Literature DB >> 23954755

Induced periosteum a complex cellular scaffold for the treatment of large bone defects.

Richard J Cuthbert1, Sarah M Churchman, Hiang B Tan, Dennis McGonagle, Elena Jones, Peter V Giannoudis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Surgically induced periosteal membrane holds great potential for the treatment of large bone defects representing a simple alternative to combinations of exogenous stem cells, scaffolds and growth factors. The purpose of this study was to explore the biological basis for this novel regenerative medicine strategy in man.
METHODS: Eight patients with critical size defects were treated with the induced membrane (IM) technique. After membrane formation 1cm(2) biopsy was taken together with matched, healthy diaphyseal periosteum (P) for comparative analysis. Morphological characteristics, cell composition and growth factor expression were compared. Functional and molecular evaluation of mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) activity was performed.
RESULTS: Both tissues shared similar morphology although IM was significantly thicker than P (p=0.032). The frequency of lymphocytes, pericytes (CD45(-)CD34(-)CD146(+)) and cells expressing markers consistent with bone marrow MSCs (CD45(-/low)CD271(bright)) were 31. 3 and 15.5-fold higher respectively in IM (all p=0.043). IM contained 3-fold more cells per gramme of tissue with a similar proportion of endothelial cells (CD45(-)CD31(+)). Expressed bone morphogenic protein 2, vascular endothelial growth factor and stromal derived factor 1 (SDF-1) are key tissue regeneration mediators. Adherent expanded cells from both tissues had molecular profiles similar to bone marrow MSCs but cells from IM expressed greater than 2 fold relative abundance of SDF-1transcript compared to P (p=0.043).
CONCLUSION: The IM is a thick, vascularised structure that resembles periosteum with a cellular composition and molecular profile facilitating large defect repair and therefore may be described as an "induced-periosteum". This tissue offers a powerful example of in situ tissue engineering.
© 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone regeneration; Induced membrane; Induced-periosteum; MSC; Osteoprogenitor cells

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23954755     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2013.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  37 in total

1.  Induced membrane maintains its osteogenic properties even when the second stage of Masquelet's technique is performed later.

Authors:  Florelle Gindraux; François Loisel; Michael Bourgeois; Karim Oudina; Martine Melin; Benoit de Billy; Pauline Sergent; Gregoire Leclerc; Hervé Petite; Frederic Auber; Laurent Obert; Isabelle Pluvy
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  Preformed Vascular Networks Survive and Enhance Vascularization in Critical Sized Cranial Defects.

Authors:  Brianna M Roux; Banu Akar; Wei Zhou; Katerina Stojkova; Beatriz Barrera; Jovan Brankov; Eric M Brey
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 3.  Periosteum derived stem cells for regenerative medicine proposals: Boosting current knowledge.

Authors:  Concetta Ferretti; Monica Mattioli-Belmonte
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2014-07-26       Impact factor: 5.326

4.  Altering spacer material affects bone regeneration in the Masquelet technique in a rat femoral defect.

Authors:  Sarah McBride-Gagyi; Zacharie Toth; Daniel Kim; Victoria Ip; Emily Evans; John Tracy Watson; Daemeon Nicolaou
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Masquelet technique: The effect of altering implant material and topography on membrane matrix composition, mechanical and barrier properties in a rat defect model.

Authors:  Natalie Gaio; Alice Martino; Zacharie Toth; J Tracy Watson; Daemeon Nicolaou; Sarah McBride-Gagyi
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Multipotential stromal cell abundance in cellular bone allograft: comparison with fresh age-matched iliac crest bone and bone marrow aspirate.

Authors:  Thomas G Baboolal; Sally A Boxall; Yasser M El-Sherbiny; Timothy A Moseley; Richard J Cuthbert; Peter V Giannoudis; Dennis McGonagle; Elena Jones
Journal:  Regen Med       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.806

Review 7.  Treatment of critical-sized bone defects: clinical and tissue engineering perspectives.

Authors:  Erika Roddy; Malcolm R DeBaun; Adam Daoud-Gray; Yunzhi P Yang; Michael J Gardner
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-10-28

8.  Increased expression of melanoma stem cell marker CD271 in metastatic melanoma to the brain.

Authors:  Ruifeng Guo; Amelia Fierro-Fine; Lindsey Goddard; Madison Russell; Jie Chen; Cheng Z Liu; Kar-Ming Fung; Lewis A Hassell
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-12-01

9.  Fabrication, vascularization and osteogenic properties of a novel synthetic biomimetic induced membrane for the treatment of large bone defects.

Authors:  Liling Ren; Yunqing Kang; Christopher Browne; Julius Bishop; Yunzhi Yang
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Evaluation of global gene expression in regenerate tissues during Masquelet treatment.

Authors:  Nishant Gohel; Rafael Senos; Steven A Goldstein; Kurt D Hankenson; Mark E Hake; Andrea I Alford
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 3.494

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.