Literature DB >> 28887756

Development of the Pediatric Neuro-Oncology Rating of Treatment Intensity (PNORTI).

Matthew C Hocking1,2, Wendy Hobbie3, Michael J Fisher3,4.   

Abstract

Measures of treatment intensity for childhood cancer are needed in research in order to control for variability in treatments. Existing measures of treatment intensity for childhood cancers do not reflect the complexities of treatment protocols for central nervous system (CNS) tumors. This paper describes the development of the Pediatric Neuro-Oncology Rating of Treatment Intensity (PNORTI). PNORTI development occurred in three phases. Phase 1: five experts in pediatric neuro-oncology created a 5-point scale of treatment intensity and 42 pediatric neuro-oncology providers completed a three-part online questionnaire to evaluate the classification system and apply the rating system to 16 sample patients. Validity was determined by respondents classifying therapy modalities into intensity levels. Inter-rater reliability was calculated from ratings of the 16 sample patients. Phase 2: three experts revised the PNORTI based on survey results and 18 pediatric neuro-oncology providers evaluated the classification system. Phase 3: ten experts in pediatric neuro-oncology refined and finalized the PNORTI and rated 10 sample patients using the PNORTI. Agreement between median ratings of the survey respondents and criterion raters for chemotherapy intensity (r's = .82 and 1.0) and overall treatment intensity level (r's = .91 and .94) were high in Phases 1 and 2. Inter-rater reliability also was very high when using the PNORTI to classify the 16 sample patients in Phase 1 (median agreement of r = .93 and rICC = .99) and the 10 sample patients in Phase 3 (median agreement of r = .92 and rICC = .98). The PNORTI is a valid and reliable method for classifying the intensity of different treatment modalities used in pediatric neuro-oncology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain tumor; Pediatric neuro-oncology; Treatment intensity

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28887756      PMCID: PMC6362451          DOI: 10.1007/s11060-017-2618-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  14 in total

1.  Medical and psychosocial associates of nonadherence in adolescents with cancer.

Authors:  Stephanie E Hullmann; Lauren D Brumley; Lisa A Schwartz
Journal:  J Pediatr Oncol Nurs       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 1.636

2.  CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2008-2012.

Authors:  Quinn T Ostrom; Haley Gittleman; Jordonna Fulop; Max Liu; Rachel Blanda; Courtney Kromer; Yingli Wolinsky; Carol Kruchko; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 12.300

3.  Discrepancies among Measures of Executive Functioning in a Subsample of Young Adult Survivors of Childhood Brain Tumor: Associations with Treatment Intensity.

Authors:  Mark D McCurdy; Elise M Turner; Lamia P Barakat; Wendy L Hobbie; Janet A Deatrick; Iris Paltin; Michael J Fisher; Matthew C Hocking
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 2.892

4.  Prospectively examining physical activity in young adult survivors of childhood cancer and healthy controls.

Authors:  Matthew C Hocking; Lisa A Schwartz; Wendy L Hobbie; Branlyn Werba Derosa; Richard F Ittenbach; Jun J Mao; Jill P Ginsberg; Anne E Kazak
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 3.167

5.  A revision of the intensity of treatment rating scale: classifying the intensity of pediatric cancer treatment.

Authors:  Anne E Kazak; Matthew C Hocking; Richard F Ittenbach; Anna T Meadows; Wendy Hobbie; Branlyn Werba DeRosa; Ann Leahey; Leslie Kersun; Anne Reilly
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 6.  Factors Affecting Health-Related Quality of Life in Children Undergoing Curative Treatment for Cancer: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Tha'er G Momani; Donna K Hathaway; Belinda N Mandrell
Journal:  J Pediatr Oncol Nurs       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 1.636

7.  Fatigue in adolescents with cancer compared to healthy adolescents.

Authors:  Lauren C Daniel; Lauren D Brumley; Lisa A Schwartz
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 3.167

8.  Prospective study of health-related quality of life for children with brain tumors treated with proton radiotherapy.

Authors:  Karen A Kuhlthau; Margaret B Pulsifer; Beow Y Yeap; Dianali Rivera Morales; Jennifer Delahaye; Kristen S Hill; David Ebb; Annah N Abrams; Shannon M Macdonald; Nancy J Tarbell; Torunn I Yock
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Classifying the intensity of pediatric cancer treatment protocols: the intensity of treatment rating scale 2.0 (ITR-2).

Authors:  Branlyn E Werba; Wendy Hobbie; Anne E Kazak; Richard F Ittenbach; Anne F Reilly; Anna T Meadows
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 3.167

10.  Quantifying pediatric neuro-oncology risk factors: development of the neurological predictor scale.

Authors:  Jackie L Micklewright; Tricia Z King; Robin D Morris; Nicolas Krawiecki
Journal:  J Child Neurol       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 1.987

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.