Literature DB >> 23946002

Detection of deception based on fMRI activation patterns underlying the production of a deceptive response and receiving feedback about the success of the deception after a mock murder crime.

Qian Cui1, Eric J Vanman2, Dongtao Wei1, Wenjing Yang1, Lei Jia1, Qinglin Zhang3.   

Abstract

The ability of a deceiver to track a victim's ongoing judgments about the truthfulness of the deceit can be critical for successful deception. However, no study has yet investigated the neural circuits underlying receiving a judgment about one's lie. To explore this issue, we used a modified Guilty Knowledge Test in a mock murder situation to simultaneously record the neural responses involved in producing deception and later when judgments of that deception were made. Producing deception recruited the bilateral inferior parietal lobules (IPLs), right ventral lateral prefrontal (VLPF) areas and right striatum, among which the activation of the right VLPF contributed mostly to diagnosing the identities of the participants, correctly diagnosing 81.25% of 'murderers' and 81.25% of 'innocents'. Moreover, the participant's response when their deception was successful uniquely recruited the right middle frontal gyrus, bilateral IPLs, bilateral orbitofrontal cortices, bilateral middle temporal gyrus and left cerebellum, among which the right IPL contributed mostly to diagnosing participants' identities, correctly diagnosing 93.75% of murderers and 87.5% of innocents. This study shows that neural activity associated with being a successful liar (or not) is a feasible indicator for detecting lies and may be more valid than neural activity associated with producing deception.
© The Author (2013). Published by Oxford University Press. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  deception; functional magnetic resonance imaging; judgment; lie detection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23946002      PMCID: PMC4187261          DOI: 10.1093/scan/nst134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci        ISSN: 1749-5016            Impact factor:   3.436


  42 in total

1.  Neural correlates of telling lies: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study at 4 Tesla.

Authors:  K Luan Phan; Alvaro Magalhaes; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Daniel A Fitzgerald; Christopher Green; Wilbur Smith
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Detecting deception using functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  F Andrew Kozel; Kevin A Johnson; Qiwen Mu; Emily L Grenesko; Steven J Laken; Mark S George
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2005-09-26       Impact factor: 13.382

3.  Telling truth from lie in individual subjects with fast event-related fMRI.

Authors:  Daniel D Langleben; James W Loughead; Warren B Bilker; Kosha Ruparel; Anna Rose Childress; Samantha I Busch; Ruben C Gur
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Emerging neurotechnologies for lie-detection: promises and perils.

Authors:  Paul Root Wolpe; Kenneth R Foster; Daniel D Langleben
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 11.229

5.  Brain regions underlying response inhibition and interference monitoring and suppression.

Authors:  Giuseppe Blasi; Terry E Goldberg; Thomas Weickert; Saumitra Das; Philip Kohn; Brad Zoltick; Alessandro Bertolino; Joseph H Callicott; Daniel R Weinberger; Venkata S Mattay
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.386

6.  The functional anatomical distinction between truth telling and deception is preserved among people with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Catherine J Kaylor-Hughes; Sudheer T Lankappa; Robert Fung; Alexandra E Hope-Urwin; Iain D Wilkinson; Sean A Spence
Journal:  Crim Behav Ment Health       Date:  2011-02

7.  A replication study of the neural correlates of deception.

Authors:  Frank Andrew Kozel; Tamara M Padgett; Mark S George
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.912

8.  Psychopathic traits and deception: functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Rachael S Fullam; Shane McKie; Mairead C Dolan
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 9.319

9.  What if I Get Busted? Deception, Choice, and Decision-Making in Social Interaction.

Authors:  Kamila E Sip; Joshua C Skewes; Jennifer L Marchant; William B McGregor; Andreas Roepstorff; Christopher D Frith
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  The engagement of mid-ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and posterior brain regions in intentional cognitive activity.

Authors:  Anja Dove; Tom Manly; Russell Epstein; Adrian M Owen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.038

View more
  7 in total

1.  The effect of mental countermeasures on neuroimaging-based concealed information tests.

Authors:  Chun-Wei Hsu; Chiara Begliomini; Tommaso Dall'Acqua; Giorgio Ganis
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  I lie, why don't you: Neural mechanisms of individual differences in self-serving lying.

Authors:  Lijun Yin; Bernd Weber
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  The neural basis of deception in strategic interactions.

Authors:  Kirsten G Volz; Kai Vogeley; Marc Tittgemeyer; D Yves von Cramon; Matthias Sutter
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 3.558

4.  Exploring time- and frequency- dependent functional connectivity and brain networks during deception with single-trial event-related potentials.

Authors:  Jun-Feng Gao; Yong Yang; Wen-Tao Huang; Pan Lin; Sheng Ge; Hong-Mei Zheng; Ling-Yun Gu; Hui Zhou; Chen-Hong Li; Ni-Ni Rao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Social anxiety disorder exhibit impaired networks involved in self and theory of mind processing.

Authors:  Qian Cui; Eric J Vanman; Zhiliang Long; Yajing Pang; Yuyan Chen; Yifeng Wang; Xujun Duan; Heng Chen; Qiyong Gong; Wei Zhang; Huafu Chen
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Getting the Joke: Insight during Humor Comprehension - Evidence from an fMRI Study.

Authors:  Fang Tian; Yuling Hou; Wenfeng Zhu; Arne Dietrich; Qinglin Zhang; Wenjing Yang; Qunlin Chen; Jiangzhou Sun; Qiu Jiang; Guikang Cao
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-10-18

7.  Functional Connectivity Pattern Analysis Underlying Neural Oscillation Synchronization during Deception.

Authors:  Peng Liu; Hongkui Shen; Shumei Ji
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.599

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.