OBJECTIVE: Caregivers of adolescents and young adults (AYA) with complex medical conditions, including brain tumor survivors, have protracted and often complex roles, yet a gap exists in understanding their perceived competence. The aim of this study is to test a hypothesized model based on the theoretical and empirical literature: better caregiver health, better survivor health, and better family functioning contribute directly to fewer caregiving demands, which in turn contribute to greater caregiver competence. METHOD: Telephone interviews using structured self-report questionnaires were conducted in this cross-sectional study with a sample of 186 caregivers (mothers) of childhood brain tumor survivors aged 14-40 years old who live with at least one parent. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to test the hypothesized model. RESULTS: The final SEM model suggests that survivor health and family functioning directly predict caregiver competence. Caregiver health indirectly predicts caregiver competence through caregiver demands and then family functioning. Family income directly predicts family functioning. The model showed adequate fit (CFI = 0.905, TFI = 0.880, and RMSEA = 0.081). Overall, the model accounted for 45% of variance in caregiver competence. CONCLUSIONS: For this sample of caregivers of AYA with medically complex conditions, family functioning and the health of survivors are both important to how they evaluate their skills as caregivers. The results of this study underscore the crucial role of care models that focus on optimizing the health of the survivor, caregiver, and family, along with supporting a family centered approach to their care.
OBJECTIVE: Caregivers of adolescents and young adults (AYA) with complex medical conditions, including brain tumor survivors, have protracted and often complex roles, yet a gap exists in understanding their perceived competence. The aim of this study is to test a hypothesized model based on the theoretical and empirical literature: better caregiver health, better survivor health, and better family functioning contribute directly to fewer caregiving demands, which in turn contribute to greater caregiver competence. METHOD: Telephone interviews using structured self-report questionnaires were conducted in this cross-sectional study with a sample of 186 caregivers (mothers) of childhood brain tumor survivors aged 14-40 years old who live with at least one parent. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to test the hypothesized model. RESULTS: The final SEM model suggests that survivor health and family functioning directly predict caregiver competence. Caregiver health indirectly predicts caregiver competence through caregiver demands and then family functioning. Family income directly predicts family functioning. The model showed adequate fit (CFI = 0.905, TFI = 0.880, and RMSEA = 0.081). Overall, the model accounted for 45% of variance in caregiver competence. CONCLUSIONS: For this sample of caregivers of AYA with medically complex conditions, family functioning and the health of survivors are both important to how they evaluate their skills as caregivers. The results of this study underscore the crucial role of care models that focus on optimizing the health of the survivor, caregiver, and family, along with supporting a family centered approach to their care.
Authors: Paula R Sherwood; Barbara A Given; Charles W Given; Rachel F Schiffman; Daniel L Murman; Alexander von Eye; Mary Lovely; Lisa R Rogers; Sandy Remer Journal: J Nurs Scholarsh Date: 2007 Impact factor: 3.176
Authors: Kristina K Hardy; Melanie J Bonner; Rachel Masi; Katherine C Hutchinson; Victoria W Willard; Philip M Rosoff Journal: J Pediatr Hematol Oncol Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 1.289
Authors: Branlyn E Werba; Wendy Hobbie; Anne E Kazak; Richard F Ittenbach; Anne F Reilly; Anna T Meadows Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2007-06-15 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Kevin C Oeffinger; Ann C Mertens; Charles A Sklar; Toana Kawashima; Melissa M Hudson; Anna T Meadows; Debra L Friedman; Neyssa Marina; Wendy Hobbie; Nina S Kadan-Lottick; Cindy L Schwartz; Wendy Leisenring; Leslie L Robison Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-10-12 Impact factor: 176.079
Authors: Anne Klassen; Parminder Raina; Samantha Reineking; David Dix; Sheila Pritchard; Maureen O'Donnell Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 3.359
Authors: Matthew C Hocking; Wendy L Hobbie; Janet A Deatrick; Thomas L Hardie; Lamia P Barakat Journal: J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 2.223
Authors: Lamia P Barakat; Yimei Li; Wendy L Hobbie; Sue K Ogle; Thomas Hardie; Ellen M Volpe; Margo M Szabo; Maureen Reilly; Janet A Deatrick Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2014-08-11 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Nicole SanGiacomo; Jennifer Toth; Wendy Hobbie; Elizabeth Broden; Elizabeth Ver Hoeve; Kathleen A Knafl; Lamia Barakat; Sue Ogle; Janet A Deatrick Journal: J Pediatr Oncol Nurs Date: 2019-05-03 Impact factor: 1.636
Authors: David K Buchbinder; Michelle A Fortier; Kathryn Osann; Justin Wilford; Violet Shen; Lilibeth Torno; Leonard S Sender; Susan K Parsons; Lari Wenzel Journal: J Pediatr Hematol Oncol Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 1.289
Authors: Matthew S Lucas; Bridgette M Brawner; Thomas L Hardie; Barbara Beacham; Cynthia Paidipati; Magdaline Diaz; Amy Lauer; Wendy L Hobbie; Janet A Deatrick Journal: Oncol Nurs Forum Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 2.172
Authors: Janet A Deatrick; Lamia P Barakat; George J Knafl; Wendy Hobbie; Sue Ogle; Jill P Ginsberg; Michael J Fisher; Thomas Hardie; Maureen Reilly; Elizabeth Broden; Jennifer Toth; Nicole SanGiacomo; Kathleen A Knafl Journal: J Fam Psychol Date: 2018-04