PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To describe the development and feasibility of a protocol for nonpsychiatric subspecialty research staff members to screen research participants who endorse suicidal ideations or behaviors during data collection . DESIGN: Descriptive protocol development. . SETTING: The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and the University of Pennsylvania. . SAMPLE: 186 mother caregivers and 134 adolescent or young adult survivors of childhood brain tumors, with the protocol implemented for 5 caregivers and 11 survivors. METHODS: During telephone- and home-based interviews, the interviewer assessed the participant using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS). MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Expressed suicidal ideation or behavior . FINDINGS: Implementation of the C-SSRS by nonpsychiatric subspecialty staff members was feasible and valid. Interviewers' conclusions based on this instrument matched those of the mental health professional who followed up with participants. Process notes contained themes about the participants, including anger and sadness in survivors and the physical and emotional demands of the survivor in caregivers. Progress notes for the interviewer included a reiteration of events, whether the assessment was successful, and whether the recommendation of the interviewer was in agreement with that of the mental health professional . CONCLUSIONS: The protocol based on the C-SSRS was useful and feasible for nonpsychiatric subspecialty staff members to use in the collection of data from survivors of childhood brain tumors and their caregivers. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Survivors of childhood brain tumors and their caregivers may experience psychosocial distress. Nurses, as research assistants or in other roles, can use tools such as the C-SSRS to assist in front-line assessments. .
PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To describe the development and feasibility of a protocol for nonpsychiatric subspecialty research staff members to screen research participants who endorse suicidal ideations or behaviors during data collection . DESIGN: Descriptive protocol development. . SETTING: The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and the University of Pennsylvania. . SAMPLE: 186 mother caregivers and 134 adolescent or young adult survivors of childhood brain tumors, with the protocol implemented for 5 caregivers and 11 survivors. METHODS: During telephone- and home-based interviews, the interviewer assessed the participant using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS). MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Expressed suicidal ideation or behavior . FINDINGS: Implementation of the C-SSRS by nonpsychiatric subspecialty staff members was feasible and valid. Interviewers' conclusions based on this instrument matched those of the mental health professional who followed up with participants. Process notes contained themes about the participants, including anger and sadness in survivors and the physical and emotional demands of the survivor in caregivers. Progress notes for the interviewer included a reiteration of events, whether the assessment was successful, and whether the recommendation of the interviewer was in agreement with that of the mental health professional . CONCLUSIONS: The protocol based on the C-SSRS was useful and feasible for nonpsychiatric subspecialty staff members to use in the collection of data from survivors of childhood brain tumors and their caregivers. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Survivors of childhood brain tumors and their caregivers may experience psychosocial distress. Nurses, as research assistants or in other roles, can use tools such as the C-SSRS to assist in front-line assessments. .
Authors: Kathy N Speechley; Maru Barrera; Amanda K Shaw; Howard I Morrison; Elizabeth Maunsell Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-06-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Tara M Brinkman; Cori C Liptak; Brian L Delaney; Christine A Chordas; Anna C Muriel; Peter E Manley Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2013-04-27 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Kirsten K Ness; E Brannon Morris; Vikki G Nolan; Carrie R Howell; Laura S Gilchrist; Marilyn Stovall; Cheryl L Cox; James L Klosky; Amar Gajjar; Joseph P Neglia Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-06-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Roger E Meyer; Carl Salzman; Eric A Youngstrom; Paula J Clayton; Frederick K Goodwin; J John Mann; Larry D Alphs; Karl Broich; Wayne K Goodman; John F Greden; Herbert Y Meltzer; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Kelly Posner; David Shaffer; Maria A Oquendo; Barbara Stanley; Madhukar H Trivedi; Gustavo Turecki; Charles M Beasley; Annette L Beautrais; Jeffrey A Bridge; Gregory K Brown; Dennis A Revicki; Neal D Ryan; David V Sheehan Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Clara Adegbite-Adeniyi; Brittany Gron; Brieana M Rowles; Christine A Demeter; Robert L Findling Journal: Expert Opin Pharmacother Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 3.889
Authors: Laura Kann; Steve Kinchen; Shari L Shanklin; Katherine H Flint; Joseph Kawkins; William A Harris; Richard Lowry; Emily O'Malley Olsen; Tim McManus; David Chyen; Lisa Whittle; Eboni Taylor; Zewditu Demissie; Nancy Brener; Jemekia Thornton; John Moore; Stephanie Zaza Journal: MMWR Suppl Date: 2014-06-13