Literature DB >> 16102404

Centrographic analysis of 1-phase versus 2-phase treatment for Class II malocclusion.

Calogero Dolce1, Randolph E Schader, Susan P McGorray, Timothy T Wheeler.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Cephalometric analyses have been used by orthodontists to track growth and monitor treatment effects. Most of these analyses have normative values to which patients are compared, but some "normal" patients vary quite a bit from the normative values. The centrographic analysis is a visual analysis with no angles to measure or normative values to compare. After a reference plane is developed, the relative position of variable landmarks can be seen.
METHODS: We used the centroid centrographic analysis to study the effects of 1-phase and 2-phase orthodontic treatment. Phase 1 treatment consisted of bionator (n = 66), headgear/biteplane (n = 69), or observation (n = 65) until a Class I molar relationship was achieved or 2 years had elapsed. After 1 year, all subjects underwent full orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances.
RESULTS: Centrographic analysis showed that early treatment has effects on the mandible. However, the differences were not apparent by the end of fixed appliance treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: The skeletal effects of phase 1 treatment disappear by the end of fixed appliance treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16102404     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.04.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  5 in total

1.  The applicability of a non-anatomical soft and hard tissue centroid line (S&H centroid) in cephalometrics.

Authors:  Ibrahim S Al-Shahrani; Khalid M Al-Balkhi; Abdulaziz Al-Madi
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2010-02-06

2.  Very early orthodontic treatment: when, why and how?

Authors:  Ute E M Schneider-Moser; Lorenz Moser
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2022-06-10

Review 3.  One Phase versus Two Phase Treatment in Mixed Dentition: A Critical Review.

Authors:  M Suresh; Akurathi Ratnaditya; Vivekanand S Kattimani; Shameem Karpe
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2015-08

4.  Class II malocclusion occlusal severity description.

Authors:  Guilherme Janson; Renata Sathler; Thais Maria Freire Fernandes; Marcelo Zanda; Arnaldo Pinzan
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.698

5.  Volumetric changes in pharyngeal airway in Class II division 1 patients treated with Forsus-fixed functional appliance: A three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography study.

Authors:  Parul Temani; Pradeep Jain; Pooja Rathee; Ruchira Temani
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.