

4.  Potential use of an arthropod database to support the non-target risk assessment and monitoring of transgenic plants.

Authors:  Jörg Romeis; Michael Meissle; Fernando Alvarez-Alfageme; Franz Bigler; David A Bohan; Yann Devos; Louise A Malone; Xavier Pons; Stefan Rauschen
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2014-03-16       Impact factor: 2.788

5.  Protection goals in environmental risk assessment: a practical approach.

Authors:  Monica Garcia-Alonso; Alan Raybould
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 6.  Dietary and Policy Priorities for Cardiovascular Disease, Diabetes, and Obesity: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Dariush Mozaffarian
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Enabling nutrient security and sustainability through systems research.

Authors:  Jim Kaput; Martin Kussmann; Yery Mendoza; Ronit Le Coutre; Karen Cooper; Anne Roulin
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 5.523

8.  Can Systematic Reviews Inform GMO Risk Assessment and Risk Management?

Authors:  Christian Kohl; Geoff Frampton; Jeremy Sweet; Armin Spök; Neal Robert Haddaway; Ralf Wilhelm; Stefan Unger; Joachim Schiemann
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2015-08-12

Review 9.  The end of a myth-Bt (Cry1Ab) maize does not harm green lacewings.

Authors:  Jörg Romeis; Michael Meissle; Steven E Naranjo; Yunhe Li; Franz Bigler
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  The Solanum demissum R8 late blight resistance gene is an Sw-5 homologue that has been deployed worldwide in late blight resistant varieties.

Authors:  Jack H Vossen; Gert van Arkel; Marjan Bergervoet; Kwang-Ryong Jo; Evert Jacobsen; Richard G F Visser
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 5.699

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.