Literature DB >> 23960477

The applicability of a non-anatomical soft and hard tissue centroid line (S&H centroid) in cephalometrics.

Ibrahim S Al-Shahrani1, Khalid M Al-Balkhi, Abdulaziz Al-Madi.   

Abstract

The applicability of a newly introduced non-anatomical soft and hard tissue cephalometric centroid line (S&H centroid) was investigated. The "S&H centroid" line established from 12″ × 14″ lateral cephalometric radiographs of 57 selected adults was used as a base to create a new cephalometric reference line "Centroid-Nasion". The reliability and the use of the newly created "Centroid-Nasion" as a reference line was tested against the conventional "Sella-Nasion" cephalometric reference line to evaluate the sagittal and vertical maxillary and mandibular relationship. Pearson's correlation coefficient, one way ANOVA, and Tukey multiple comparison post Hoc statistical tests were used. The digitization technique was reliable. The "Centroid-Nasion" cephalometric reference line created by utilizing the "S&H centroid" line, was found to be as useful as the conventional "Sella-Nasion" cephalometric plane in establishing and differentiating between sagittal and vertical intermaxillary relationships.

Keywords:  Centroid; Cephalometric; Hard tissue; Line; Non-anatomical; Soft tissue

Year:  2010        PMID: 23960477      PMCID: PMC3723278          DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2010.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Saudi Dent J        ISSN: 1013-9052


  13 in total

1.  An evaluation of the reproducibility of landmark identification using scanned cephalometric images.

Authors:  P J Turner; S Weerakone
Journal:  J Orthod       Date:  2001-09

2.  Centrographic analysis of 1-phase versus 2-phase treatment for Class II malocclusion.

Authors:  Calogero Dolce; Randolph E Schader; Susan P McGorray; Timothy T Wheeler
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Centroid analysis of twin-block appliance treatment for Class II Division 1 malocclusion.

Authors:  Michael J Trenouth
Journal:  World J Orthod       Date:  2006

4.  An evaluation of the errors in cephalometric measurements on scanned cephalometric images and conventional tracings.

Authors:  Korkmaz Sayinsu; Fulya Isik; Göksu Trakyali; Tülin Arun
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Comparison of hand-traced and computerized cephalograms: landmark identification, measurement, and superimposition accuracy.

Authors:  Dustin Roden-Johnson; Jeryl English; Ronald Gallerano
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 6.  Individualized evaluation of facial form.

Authors:  L S Fishman
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  A new approach to cephalometric analysis of the dental base relationship.

Authors:  J S Johnson
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Rotational effects of S-N on the dentoskeletal pattern within the range of normal.

Authors:  O A Sarhan
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Variation of anatomical and centroid points in the human fetal skull.

Authors:  M Trenouth
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  An introduction to centroid cephalometrics.

Authors:  J S Johnson; R J Hubbold
Journal:  Br J Orthod       Date:  1982-01
View more
  1 in total

1.  Tau Angle: A New Approach for Assessment of True Sagittal Maxillomandibular Relationship.

Authors:  Prateek Gupta; Navneet Singh; Tulika Tripathi; Ram Gopal; Priyank Rai
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2020 Sep-Oct
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.