Literature DB >> 18460845

Apparent diffusion coefficients of breast tumors: clinical application.

Masamitsu Hatakenaka1, Hiroyasu Soeda, Hidetake Yabuuchi, Yoshio Matsuo, Takeshi Kamitani, Yoshinao Oda, Masazumi Tsuneyoshi, Hiroshi Honda.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for the differential diagnosis of breast tumors and to determine the relation between ADC and tumor cellularity.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and thirty-six female patients (age range, 17-83 years; average age, 51.7 years) with 140 histologically proven breast tumors underwent diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (DWI) using the spin-echo echo-planar technique, and the ADCs of the tumors were calculated using 3 different b values, 0, 500, and 1000 s/mm(2). The diagnoses consisted of fibroadenoma (FA, n=16), invasive ductal carcinoma, not otherwise specified (IDC, n=117), medullary carcinoma (ME, n=3) and mucinous carcinoma (MU, n=4). Tumor cellularity was calculated from surgical specimens. The ADCs of breast tumors and cellularity were compared between different histological types by analysis of variance and Scheffe's post hoc test. The correlation between tumor cellularity and ADC was analyzed by Pearson correlation test.
RESULTS: Significant differences were observed in ADCs between FA and all types of cancers (P<0.05) and between MU and other types of cancers (P<0.01) and in cellularity between FA and cancers except MU (P<0.01) and between MU and other types of cancers (P<0.01). There was an inverse correlation between ADC and tumor cellularity (P<0.01, r(2)=0.451).
CONCLUSIONS: The ADC may potentially help in differentiating benign and malignant breast tumors. Tumor ADC correlates inversely with tumor cellularity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18460845     DOI: 10.2463/mrms.7.23

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci        ISSN: 1347-3182            Impact factor:   2.471


  73 in total

1.  Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: a pilot study.

Authors:  Pascal A T Baltzer; Anja Schäfer; Matthias Dietzel; David Grässel; Mieczyslaw Gajda; Oumar Camara; Werner A Kaiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in focal breast lesions: analysis of 78 cases with pathological correlation.

Authors:  F Fornasa; L Pinali; A Gasparini; E Toniolli; S Montemezzi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in MR mammography (MRM): clinical comparison of echo planar imaging (EPI) and half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE) diffusion techniques.

Authors:  P A T Baltzer; D M Renz; K-H Herrmann; M Dietzel; I Krumbein; M Gajda; O Camara; J R Reichenbach; W A Kaiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Sensitivity and specificity of unenhanced MR mammography (DWI combined with T2-weighted TSE imaging, ueMRM) for the differentiation of mass lesions.

Authors:  Pascal A T Baltzer; Matthias Benndorf; Matthias Dietzel; Mieczyslaw Gajda; Oumar Camara; Werner A Kaiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Apparent diffusion coefficient calculated with relatively high b-values correlates with local failure of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with radiotherapy.

Authors:  M Hatakenaka; Y Shioyama; K Nakamura; H Yabuuchi; Y Matsuo; S Sunami; T Kamitani; T Yoshiura; T Nakashima; K Nishikawa; H Honda
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Fat suppression techniques (STIR vs. SPAIR) on diffusion-weighted imaging of breast lesions at 3.0 T: preliminary experience.

Authors:  Sofia Brandão; Luísa Nogueira; Eduarda Matos; Rita Gouveia Nunes; Hugo Alexandre Ferreira; Joana Loureiro; Isabel Ramos
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  Evaluation of Kinetic Entropy of Breast Masses Initially Found on MRI using Whole-lesion Curve Distribution Data: Comparison with the Standard Kinetic Analysis.

Authors:  Akiko Shimauchi; Hiroyuki Abe; David V Schacht; Jian Yulei; Federico D Pineda; Sanaz A Jansen; Rajiv Ganesh; Gillian M Newstead
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Nonmalignant breast lesions: ADCs of benign and high-risk subtypes assessed as false-positive at dynamic enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  Sana Parsian; Habib Rahbar; Kimberly H Allison; Wendy B Demartini; Matthew L Olson; Constance D Lehman; Savannah C Partridge
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast lesions: Region-of-interest placement and different ADC parameters influence apparent diffusion coefficient values.

Authors:  Hubert Bickel; Katja Pinker; Stephan Polanec; Heinrich Magometschnigg; Georg Wengert; Claudio Spick; Wolfgang Bogner; Zsuzsanna Bago-Horvath; Thomas H Helbich; Pascal Baltzer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Assessment of tumor morphology on diffusion-weighted (DWI) breast MRI: Diagnostic value of reduced field of view DWI.

Authors:  Maarten W Barentsz; Valentina Taviani; Jung M Chang; Debra M Ikeda; Kanae K Miyake; Suchandrima Banerjee; Maurice A A J van den Bosch; Brian A Hargreaves; Bruce L Daniel
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.