Literature DB >> 23963658

Estimation of the size of drug-like chemical space based on GDB-17 data.

P G Polishchuk1, T I Madzhidov, A Varnek.   

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to estimate the number of realistic drug-like molecules which could ever be synthesized. Unlike previous studies based on exhaustive enumeration of molecular graphs or on combinatorial enumeration preselected fragments, we used results of constrained graphs enumeration by Reymond to establish a correlation between the number of generated structures (M) and the number of heavy atoms (N): logM = 0.584 × N × logN + 0.356. The number of atoms limiting drug-like chemical space of molecules which follow Lipinsky's rules (N = 36) has been obtained from the analysis of the PubChem database. This results in M ≈ 10³³ which is in between the numbers estimated by Ertl (10²³) and by Bohacek (10⁶⁰).

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23963658     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-013-9672-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  13 in total

1.  Diversity screening versus focussed screening in drug discovery.

Authors: 
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 7.851

Review 2.  Combinatorial compound libraries for drug discovery: an ongoing challenge.

Authors:  H Mario Geysen; Frank Schoenen; David Wagner; Richard Wagner
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 84.694

3.  Size estimation of chemical space: how big is it?

Authors:  Kurt L M Drew; Hakim Baiman; Prashanna Khwaounjoo; Bo Yu; Jóhannes Reynisson
Journal:  J Pharm Pharmacol       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 3.765

4.  Exploring neurotherapeutic space: how many neurological drugs exist (or could exist)?

Authors:  Donald F Weaver; Colin A Weaver
Journal:  J Pharm Pharmacol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.765

5.  Virtual exploration of the small-molecule chemical universe below 160 Daltons.

Authors:  Tobias Fink; Heinz Bruggesser; Jean-Louis Reymond
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2005-02-25       Impact factor: 15.336

Review 6.  Diversity in medicinal chemistry space.

Authors:  Alain-Dominique Gorse
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Chemical space travel.

Authors:  Ruud van Deursen; Jean-Louis Reymond
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.466

Review 8.  The art and practice of structure-based drug design: a molecular modeling perspective.

Authors:  R S Bohacek; C McMartin; W C Guida
Journal:  Med Res Rev       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 12.944

9.  Drug discovery: nature's pieces.

Authors:  Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 24.427

10.  Enumeration of 166 billion organic small molecules in the chemical universe database GDB-17.

Authors:  Lars Ruddigkeit; Ruud van Deursen; Lorenz C Blum; Jean-Louis Reymond
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 4.956

View more
  59 in total

1.  Chemical libraries: How dark is HTS dark matter?

Authors:  Ricardo Macarron
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 15.040

2.  Mappability of drug-like space: towards a polypharmacologically competent map of drug-relevant compounds.

Authors:  Pavel Sidorov; Helena Gaspar; Gilles Marcou; Alexandre Varnek; Dragos Horvath
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Structure-Based Screening of Uncharted Chemical Space for Atypical Adenosine Receptor Agonists.

Authors:  David Rodríguez; Saibal Chakraborty; Eugene Warnick; Steven Crane; Zhan-Guo Gao; Robert O'Connor; Kenneth A Jacobson; Jens Carlsson
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 5.100

4.  Using attribution to decode binding mechanism in neural network models for chemistry.

Authors:  Kevin McCloskey; Ankur Taly; Federico Monti; Michael P Brenner; Lucy J Colwell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Free Energy Calculations for Protein-Ligand Binding Prediction.

Authors:  Willem Jespers; Johan Åqvist; Hugo Gutiérrez-de-Terán
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

Review 6.  Generative chemistry: drug discovery with deep learning generative models.

Authors:  Yuemin Bian; Xiang-Qun Xie
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 1.810

7.  Design of efficient molecular organic light-emitting diodes by a high-throughput virtual screening and experimental approach.

Authors:  Rafael Gómez-Bombarelli; Jorge Aguilera-Iparraguirre; Timothy D Hirzel; David Duvenaud; Dougal Maclaurin; Martin A Blood-Forsythe; Hyun Sik Chae; Markus Einzinger; Dong-Gwang Ha; Tony Wu; Georgios Markopoulos; Soonok Jeon; Hosuk Kang; Hiroshi Miyazaki; Masaki Numata; Sunghan Kim; Wenliang Huang; Seong Ik Hong; Marc Baldo; Ryan P Adams; Alán Aspuru-Guzik
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 43.841

8.  Consensus queries in ligand-based virtual screening experiments.

Authors:  Francois Berenger; Oanh Vu; Jens Meiler
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 5.514

9.  Molpher: a software framework for systematic chemical space exploration.

Authors:  David Hoksza; Petr Skoda; Milan Voršilák; Daniel Svozil
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 5.514

10.  Protein structure prediction provides comparable performance to crystallographic structures in docking-based virtual screening.

Authors:  Hongying Du; Jeffrey R Brender; Jian Zhang; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 3.608

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.