Literature DB >> 30353970

I lie, why don't you: Neural mechanisms of individual differences in self-serving lying.

Lijun Yin1,2,3, Bernd Weber4,5.   

Abstract

People tend to lie in varying degrees. To advance our understanding of the underlying neural mechanisms of this heterogeneity, we investigated individual differences in self-serving lying. We performed a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in 37 participants and introduced a color-reporting game where lying about the color would in general lead to higher monetary payoffs but would also be punished if get caught. At the behavioral level, individuals lied to different extents. Besides, individuals who are more dishonest showed shorter lying response time, whereas no significant correlation was found between truth-telling response time and the degree of dishonesty. At the neural level, the left caudate, ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) were key regions reflecting individual differences in making dishonest decisions. The dishonesty associated activity in these regions decreased with increased dishonesty. Subsequent generalized psychophysiological interaction analyses showed that individual differences in self-serving lying were associated with the functional connectivity among the caudate, vmPFC, IFG, and dlPFC. More importantly, regardless of the decision types, the neural patterns of the left caudate and vmPFC during the decision-making phase could be used to predict individual degrees of dishonesty. The present study demonstrated that lying decisions differ substantially from person to person in the functional connectivity and neural activation patterns which can be used to predict individual degrees of dishonesty.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  deception; fMRI; individual differences

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30353970      PMCID: PMC6865395          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  69 in total

Review 1.  Neural computations associated with goal-directed choice.

Authors:  Antonio Rangel; Todd Hare
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 2.  Reward representations and reward-related learning in the human brain: insights from neuroimaging.

Authors:  John P O'Doherty
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Neural correlates of telling lies: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study at 4 Tesla.

Authors:  K Luan Phan; Alvaro Magalhaes; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Daniel A Fitzgerald; Christopher Green; Wilbur Smith
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Decoding the neural substrates of reward-related decision making with functional MRI.

Authors:  Alan N Hampton; John P O'doherty
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Multivariate pattern analysis of fMRI: the early beginnings.

Authors:  James V Haxby
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  PRoNTo: pattern recognition for neuroimaging toolbox.

Authors:  J Schrouff; M J Rosa; J M Rondina; A F Marquand; C Chu; J Ashburner; C Phillips; J Richiardi; J Mourão-Miranda
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2013-07

7.  Using fMRI to decode true thoughts independent of intention to conceal.

Authors:  Zhi Yang; Zirui Huang; Javier Gonzalez-Castillo; Rui Dai; Georg Northoff; Peter Bandettini
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Neural correlates of feigned memory impairment.

Authors:  Tatia M C Lee; Ho-Ling Liu; Chetwyn C H Chan; Yen-Bee Ng; Peter T Fox; Jia-Hong Gao
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  The brain adapts to dishonesty.

Authors:  Neil Garrett; Stephanie C Lazzaro; Dan Ariely; Tali Sharot
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Sex, lies and fMRI--gender differences in neural basis of deception.

Authors:  Artur Marchewka; Katarzyna Jednorog; Marcel Falkiewicz; Wojciech Szeszkowski; Anna Grabowska; Iwona Szatkowska
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  Neurocomputational mechanisms underlying immoral decisions benefiting self or others.

Authors:  Chen Qu; Yang Hu; Zixuan Tang; Edmund Derrington; Jean-Claude Dreher
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Neural basis of corruption in power-holders.

Authors:  Yang Hu; Chen Hu; Edmund Derrington; Brice Corgnet; Chen Qu; Jean-Claude Dreher
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  I lie, why don't you: Neural mechanisms of individual differences in self-serving lying.

Authors:  Lijun Yin; Bernd Weber
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Neural mechanisms of deception in a social context: an fMRI replication study.

Authors:  Maya Zheltyakova; Maxim Kireev; Alexander Korotkov; Svyatoslav Medvedev
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Detecting spontaneous deception in the brain.

Authors:  Yen-Ju Feng; Shao-Min Hung; Po-Jang Hsieh
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 5.399

6.  Morality in the flesh: on the link between bodily self-consciousness, moral identity and (dis)honest behaviour.

Authors:  Marina Scattolin; Maria Serena Panasiti; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 3.653

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.